Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ian Childs

dblp:135/6290 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 81% Image and video coding · 19%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia systems and quality of experience
high-definition television
0.011985
The evolution towards high-definition television · Proc. IEEE 1985
Image and video coding
bandwidth compression
0.011985
The evolution towards high-definition television · Proc. IEEE 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

standards compatibility analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1985 The evolution towards high-definition television
abstract
The paper discusses the impact on our multimedia society of the recent practice of using different TV standards for the various parts of the chain from studio to receiver. This trend to optimize the standard for each stage rather than stick to one standard throughout paves the way for the evolutionary approach to HDTV. High-definition studio sources will also have to provide signals for existing terrestrial networks as well as the newer media distribution methods such as cable, DBS, tape, and disc. The paper discusses the relationship of possible HDTV studio standards to these other channels and attempts to quantify, the magnitude of the problems of achieving compatibility and "transparency." The main question of compatibility is identified as the need to solve the problem of using the same studio source as a signal for 60- as well as 50-Hz transmissions. "Transparency" can be achieved in a compatible way by adding bandwidth to carry the higher definition. However, if sophisticated bandwidth reduction techniques using picture storage in the receiver are to be used to achieve optimum spectrum usage a new starting point of standardization for transmission is required.
Charles P. Sandbank, Ian Childs
Proc. IEEE2