Machine learning has become increasingly important in biomechanics. It allows to unveil hidden patterns from large and complex data, which leads to a more comprehensive understanding of biomechanical processes and deeper insights into human movement. However, machine learning models are often trained on a single dataset with a limited number of participants, which negatively affects their robustness and generalizability. Combining data from multiple existing sources provides an opportunity to overcome these limitations without spending more time on recruiting participants and recording new data. It is furthermore an opportunity for researchers who lack the financial requirements or laboratory equipment to conduct expensive motion capture studies themselves. At the same time, subtle interlaboratory differences can be problematic in an analysis due to the bias that they introduce. In our study, we investigated differences in motion capture datasets in the context of machine learning, for which we combined overground walking trials from four existing studies. Specifically, our goal was to examine whether a machine learning model was able to predict the original data source based on marker and GRF trajectories of single strides and how different scaling methods and pooling procedures affected the outcome. Layer-wise relevance propagation was applied to understand which factors were influential to distinguish the original data sources. We found that the model could predict the original data source with a very high accuracy (up to \({\gt}\) 99%), which decreased by about 15 percentage points when we scaled every dataset individually prior to pooling. However, none of the proposed scaling methods could fully remove the dataset bias. Layer-wise relevance propagation revealed that there was not only one single factor that differed between all datasets. Instead, every dataset had its unique characteristics that were picked up by the model. These variables differed between the scaling and pooling approaches but were mostly consistent between trials belonging to the same dataset. Our results show that motion capture data is sensitive even to small deviations in marker placement and experimental setup and that small inter-group differences should not be overinterpreted during data analysis, especially when the data was collected in different labs. Furthermore, we recommend scaling datasets individually prior to pooling them which led to the lowest accuracy. We want to raise awareness that differences in datasets always exist and are recognizable by machine learning models. Researchers should thus think about how these differences might affect their results when combining data from different studies.

The reuse of existing design models offers great potential in saving resources and generating an efficient workflow. In order to fully benefit from these advantages, it is necessary to develop methods that are able to retrieve mechanical engineering geometry from a query input. This paper aims to address this problem by presenting a method that focuses on the needs of product development to retrieve similar components by comparing the geometrical similarity of existing parts. Therefore, a method is described, which first converts surface meshes into point clouds, rotates them, and then transforms the results into matrices. These are subsequently passed to a pre-trained Deep Learning network to extract the feature vector. A similarity between different geometries is calculated and evaluated based on this vector. The procedure employs a new type of part alignment, especially developed for mechanical engineering geometries. The method is presented in detail and several parameters affecting the accuracy of the retrieval are discussed. This is followed by a critical comparison with other shape retrieval approaches through a mechanical engineering benchmark data set.

Reinforcement Learning has proven to be capable of solving complex tasks like playing video games, robotics control, speech or image recognition and processing. Transferring Reinforcement Learning into engineering design helps to overcome two current issues of data-driven Design Automation in engineering design. First, dealing with sparse training data resulting from differing design samples. Second, overcoming the limited number of samples in the training data as consequence of short or insufficient product history. To introduce an alternative approach for Design Automation, this contribution studies feasibility, training effort and transferability of Reinforcement Learning in engineering design. The presented method maps engineering requirements and parametric models into learning environments and provides a novel approach for design automation. In addition to that, the contribution summarises the hyperparameters, which design engineers have to set prior to training, and introduces a novel transfer learning concept for Reinforcement Learning in related design tasks. The support is probed by design tasks of performance-oriented bike parts. Case-independent indicators are presented to estimate the case-specific training effort, the effects of hyperparameter variation and the effects of transferring a pretrained agent to related design tasks. Finally, the findings are used to compare Reinforcement Learning to other data-independent Design Automation approaches to assess potential fields of application for Reinforcement Learning in engineering design.

Among the standard stages of the engineering design process, the principle solution can be regarded as an analogue of the design specification, fixing the way the final product works. It is usually constructed as an abstract sketch where the functional parts of the product are identified, and geometric and topological constraints are formulated. Here, we outline a semantic approach where the principle solution is annotated with ontological assertions, thus making the intended requirements explicit and available for further machine processing; this includes the automated detection of design errors in the final CAD model, making additional use of a background ontology of engineering knowledge.