Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph Gubbins

dblp:136/9190 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 87% Information extraction and text analysis · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › text infilling
sentence infilling
0.212013
Dependency Language Models for Sentence Completion · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
statistical language modeling
0.212013
Dependency Language Models for Sentence Completion · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
syntactic dependency
0.012013
Dependency Language Models for Sentence Completion · EMNLP 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

n-gram language model · 0.2dependency language models · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Dependency Language Models for Sentence Completion
abstract
Sentence completion is a challenging semantic modeling task in which models must choose the most appropriate word from a given set to complete a sentence.Although a variety of language models have been applied to this task in previous work, none of the existing approaches incorporate syntactic information.In this paper we propose to tackle this task using a pair of simple language models in which the probability of a sentence is estimated as the probability of the lexicalisation of a given syntactic dependency tree.We apply our approach to the Microsoft Research Sentence Completion Challenge and show that it improves on n-gram language models by 8.7 percentage points, achieving the highest accuracy reported to date apart from neural language models that are more complex and expensive to train.
Joseph Gubbins, Andreas Vlachos 0001
EMNLP1