Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew M. Watkins
dblp:136/2582 · also Andrew Martin Watkins
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1617-1720ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Generative modeling · 60% Language models and text generation · 12% Optimization for machine learning · 12% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Unified all-atom molecule generation with neural fields · NeurIPS 2025 3D molecule generation by denoising voxel grids · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Unified all-atom molecule generation with neural fields · NeurIPS 2025 3D molecule generation by denoising voxel grids · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › cheminformatics
molecule generation |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Unified all-atom molecule generation with neural fields · NeurIPS 2025 3D molecule generation by denoising voxel grids · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
bilevel optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generalists vs. Specialists: Evaluating LLMs on Highly-Constrained Biophysical Sequence Optimization Tasks · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
LLM-based optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Generalists vs. Specialists: Evaluating LLMs on Highly-Constrained Biophysical Sequence Optimization Tasks · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › drug design
structure-based drug design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unified all-atom molecule generation with neural fields · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › molecular generation
3d molecule generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | 3D molecule generation by denoising voxel grids · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › score matching
denoising score matching |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | 3D molecule generation by denoising voxel grids · NeurIPS 2023 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping › map representation
voxel map |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | 3D molecule generation by denoising voxel grids · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | OpenProteinSet: Training data for structural biology at scale · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › implicit neural representation
neural field |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Unified all-atom molecule generation with neural fields · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | OpenProteinSet: Training data for structural biology at scale · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological database
protein interaction database |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | HippDB: a database of readily targeted helical protein-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | HippDB: a database of readily targeted helical protein-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
drug discovery |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | HippDB: a database of readily targeted helical protein-protein interactions · Bioinform. 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score-based generative model · 1.7preference learning · 1.7neural field · 1.7black-box optimization · 1.7bi-level optimization · 1.7neural empirical bayes · 1.3multiple sequence alignment · 1.3denoising neural network · 1.3alphafold2 · 1.3Langevin MCMC · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Generalists vs. Specialists: Evaluating LLMs on Highly-Constrained Biophysical Sequence Optimization TasksabstractAlthough large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in biomolecule optimization problems, they incur heavy computational costs and struggle to satisfy precise constraints. On the other hand, specialized solvers like LaMBO-2 offer efficiency and fine-grained control but require more domain expertise.
Comparing these approaches is challenging due to expensive laboratory validation and inadequate synthetic benchmarks.
We address this by introducing Ehrlich functions, a synthetic test suite that captures the geometric structure of biophysical sequence optimization problems.
With prompting alone, off-the-shelf LLMs struggle to optimize Ehrlich functions.
In response, we propose LLOME (Language Model Optimization with Margin Expectation), a bilevel optimization routine for online black-box optimization.
When combined with a novel preference learning loss, we find LLOME can not only learn to solve some Ehrlich functions, but
can even perform as well as or better than LaMBO-2 on moderately difficult Ehrlich variants.
However, LLMs also exhibit some likelihood-reward miscalibration and struggle without explicit rewards.
Our results indicate LLMs can occasionally provide significant benefits, but specialized solvers are still competitive and incur less overhead. Angelica Chen, Samuel Stanton, Frances Ding, Robert G. Alberstein, Andrew M. Watkins, Richard Bonneau, Vladimir Gligorijevic, Kyunghyun Cho, Nathan C. Frey |
ICML | 5 |
| 2025 | Unified all-atom molecule generation with neural fieldsabstractGenerative models for structure-based drug design are often limited to a specific modality, restricting their broader applicability. To address this challenge, we introduce FuncBind, a framework based on computer vision to generate target-conditioned, all-atom molecules across atomic systems. FuncBind uses neural fields to represent molecules as continuous atomic densities and employs score-based generative models with modern architectures adapted from the computer vision literature. This modality-agnostic representation allows a single unified model to be trained on diverse atomic systems, from small to large molecules, and handle variable atom/residue counts, including non-canonical amino acids. FuncBind achieves competitive in silico performance in generating small molecules, macrocyclic peptides, and antibody complementarity-determining region loops, conditioned on target structures. FuncBind also generated in vitro novel antibody binders via de novo redesign of the complementarity-determining region H3 loop of two chosen co-crystal structures. As a final contribution, we introduce a new dataset and benchmark for structure-conditioned macrocyclic peptide generation. Matthieu Kirchmeyer, Pedro O. Pinheiro, Emma Willett, Karolis Martinkus, Joseph Kleinhenz, Emily K. Makowski, Andrew M. Watkins, Vladimir Gligorijevic, Richard Bonneau, Saeed Saremi |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2023 | OpenProteinSet: Training data for structural biology at scaleabstractMultiple sequence alignments (MSAs) of proteins encode rich biological information and have been workhorses in bioinformatic methods for tasks like protein design and protein structure prediction for decades. Recent breakthroughs like AlphaFold2 that use transformers to attend directly over large quantities of raw MSAs have reaffirmed their importance. Generation of MSAs is highly computationally intensive, however, and no datasets comparable to those used to train AlphaFold2 have been made available to the research community, hindering progress in machine learning for proteins. To remedy this problem, we introduce OpenProteinSet, an open-source corpus of more than 16 million MSAs, associated structural homologs from the Protein Data Bank, and AlphaFold2 protein structure predictions. We have previously demonstrated the utility of OpenProteinSet by successfully retraining AlphaFold2 on it. We expect OpenProteinSet to be broadly useful as training and validation data for 1) diverse tasks focused on protein structure, function, and design and 2) large-scale multimodal machine learning research. Gustaf Ahdritz, Nazim Bouatta, Sachin Kadyan, Lukas Jarosch, Daniel Berenberg, Ian Fisk, Andrew M. Watkins, Stephen Ra, Richard Bonneau, Mohammed AlQuraishi |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2023 | 3D molecule generation by denoising voxel gridsabstractWe propose a new score-based approach to generate 3D molecules represented as atomic densities on regular grids.
First, we train a denoising neural network that learns to map from a smooth distribution of noisy molecules to the distribution of real molecules.
Then, we follow the _neural empirical Bayes_ framework [Saremi and Hyvarinen, 2019] and generate molecules in two steps: (i) sample noisy density grids from a smooth distribution via underdamped Langevin Markov chain Monte Carlo, and (ii) recover the "clean" molecule by denoising the noisy grid with a single step.
Our method, _VoxMol_, generates molecules in a fundamentally different way than the current state of the art (ie, diffusion models applied to atom point clouds). It differs in terms of the data representation, the noise model, the network architecture and the generative modeling algorithm.
Our experiments show that VoxMol captures the distribution of drug-like molecules better than state of the art, while being faster to generate samples. Pedro O. Pinheiro, Joshua A. Rackers, Joseph Kleinhenz, Michael Maser, Omar Mahmood, Andrew M. Watkins, Stephen Ra, Vishnu Sresht, Saeed Saremi |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2020 | Better together: Elements of successful scientific software development in a distributed collaborative communityabstractMany scientific disciplines rely on computational methods for data analysis, model generation, and prediction. Implementing these methods is often accomplished by researchers with domain expertise but without formal training in software engineering or computer science. This arrangement has led to underappreciation of sustainability and maintainability of scientific software tools developed in academic environments. Some software tools have avoided this fate, including the scientific library Rosetta. We use this software and its community as a case study to show how modern software development can be accomplished successfully, irrespective of subject area. Rosetta is one of the largest software suites for macromolecular modeling, with 3.1 million lines of code and many state-of-the-art applications. Since the mid 1990s, the software has been developed collaboratively by the RosettaCommons, a community of academics from over 60 institutions worldwide with diverse backgrounds including chemistry, biology, physiology, physics, engineering, mathematics, and computer science. Developing this software suite has provided us with more than two decades of experience in how to effectively develop advanced scientific software in a global community with hundreds of contributors. Here we illustrate the functioning of this development community by addressing technical aspects (like version control, testing, and maintenance), community-building strategies, diversity efforts, software dissemination, and user support. We demonstrate how modern computational research can thrive in a distributed collaborative community. The practices described here are independent of subject area and can be readily adopted by other software development communities. Julia Koehler Leman, Brian D. Weitzner, P. Douglas Renfrew, Steven M. Lewis, Rocco Moretti, Andrew M. Watkins, Vikram Khipple Mulligan, Sergey Lyskov, Jared Adolf-Bryfogle, Jason W. Labonte, Justyna Krys, Christopher Bystroff, William R. Schief, Dominik Gront, Ora Schueler-Furman, David Baker 0001, Philip Bradley, Roland L. Dunbrack Jr., Tanja Kortemme, Andrew Leaver-Fay, Charlie E. M. Strauss, Jens Meiler, Brian Kuhlman, Jeffrey J. Gray, Richard Bonneau |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 6 |
| 2013 | HippDB: a database of readily targeted helical protein-protein interactionsabstractSUMMARY: HippDB catalogs every protein-protein interaction whose structure is available in the Protein Data Bank and which exhibits one or more helices at the interface. The Web site accepts queries on variables such as helix length and sequence, and it provides computational alanine scanning and change in solvent-accessible surface area values for every interfacial residue. HippDB is intended to serve as a starting point for structure-based small molecule and peptidomimetic drug development. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: HippDB is freely available on the web at http://www.nyu.edu/projects/arora/hippdb. The Web site is implemented in PHP, MySQL and Apache. Source code freely available for download at http://code.google.com/p/helidb, implemented in Perl and supported on Linux. CONTACT: [email protected]. Christina M. Bergey, Andrew M. Watkins, Paramjit S. Arora |
Bioinform. | 2 |