Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chenwei Wu 0002

dblp:136/9723-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5226-7431ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 27% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Optimization for machine learning · 19%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive learning rate
1.422025
Adam-mini: Use Fewer Learning Rates To Gain More · ICLR 2025
Guarantees for Tuning the Step Size using a Learning-to-Learn Approach · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation
1.222023
Provably Learning Diverse Features in Multi-View Data with Midpoint Mixup · ICML 2023
Towards Understanding the Data Dependency of Mixup-style Training · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
mixup
1.222023
Provably Learning Diverse Features in Multi-View Data with Midpoint Mixup · ICML 2023
Towards Understanding the Data Dependency of Mixup-style Training · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory-efficient training
0.912025
Adam-mini: Use Fewer Learning Rates To Gain More · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › sparse coding
dictionary learning
0.712023
Hiding Data Helps: On the Benefits of Masking for Sparse Coding · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.712023
Connecting Pre-trained Language Model and Downstream Task via Properties of Representation · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multi-view learning
multi-view representation learning
0.712023
Provably Learning Diverse Features in Multi-View Data with Midpoint Mixup · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis
0.712023
Connecting Pre-trained Language Model and Downstream Task via Properties of Representation · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding
0.712023
Hiding Data Helps: On the Benefits of Masking for Sparse Coding · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
transfer learning theory
0.712023
Connecting Pre-trained Language Model and Downstream Task via Properties of Representation · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.512021
Guarantees for Tuning the Step Size using a Learning-to-Learn Approach · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning
0.512021
Guarantees for Tuning the Step Size using a Learning-to-Learn Approach · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
lazy training regime
0.412020
Beyond Lazy Training for Over-parameterized Tensor Decomposition · NeurIPS 2020
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix and tensor decomposition
tensor decomposition
0.412020
Beyond Lazy Training for Over-parameterized Tensor Decomposition · NeurIPS 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training
0.312025
Adam-mini: Use Fewer Learning Rates To Gain More · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization theory
0.212022
Towards Understanding the Data Dependency of Mixup-style Training · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent
0.112020
Beyond Lazy Training for Over-parameterized Tensor Decomposition · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mixup · 1.2hessian structure analysis · 0.9adamw · 0.9masking objective · 0.7log-linear model · 0.7empirical risk minimization · 0.7dictionary learning · 0.7convolutional network · 0.7anchor vector · 0.7empirical analysis · 0.6neural tangent kernel · 0.4gradient descent · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Adam-mini: Use Fewer Learning Rates To Gain More
abstract
We propose Adam-mini, an optimizer that achieves on-par or better performance than AdamW with $50$% less memory footprint. Adam-mini reduces memory by cutting down the learning rate resources in Adam (i.e., $1/\sqrt{v}$). By delving into the Hessian structure of neural nets, we find Adam’s $v$ might not function at its full potential as effectively as we expected. We find that $\geq 99.9$% of these learning rates in $v$ could be harmlessly removed if we (1) carefully partition the parameters into blocks following our proposed principle on Hessian structure; (2) assign a single but good learning rate to each parameter block. We then provide one simple way to find good learning rates and propose Adam-mini. Empirically, we verify that Adam-mini performs on par or better than AdamW on various language models sized from 39M to 13B for pre-training, supervised fine-tuning, and RLHF. The reduced memory footprint of Adam-mini also alleviates communication overheads among GPUs, thereby increasing throughput. For instance, Adam-mini achieves $49.6$% higher throughput than AdamW when pre-training Llama 2-7B on $2\times$ A800-80GB GPUs, which saves 33% wall-clock time for pre-training.
Yushun Zhang, Congliang Chen, Ziniu Li, Tian Ding, Chenwei Wu 0002, Diederik P. Kingma, Yinyu Ye 0001, Zhi-Quan Luo, Ruoyu Sun 0001
ICLR5
2023 Provably Learning Diverse Features in Multi-View Data with Midpoint Mixup
abstract
Mixup is a data augmentation technique that relies on training using random convex combinations of data points and their labels. In recent years, Mixup has become a standard primitive used in the training of state-of-the-art image classification models due to its demonstrated benefits over empirical risk minimization with regards to generalization and robustness. In this work, we try to explain some of this success from a feature learning perspective. We focus our attention on classification problems in which each class may have multiple associated features (or $\textit{views}$) that can be used to predict the class correctly. Our main theoretical results demonstrate that, for a non-trivial class of data distributions with two features per class, training a 2-layer convolutional network using empirical risk minimization can lead to learning only one feature for almost all classes while training with a specific instantiation of Mixup succeeds in learning both features for every class. We also show empirically that these theoretical insights extend to the practical settings of image benchmarks modified to have multiple features.
Muthu Chidambaram, Xiang Wang 0011, Chenwei Wu 0002, Rong Ge 0001
ICML3
2023 Hiding Data Helps: On the Benefits of Masking for Sparse Coding
abstract
Sparse coding, which refers to modeling a signal as sparse linear combinations of the elements of a learned dictionary, has proven to be a successful (and interpretable) approach in applications such as signal processing, computer vision, and medical imaging. While this success has spurred much work on provable guarantees for dictionary recovery when the learned dictionary is the same size as the ground-truth dictionary, work on the setting where the learned dictionary is larger (or $\textit{over-realized}$) with respect to the ground truth is comparatively nascent. Existing theoretical results in this setting have been constrained to the case of noise-less data. We show in this work that, in the presence of noise, minimizing the standard dictionary learning objective can fail to recover the elements of the ground-truth dictionary in the over-realized regime, regardless of the magnitude of the signal in the data-generating process. Furthermore, drawing from the growing body of work on self-supervised learning, we propose a novel masking objective for which recovering the ground-truth dictionary is in fact optimal as the signal increases for a large class of data-generating processes. We corroborate our theoretical results with experiments across several parameter regimes showing that our proposed objective also enjoys better empirical performance than the standard reconstruction objective.
Muthu Chidambaram, Chenwei Wu 0002, Yu Cheng 0002, Rong Ge 0001
ICML2
2023 Connecting Pre-trained Language Model and Downstream Task via Properties of Representation
abstract
Recently, researchers have found that representations learned by large-scale pre-trained language models are useful in various downstream tasks. However, there is little theoretical understanding of how pre-training performance is related to downstream task performance. In this paper, we analyze how this performance transfer depends on the properties of the downstream task and the structure of the representations. We consider a log-linear model where a word can be predicted from its context through a network having softmax as its last layer. We show that even if the downstream task is highly structured and depends on a simple function of the hidden representation, there are still cases when a low pre-training loss cannot guarantee good performance on the downstream task. On the other hand, we propose and empirically validate the existence of an ``anchor vector'' in the representation space, and show that this assumption, together with properties of the downstream task, guarantees performance transfer.
Chenwei Wu 0002, Holden Lee, Rong Ge 0001
NeurIPS1
2022 Towards Understanding the Data Dependency of Mixup-style Training
Muthu Chidambaram, Xiang Wang 0011, Yuzheng Hu, Chenwei Wu 0002, Rong Ge 0001
ICLR4
2021 Guarantees for Tuning the Step Size using a Learning-to-Learn Approach
abstract
Choosing the right parameters for optimization algorithms is often the key to their success in practice. Solving this problem using a learning-to-learn approach—using meta-gradient descent on a meta-objective based on the trajectory that the optimizer generates—was recently shown to be effective. However, the meta-optimization problem is difficult. In particular, the meta-gradient can often explode/vanish, and the learned optimizer may not have good generalization performance if the meta-objective is not chosen carefully. In this paper we give meta-optimization guarantees for the learning-to-learn approach on a simple problem of tuning the step size for quadratic loss. Our results show that the naïve objective suffers from meta-gradient explosion/vanishing problem. Although there is a way to design the meta-objective so that the meta-gradient remains polynomially bounded, computing the meta-gradient directly using backpropagation leads to numerical issues. We also characterize when it is necessary to compute the meta-objective on a separate validation set to ensure the generalization performance of the learned optimizer. Finally, we verify our results empirically and show that a similar phenomenon appears even for more complicated learned optimizers parametrized by neural networks.
Xiang Wang 0011, Chenwei Wu 0002, Rong Ge 0001
ICML3
2020 Beyond Lazy Training for Over-parameterized Tensor Decomposition
abstract
Over-parametrization is an important technique in training neural networks. In both theory and practice, training a larger network allows the optimization algorithm to avoid bad local optimal solutions. In this paper we study a closely related tensor decomposition problem: given an $l$-th order tensor in $(R^d)^{\otimes l}$ of rank $r$ (where $r\ll d$), can variants of gradient descent find a rank $m$ decomposition where $m > r$? We show that in a lazy training regime (similar to the NTK regime for neural networks) one needs at least $m = \Omega(d^{l-1})$, while a variant of gradient descent can find an approximate tensor when $m = O^*(r^{2.5l}\log d)$. Our results show that gradient descent on over-parametrized objective could go beyond the lazy training regime and utilize certain low-rank structure in the data.
Xiang Wang 0011, Chenwei Wu 0002, Jason D. Lee, Tengyu Ma 0001, Rong Ge 0001
NeurIPS2