VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yidan Xing 0001
dblp:136/5589-1
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3450-6486ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network optimization and economics · 70% Internet of things and sensor networks · 30% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 50% Security and privacy of machine learning · 25% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 25% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 80% Motion planning and robot control · 20% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › online decision making
reinforcement learning for advertising |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Auto-Coupon Framework for Advertiser Retention in Online Advertising · KDD (2) 2025 |
Network optimization and economics › pricing
data pricing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Designing Market Model and Pricing Mechanisms for IoT Data Exchange · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › iot data management
iot data sharing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Designing Market Model and Pricing Mechanisms for IoT Data Exchange · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024 |
Network optimization and economics › mechanism design
market design |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Designing Market Model and Pricing Mechanisms for IoT Data Exchange · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024 |
Network optimization and economics › resource allocation › market-based resource allocation
pricing mechanism |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Designing Market Model and Pricing Mechanisms for IoT Data Exchange · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
collaborative inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Preventing Strategic Behaviors in Collaborative Inference for Vertical Federated Learning · KDD 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
federated learning security |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Preventing Strategic Behaviors in Collaborative Inference for Vertical Federated Learning · KDD 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Preventing Strategic Behaviors in Collaborative Inference for Vertical Federated Learning · KDD 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning › federated learning privacy
vertical federated learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Preventing Strategic Behaviors in Collaborative Inference for Vertical Federated Learning · KDD 2024 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
auction design |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Truthful Auctions for Automated Bidding in Online Advertising · IJCAI 2023 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › auction design
truthful auction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Truthful Auctions for Automated Bidding in Online Advertising · IJCAI 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
feedback control |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | An Auto-Coupon Framework for Advertiser Retention in Online Advertising · KDD (2) 2025 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
iot data market |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On Designing Market Model and Pricing Mechanisms for IoT Data Exchange · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2024 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
mechanism design |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Preventing Strategic Behaviors in Collaborative Inference for Vertical Federated Learning · KDD 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
auto-bidding |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Truthful Auctions for Automated Bidding in Online Advertising · IJCAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.7feedback control · 1.7statistical two-sample test · 1.5distribution-based penalty · 1.5bayesian nash equilibrium · 1.5mechanism design · 1.3critical ROI computation · 1.3logarithmic approximation · 0.8information design · 0.8convex optimization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | An Auto-Coupon Framework for Advertiser Retention in Online AdvertisingabstractThe online advertising platform serves as the intermediary between advertisers and users to facilitate the product trading process and generate profits. While the vitality of both the user and advertiser community is crucial to the long-term development of platforms, compared with the enduring efforts to improve user experience, little attention has been given to methods for attracting or retaining advertisers. To address this oversight, in this work, we investigate the first intelligent solution to the advertiser retention problem in online advertising. Motivated by advertiser surveys and data analytics, we first define a set of short-term ad performance metrics as the key retention metrics we need to optimize for advertisers. In consideration of the desirable properties of a retention framework, we propose an Auto-Coupon module to distribute impression-level virtual coupons to selected advertisers during the bidding process. We decompose the resulted retention optimization problem into two stages, and adopt feedback control as well as reinforcement learning methods to realize personalized coupon distribution. The offline experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our methods in boosting the ad performance of churning advertisers, and the large-scale online A/B test further justifies the improvement in advertisers' willingness to stay in the platform. Yidan Xing 0001, Yangsu Liu, Dagui Chen, Zhenzhe Zheng 0001, Fan Wu 0006 |
KDD (2) | 1 |
| 2024 | Preventing Strategic Behaviors in Collaborative Inference for Vertical Federated LearningabstractVertical federated learning (VFL) is an emerging collaborative machine learning paradigm to facilitate the utilization of private features distributed across multiple parties. During the inference process of VFL, the involved parties need to upload their local embeddings to be aggregated for the final prediction. Despite its remarkable performances, the inference process of the current VFL system is vulnerable to the strategic behavior of involved parties, as they could easily change the uploaded local embeddings to exert direct influences on the prediction result. In a representative case study of federated recommendation, we find the allocation of display opportunities to be severely disrupted due to the parties' preferences in display content. In order to elicit the true local embeddings for VFL system, we propose a distribution-based penalty mechanism to detect and penalize the strategic behaviors in collaborative inference. As the key motivation of our design, we theoretically prove the power of constraining the distribution of uploaded embeddings in preventing the dishonest parties from achieving higher utility. Our mechanism leverages statistical two-sample tests to distinguish whether the distribution of uploaded embeddings is reasonable, and penalize the dishonest party through deactivating her uploaded embeddings. The resulted mechanism could be shown to admit truth-telling to converge to a Bayesian Nash equilibrium asymptotically under mild conditions. The experimental results further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed mechanism to reduce the dishonest utility increase of strategic behaviors and promote the truthful uploading of local embeddings in inferences. Yidan Xing 0001, Zhenzhe Zheng 0001, Fan Wu 0006 |
KDD | 1 |
| 2024 | On Designing Market Model and Pricing Mechanisms for IoT Data ExchangeabstractData is becoming an important kind of commercial good, and many online marketplaces are set up to facilitate the exchange of data. However, most existing data market models and the corresponding pricing mechanisms fail to capture the unique economic properties of data. In this paper, we first characterize the new features of IoT data as a digital commodity, and then present a market model for IoT data exchange, from an information design perspective. We further propose a family of data pricing mechanisms for maximizing revenue under different information asymmetry settings. OurMSimplemechanism extracts full surplus for the model with one type of buyer in the market. When multiple types of buyers coexist, ourMGeneralmechanism optimally solves the problem of revenue maximization by formulating it as a convex program with polynomial size. For a more practical setting where buyers have bounded rationality, we design theMPracticalmechanism with a tight logarithmic approximation ratio. We also show that the seller can further increase revenue by offering a free data trial to the buyers. We evaluate our pricing mechanisms on a real-world ambient sound dataset. Evaluation results demonstrate that our pricing mechanisms achieve good performance and approach the optimal revenue. Zhenzhe Zheng 0001, Weichao Mao, Yidan Xing 0001, Fan Wu 0006 |
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. | 3 |
| 2023 | Truthful Auctions for Automated Bidding in Online AdvertisingabstractAutomated bidding, an emerging intelligent decision-making paradigm powered by machine learning, has become popular in online advertising. Advertisers in automated bidding evaluate the cumulative utilities and have private financial constraints over multiple ad auctions in a long-term period. Based on these distinct features, we consider a new ad auction model for automated bidding: the values of advertisers are public while the financial constraints, such as budget and return on investment (ROI) rate, are private types. We derive the truthfulness conditions with respect to private constraints for this multi-dimensional setting, and demonstrate any feasible allocation rule could be equivalently reduced to a series of non-decreasing functions on budget. However, the resulted allocation mapped from these non-decreasing functions generally follows an irregular shape, making it difficult to obtain a closed-form expression for the auction objective. To overcome this design difficulty, we propose a family of truthful automated bidding auction with personalized rank scores, similar to the Generalized Second-Price (GSP) auction. The intuition behind our design is to leverage personalized rank scores as the criteria to allocate items, and compute a critical ROI to transforms the constraints on budget to the same dimension as ROI. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed auction mechanism outperforms the widely used ad auctions, such as first-price auction and second-price auction, in various automated bidding environments. Yidan Xing 0001, Zhilin Zhang 0003, Zhenzhe Zheng 0001, Chuan Yu 0002, Jian Xu 0015, Fan Wu 0006, Guihai Chen |
IJCAI | 1 |