Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arkadiusz Jachnik

dblp:133/9072 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 84% Learning paradigms · 16%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
f-measure optimization
0.422014
On the bayes-optimality of F-measure maximizers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014
Optimizing the F-Measure in Multi-Label Classification: Plug-in Rule Approach versus Structured Loss Minimization · ICML (3) 2013
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical pattern recognition
bayes optimal classifier
0.212014
On the bayes-optimality of F-measure maximizers · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-label classification
0.212013
Optimizing the F-Measure in Multi-Label Classification: Plug-in Rule Approach versus Structured Loss Minimization · ICML (3) 2013
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
statistical consistency
0.212013
Optimizing the F-Measure in Multi-Label Classification: Plug-in Rule Approach versus Structured Loss Minimization · ICML (3) 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayes optimality analysis · 0.2structured support vector machine · 0.2plug-in rule · 0.2multinomial regression · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Assessing the Effectiveness of Sequences of Treatments Using Sequential Patterns
Maciej Piernik, Joanna Solomiewicz, Arkadiusz Jachnik
AIME3
2014 On the bayes-optimality of F-measure maximizers
Willem Waegeman, Krzysztof Dembczynski, Arkadiusz Jachnik, Weiwei Cheng, Eyke Hüllermeier
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2013 Optimizing the F-Measure in Multi-Label Classification: Plug-in Rule Approach versus Structured Loss Minimization
abstract
We compare the plug-in rule approach for optimizing the F-measure in multi-label classification with an approach based on structured loss minimization, such as the structured support vector machine (SSVM). Whereas the former derives an optimal prediction from a probabilistic model in a separate inference step, the latter seeks to optimize the F-measure directly during the training phase. We introduce a novel plug-in rule algorithm that estimates all parameters required for a Bayes-optimal prediction via a set of multinomial regression models, and we compare this algorithm with SSVMs in terms of computational complexity and statistical consistency. As a main theoretical result, we show that our plug-in rule algorithm is consistent, whereas the SSVM approaches are not. Finally, we present results of a large experimental study showing the benefits of the introduced algorithm.
Krzysztof Dembczynski, Arkadiusz Jachnik, Wojciech Kotlowski, Willem Waegeman, Eyke Hüllermeier
ICML (3)2