VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jakub Kuzilek
dblp:135/3559
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8656-0599ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 12 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 10 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | The 2nd Human-Centric eXplainable AI in Education (HEXED) Workshop
Vinitra Swamy, Jakub Kuzilek, Juan D. Pinto, Luc Paquette, Tanja Käser, Qianhui Liu, Lea Cohausz |
EDM | 2 |
| 2025 | AI-Generated Feedback in Higher Education: The Tool for Analytic RubricsabstractThis paper introduces a tool for auto-generating criteria-oriented feedback in higher education. A model is trained based on 39 historical student submissions and teacher ratings. The tool combines natural language processing with large language model capacities to analyze contextual criteria, for which regression trees are trained. It aims to mimic teachers when providing feedback utilizing analytic rubrics. The evaluation results with 38 new submissions reveal that predictions are good, serving as a fruitful base to optimize the process when providing formative feedback. Sylvio Rüdian, Jakub Kuzilek, Claudia Ruhland, Yassin Elsir, Marvin Kretschmer, Julia Podelo, Niels Pinkwart |
ICALT | 2 |
| 2025 | Feedback on Feedback: Student's Perceptions for Feedback from Teachers and Few-Shot LLMs
Sylvio Rüdian, Julia Podelo, Jakub Kuzilek, Niels Pinkwart |
LAK | 3 |
| 2025 | Detecting Interaction Patterns in Educational Collaborative WritingabstractWriting and collaboration are crucial skills in professional and academic settings. However, assessments of collaborative writing often focus only on the final text, overlooking individual contributions and the diverse strategies students employ during the writing process. To support teachers in interpreting and assessing student behaviour, we propose analysing writing data at a granular level, down to individual characters, and using user sessions as observation units to capture coherent interaction patterns. This paper introduces three methods for identifying interaction patterns in collaborative writing. The first method classifies session types by analysing features such as writing, reading, and communication behaviours, session length, and the number of group members collaborating synchronously. The second method identifies frequent sequences of session types by examining their order, enabling process analyses at an abstract yet manageable level compared to using log data. The third method focuses on text-level collaboration by evaluating the frequency of text passage modifications made by the original author or other group members. This approach quantifies individual collaboration and, at the group level, identifies isolated versus closely connected group members, shedding light on the mode of collaboration and degree of group cohesion. We demonstrate these three methods in a case study involving two cohorts, K A = 294 and K B = 242 groups of up to 9 learners (N A = 1, 848, N B = 1, 463). The interaction patterns identified using these methods are intended to help teachers understand collaborative writing processes and identify situations where the participating learners require support. Niels Seidel, Marc Burchart, Jörg M. Haake, Clara Schumacher, Jakub Kuzilek |
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. | 5 |
| 2024 | Rule-based and prediction-based computer-generated Feedback in Online CoursesabstractComputer-generated feedback can be created manifold. This paper compares two approaches for generating feedback: rule-based and prediction-based. Both approaches have several advantages and disadvantages, which are discussed in detail considering precision, recall, human effort for model creation, and explainability requirements. Sylvio Rüdian, Clara Schumacher, Michael Hanses, Jakub Kuzilek, Niels Pinkwart |
ICALT | 4 |
| 2023 | Pre-selecting Text Snippets to provide formative Feedback in Online Learning
Sylvio Rüdian, Clara Schumacher, Jakub Kuzilek, Niels Pinkwart |
EDM | 3 |
| 2021 | Analyzing Student Success and Mistakes in Virtual Microscope Structure Search Tasks
Benjamin Paaßen, Andreas Bertsch, Katharina Langer-Fischer, Sylvio Rüdian, Xia Wang 0003, Rupali Sinha, Jakub Kuzilek, Stefan Britsch, Niels Pinkwart |
EDM | 7 |
| 2021 | Student success prediction using student exam behaviour
Jakub Kuzilek, Zdenek Zdráhal, Viktor Fuglik |
Future Gener. Comput. Syst. | 1 |
| 2020 | Scaling Mentoring Support with Distributed Artificial Intelligence
Ralf Klamma, Peter de Lange, Alexander Tobias Neumann, Benedikt Hensen, Milos Kravcik, Xia Wang 0003, Jakub Kuzilek |
ITS | 7 |
| 2020 | Exploring exam strategies of successful first year engineering studentsabstractAt present, universities collect study-related data about their students. This information can be used to support students at risk of failing their studies. At the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering (FME), Czech Technical University in Prague (CTU), the group of the first-year students is the most vulnerable. The most critical part of the first year is the winter exam period when students usually divide into those who will pass and fail. One of the most important abilities, students need to learn, is exam planning, and our research aims at the exploration of the exam strategies of successful students. These strategies can be used for improving first-year students retention. The outgoing research on the analysis of exam strategies of the first-year students in the academic year 2017/2018 is reported. From a total of 361 first-year students, successful students have been selected. The successful student is the one who finished all three mandatory exams before the end of the first exam period. From the exam sequences of 153 selected students, a "layered" Markov chain probabilistic model has been constructed. It uncovered the most common exam strategies taken by those students. Jakub Kuzilek, Zdenek Zdráhal, Jonas Vaclavek, Viktor Fuglik, Jan Skocilas |
LAK | 1 |
| 2019 | Analysing Student VLE Behaviour Intensity and Performance
Jakub Kuzilek, Jonas Vaclavek, Zdenek Zdráhal, Viktor Fuglik |
EC-TEL | 1 |
| 2018 | Student Drop-out Modelling Using Virtual Learning Environment Behaviour Data
Jakub Kuzilek, Jonas Vaclavek, Viktor Fuglik, Zdenek Zdráhal |
EC-TEL | 1 |
| 2018 | Learning Analytics Dashboard Analysing First-Year Engineering Students
Jonas Vaclavek, Jakub Kuzilek, Jan Skocilas, Zdenek Zdráhal, Viktor Fuglik |
EC-TEL | 2 |
| 2016 | Data literacy for learning analyticsabstractThis workshop explores how data literacy impacts on learning analytics both for practitioners and for end users. The term data literacy is used to broadly describe the set of abilities around the use of data as part of everyday thinking and reasoning for solving real-world problems. It is a skill required both by learning analytics practitioners to derive actionable insights from data and by the intended end users, such that it affects their ability to accurately interpret and critique presented analysis of data. The latter is particularly important, since learning analytics outcomes can be targeted at a wide range of end users, some of whom will be young students and many of whom are not data specialists. Annika Wolff, Zdenek Zdráhal, Martin Hlosta, Jakub Kuzilek |
LAK | 5 |
| 2014 | Binary social impact theory based optimization and its applications in pattern recognition
Martin Macas, Amol P. Bhondekar, Ritesh Kumar 0001, Rishemjit Kaur, Jakub Kuzilek, Václav Gerla, Lenka Lhotská, Pawan Kapur |
Neurocomputing | 5 |