Homomorphic Encryption (HE) provides strong data privacy for cloud services but at the cost of prohibitive computational overhead. While GPUs have emerged as a practical platform for accelerating HE, there remains an order-ofmagnitude energy-efficiency gap compared to specialized (but expensive) HE ASICs. This paper explores an alternate direction: leveraging existing AI accelerators, like Google's TPUs with coarse-grained compute and memory architectures, to offer a path toward ASIC-level energy efficiency for HE. However, this architectural paradigm creates a fundamental mismatch with SoTA HE algorithms designed for GPUs. These algorithms rely heavily on: (1) high-precision (32-bit) integer arithmetic to now run on a TPU's low-throughput vector unit, leaving its high-throughput low-precision (8-bit) matrix engine (MXU) idle, and (2) fine-grained data permutations that are inefficient on the TPU's coarse-grained memory subsystem. Consequently, porting GPU-optimized HE libraries to TPUs results in severe resource under-utilization and performance degradation. To tackle above challenges, we introduce CROSS, a compiler framework that systematically transforms HE workloads to align with the TPU's architecture. CROSS makes two key contributions: (1) Basis-Aligned Transformation (BAT), a novel technique that converts high-precision modular arithmetic into dense, low-precision (INT8) matrix multiplications, unlocking and improving the utilization of TPU's MXU for HE, and (2) Memory-Aligned Transformation (MAT), which eliminates costly runtime data reordering by embedding reordering into compute kernels through offline parameter transformation. Our evaluation on a real single-host Google TPU v6e refreshes the SoTA Number Theoretic Transform (NTT) throughput record with up-to$1.43 \times$throughput improvement over WarpDrive on a NVIDIA A100. Furthermore, CROSS achieves$451 \times, 7.81 \times, 1.83 \times, 1.31 \times, 1.86 \times$, and$1.15 \times$higher throughput per watt than OpenFHE, WarpDrive, FIDESlib, FAB, HEAP, and Cheddar, respectively, establishing AI ASIC as the SotA efficient platform for HE operators. Code: https://github.com/EfficientPPML/CROSS.

Abstract Low-treedepth colorings are an important tool for algorithms that exploit structure in classes of bounded expansion; they guarantee subgraphs that use few colors have bounded treedepth. These colorings have an implicit tradeoff between the total number of colors used and the treedepth bound, and prior empirical work suggests that the former dominates the run time of existing algorithms in practice. We introduce p-linear colorings as an alternative to the commonly used p-centered colorings. They can be efficiently computed in bounded expansion classes and use at most as many colors as p-centered colorings. Although a set of $$k k < p colors from a p-centered coloring induces a subgraph of treedepth at most k, the same number of colors from a p-linear coloring may induce subgraphs of larger treedepth. We establish a polynomial upper bound on the treedepth in general graphs, and give tighter bounds in trees and interval graphs via constructive coloring algorithms. We also give a co-NP-completeness reduction for recognizing p-linear colorings and discuss ways to overcome this limitation in practice.

We study three classical machine learning algorithms in the context of algorithmic fairness: adaptive boosting, support vector machines, and logistic regression. Our goal is to maintain the high accuracy of these learning algorithms while reducing the degree to which they discriminate against individuals because of their membership in a protected group. Our first contribution is a method for achieving fairness by shifting the decision boundary for the protected group. The method is based on the theory of margins for boosting. Our method performs comparably to or outperforms previous algorithms in the fairness literature in terms of accuracy and low discrimination, while simultaneously allowing for a fast and transparent quantification of the trade-off between bias and error. Our second contribution addresses the shortcomings of the bias-error trade-off studied in most of the algorithmic fairness literature. We demonstrate that even hopelessly naive modifications of a biased algorithm, which cannot be reasonably said to be fair, can still achieve low bias and high accuracy. To help to distinguish between these naive algorithms and more sensible algorithms we propose a new measure of fairness, called resilience to random bias (RRB). We demonstrate that RRB distinguishes well between our naive and sensible fairness algorithms. RRB together with bias and accuracy provides a more complete picture of the fairness of an algorithm.

We pose an open problem on the complexity of learning the behavior of a quantum circuit with value injection queries. We define the learning model for quantum circuits and give preliminary results. Using the test-path lemma of Angluin et al. (2009a), we show that new ideas are likely needed to tackle value injection queries for the quantum setting.