Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yifeng Frank Huang

dblp:135/6706 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 91% Distributed systems · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › file systems
distributed file system
0.212013
Replication, history, and grafting in the Ori file system · SOSP 2013
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
file replication
0.212013
Replication, history, and grafting in the Ori file system · SOSP 2013
Storage systems
file systems
0.212013
Replication, history, and grafting in the Ori file system · SOSP 2013
Distributed systems
peer-to-peer systems
0.012013
Replication, history, and grafting in the Ori file system · SOSP 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

opportunistic synchronization · 0.2grafting · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Replication, history, and grafting in the Ori file system
abstract
Ori is a file system that manages user data in a modern setting where users have multiple devices and wish to access files everywhere, synchronize data, recover from disk failure, access old versions, and share data. The key to satisfying these needs is keeping and replicating file system history across devices, which is now practical as storage space has outpaced both wide-area network (WAN) bandwidth and the size of managed data. Replication provides access to files from multiple devices. History provides synchronization and offline access. Replication and history together subsume backup by providing snapshots and avoiding any single point of failure. In fact, Ori is fully peer-to-peer, offering opportunistic synchronization between user devices in close proximity and ensuring that the file system is usable so long as a single replica remains. Cross-file system data sharing with history is provided by a new mechanism called grafting. An evaluation shows that as a local file system, Ori has low overhead compared to a File system in User Space (FUSE) loopback driver; as a network file system, Ori over a WAN outperforms NFS over a LAN.
Ali José Mashtizadeh, Andrea Bittau, Yifeng Frank Huang, David Mazières
SOSP3