Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Moshe Shamy

dblp:134/4028 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
approximate graph mining
0.212013
Approximate graph mining with label costs · KDD 2013
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.212013
Approximate graph mining with label costs · KDD 2013
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
subgraph mining
0.212013
Approximate graph mining with label costs · KDD 2013
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph isomorphism
0.012013
Approximate graph mining with label costs · KDD 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

label cost · 0.3approximate isomorphism · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Approximate graph mining with label costs
abstract
Many real-world graphs have complex labels on the nodes and edges. Mining only exact patterns yields limited insights, since it may be hard to find exact matches. However, in many domains it is relatively easy to define a cost (or distance) between different labels. Using this information, it becomes possible to mine a much richer set of approximate subgraph patterns, which preserve the topology but allow bounded label mismatches. We present novel and scalable methods to efficiently solve the approximate isomorphism problem. We show that approximate mining yields interesting patterns in several real-world graphs ranging from IT and protein interaction networks to protein structures.
Pranay Anchuri, Mohammed J. Zaki, Omer Barkol, Shahar Golan, Moshe Shamy
KDD5