Andrei Simion

dblp:136/9147 · also Andrei Arsene Simion · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Machine translation · 80% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 10% Optimization for machine learning · 10%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.942016
Towards a Convex HMM Surrogate for Word Alignment · EMNLP 2016
On A Strictly Convex IBM Model 1 · EMNLP 2015
A Family of Latent Variable Convex Relaxations for IBM Model 2 · AAAI 2015
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.742016
Towards a Convex HMM Surrogate for Word Alignment · EMNLP 2016
On A Strictly Convex IBM Model 1 · EMNLP 2015
A Convex Alternative to IBM Model 2 · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment
0.632016
Towards a Convex HMM Surrogate for Word Alignment · EMNLP 2016
On A Strictly Convex IBM Model 1 · EMNLP 2015
A Convex Alternative to IBM Model 2 · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation › word alignment
hidden markov model alignment
0.212016
Towards a Convex HMM Surrogate for Word Alignment · EMNLP 2016
Mathematical optimization › convex relaxation
convex surrogate loss
0.212016
Towards a Convex HMM Surrogate for Word Alignment · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convex relaxation
0.212015
A Family of Latent Variable Convex Relaxations for IBM Model 2 · AAAI 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.212015
A Family of Latent Variable Convex Relaxations for IBM Model 2 · AAAI 2015
Mathematical optimization
convex relaxation
0.212013
A Convex Alternative to IBM Model 2 · EMNLP 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

expectation-maximization · 0.9convex relaxation · 0.4subgradient method · 0.3exponentiated-gradient updates · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Adaptation of Embedding Models to Financial Filings Via LLM Distillation
Eliot Brenner, Dominic Seyler, Manjunath Hegde, Andrei Simion, Koustuv Dasgupta, Bing Xiang
IEEE Big Data4
2016 Towards a Convex HMM Surrogate for Word Alignment
Andrei Simion, Michael Collins 0001, Clifford Stein 0001
EMNLP1
2015 A Family of Latent Variable Convex Relaxations for IBM Model 2
abstract
Recently, a new convex formulation of IBM Model 2 was introduced. In this paper we develop the theory further and introduce a class of convex relaxations for latent variable models which include IBM Model 2. When applied to IBM Model 2, our relaxation class subsumes the previous relaxation as a special case. As proof of concept, we study a new relaxation of IBM Model 2 which is simpler than the previous algorithm: the new relaxation relies on the use of nothing more than a multinomial EM algorithm, does not require the tuning of a learning rate, and has some favorable comparisons to IBM Model 2 in terms of F-Measure. The ideas presented could be applied to a wide range of NLP and machine learning problems.
Andrei Simion, Michael Collins 0001, Clifford Stein 0001
AAAI1
2015 On A Strictly Convex IBM Model 1
abstract
IBM Model 1 is a classical alignment model.Of the first generation word-based SMT models, it was the only such model with a concave objective function.For concave optimization problems like IBM Model 1, we have guarantees on the convergence of optimization algorithms such as Expectation Maximization (EM).However, as was pointed out recently, the objective of IBM Model 1 is not strictly concave and there is quite a bit of alignment quality variance within the optimal solution set.In this work we detail a strictly concave version of IBM Model 1 whose EM algorithm is a simple modification of the original EM algorithm of Model 1 and does not require the tuning of a learning rate or the insertion of an l 2 penalty.Moreover, by addressing Model 1's shortcomings, we achieve AER and F-Measure improvements over the classical Model 1 by over 30%.
Andrei Simion, Michael Collins 0001, Clifford Stein 0001
EMNLP1
2014 Some Experiments with a Convex IBM Model 2
abstract
Using a recent convex formulation of IBM Model 2, we propose a new initialization scheme which has some favorable comparisons to the standard method of initializing IBM Model 2 with IBM Model 1.Additionally, we derive the Viterbi alignment for the convex relaxation of IBM Model 2 and show that it leads to better F-Measure scores than those of IBM Model 2.
Andrei Simion, Michael Collins 0001, Clifford Stein 0001
EACL1
2013 A Convex Alternative to IBM Model 2
abstract
The IBM translation models have been hugely influential in statistical machine translation; they are the basis of the alignment models used in modern translation systems.Excluding IBM Model 1, the IBM translation models, and practically all variants proposed in the literature, have relied on the optimization of likelihood functions or similar functions that are non-convex, and hence have multiple local optima.In this paper we introduce a convex relaxation of IBM Model 2, and describe an optimization algorithm for the relaxation based on a subgradient method combined with exponentiated-gradient updates.Our approach gives the same level of alignment accuracy as IBM Model 2.
Andrei Simion, Michael Collins 0001, Clifford Stein 0001
EMNLP1