Navigating the maze of contemporary organizational attack surfaces is paramount in fortifying our defenses against the relentless tide of cyber incidents. However, existing network reconnaissance and security measurements, which enumerate IP addresses or scan popular domains searching for vulnerabilities, capture only a fragmented view of the risk landscape, neglecting the nuanced reality of modern organizational assets. We experimentally show that such scans miss out on most assets of large organizations since they do not consider the increasingly complex IT architectures.

We present the password reset MitM (PRMitM) attack and show how it can be used to take over user accounts. The PRMitM attack exploits the similarity of the registration and password reset processes to launch a man in the middle (MitM) attack at the application level. The attacker initiates a password reset process with a website and forwards every challenge to the victim who either wishes to register in the attacking site or to access a particular resource on it. The attack has several variants, including exploitation of a password reset process that relies on the victim's mobile phone, using either SMS or phone call. We evaluated the PRMitM attacks on Google and Facebook users in several experiments, and found that their password reset process is vulnerable to the PRMitM attack. Other websites and some popular mobile applications are vulnerable as well. Although solutions seem trivial in some cases, our experiments show that the straightforward solutions are not as effective as expected. We designed and evaluated two secure password reset processes and evaluated them on users of Google and Facebook. Our results indicate a significant improvement in the security. Since millions of accounts are currently vulnerable to the PRMitM attack, we also present a list of recommendations for implementing and auditing the password reset process.

We present the malicious CAPTCHA attack, allowing a rogue website to trick users into unknowingly disclosing their private information. The rogue site displays the private information to the user in obfuscated manner, as if it is a CAPTCHA challenge; the user is unaware that solving the CAPTCHA, results in disclosing private information. This circumvents the Same Origin Policy (SOP), whose goal is to prevent access by rogue sites to private information, by exploiting the fact that many websites allow display of private information (to the user), upon requests from any (even rogue) website. Information so disclosed includes name, phone number, email and physical addresses, search history, preferences, partial credit card numbers, and more. The vulnerability is common and the attack works for many popular sites, including nine out of the ten most popular websites. We evaluated the attack using IRB-approved, ethical user experiments.

We identify the threat of cross-site framing attacks, which involves planting false evidence that incriminates computer users, without requiring access to their computer. We further show that a variety of framing-evidence can be planted using only modest framing-attacker capabilities. The attacker can plant evidence in both the logs of popular reputable sites and in the computer of the victim, without requiring client-side malware and without leaving traces.

Cross-site search (XS-search) attacks circumvent the same-origin policy and extract sensitive information, by using the time it takes for the browser to receive responses to search queries. This side-channel is usually considered impractical, due to the limited attack duration and high variability of delays. This may be true for naive XS-search attacks; however, we show that the use of better tools facilitates effective XS-search attacks, exposing information efficiently and precisely.