Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martine Decouvelaere
dblp:134/5277
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1979
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
block codes |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Replication decoding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1979 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
decoding |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Replication decoding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1979 |
Coding theory
error-correcting codes |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Replication decoding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1979 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear block codes |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Replication decoding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1979 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › decoding algorithms › optimal decoding
maximum-likelihood decoding |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Replication decoding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1979 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
convolutional codes |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Replication decoding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1979 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › convolutional codes › convolutional code decoding
decision feedback decoding |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Replication decoding · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1979 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trellis representation · 0.0threshold decoding · 0.0soft-decision demodulation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1979 | Replication decodingabstractAny symbol in a redundant code can be recovered when it belongs to certain erasure patterns. Several alternative expressions of a given symbol, to be referred to as its replicas, can therefore be computed in terms of other ones. Decoding is interpreted as decoding upon a received symbol, given itself and a number of such replicas, expressed in terms of other received symbols. For linearq-ary (n,k)block codes, soft-decision demodulation and memoryless channels, the maximum-likelihood decision rule on a given symbol is formulated in terms ofr \leqn - klinearly independent replicas from the parity-check equations. All replicas deriving from therselected replicas by linear combination are actually taken into account in this decision rule. Its implementation can be direct; use transformations or a sequential circuit implementing a trellis representation of the parity-check matrix. Ifr = n - k, decoding is optimum, in the sense of symbol-by-symbol maximum-likelihoed. Simplification results in the transformed and sequential implementations whenr < n - k. If the selected replicas are disjoint, generalized (q-ary, weighted) threshold decoding results. The decoding process can easily be modffied in order to provide word-by-word maximum-likelihood decoding. Convolutional codes are briefly considered. Two specific problems are discussed: the use of previous decisions, which leads to a weighted generalization of feedback decoding, and the extension of replication decoding to nonsystematic codes. Gerard Battail, Martine Decouvelaere, Philippe Godlewski |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |