Collaborative problem-solving under time pressure is common but difficult, as teams must generate ideas quickly, coordinate actions, and track progress. Generative AI offers new opportunities to assist, but we know little about how proactive agents affect the dynamics of real-time, co-located teamwork. We studied two forms of proactive support in digital escape rooms: a facilitator agent that offered summaries and group structures, and a peer agent that proposed ideas and answered queries. In a within-subjects study with 24 participants, we compared group performance and processes across three conditions: no AI, peer, and facilitator. Results show that the peer agent occasionally enhanced problem-solving by offering timely hints and memory support; however, it also disrupted flow, increased workload, and created over-reliance. In comparison, the facilitator agent provided light scaffolding but had a limited impact on outcomes. We provide design considerations for proactive generative AI agents based on our findings.

Many human activities are performed in groups—making decisions in workplace meetings, cooperating on a sports team, or meeting with friends for dinner. All these activities involve complex conditions and interaction processes that influence their outcomes in terms of performance, personal goals, and group objectives. As robots are increasingly being positioned within groups, improving these outcomes has emerged as an important application area in social robotics, particularly through robotic facilitation. Robot facilitators aim to elicit positive changes by deliberately influencing group processes. While research in this field has demonstrated that robots can effectively influence interpersonal dynamics, there remains a notable gap in consolidating these insights into a coherent understanding that can guide the design and development of better facilitators. We present a scoping review of literature targeting changes in interactions between multiple humans that are driven by intentional actions from robotic agents. To identify key considerations for the design of robot facilitators, we take inspiration from human group research theories to organize existing approaches. Our review includes 108 publications that meet our inclusion criteria, yielding 85 distinct application targets for group facilitation using robots. Based on the identified instances, we extract categories of possible application targets and a set of design concepts that can guide future work on robotic group facilitators.

This paper introduces CORAE, a novel web-based open-source tool for COntinuous Retrospective Affect Evaluation, designed to capture continuous affect data about interpersonal perceptions in dyadic interactions. Grounded in behavioral ecology perspectives of emotion, this approach replaces valence as the relevant rating dimension with approach and withdrawal, reflecting the degree to which behavior is perceived as increasing or decreasing social distance. We conducted a study to experimentally validate the efficacy of our platform with 24 participants. The tool’s effectiveness was tested in the context of dyadic negotiation, revealing insights about how interpersonal dynamics evolve over time. We find that the continuous affect rating method is consistent with individuals’ perception of the overall interaction. This paper contributes to the growing body of research on affective computing and offers a valuable tool for researchers interested in investigating the temporal dynamics of affect and emotion in social interactions.

The diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) in children is commonly accompanied by a diagnosis of sensory processing disorders. Abnormalities are usually reported in multiple sensory processing domains, showing a higher prevalence of unusual responses, particularly to tactile, auditory and visual stimuli. This paper discusses a novel robot-based framework designed to target sensory difficulties faced by children with ASD in a controlled setting. The setup consists of a number of sensory stations, together with two different robotic agents that navigate the stations and interact with the stimuli. These stimuli are designed to resemble real world scenarios that form a common part of one's everyday experiences. Given the strong interest of children with ASD in technology in general and robots in particular, we attempt to utilize our robotic platform to demonstrate socially acceptable responses to the stimuli in an interactive, pedagogical setting that encourages the child's social, motor and vocal skills, while providing a diverse sensory experience. A preliminary user study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the proposed framework, with a total of 18 participants (5 with ASD and 13 typically developing) between the ages of 4 and 12 years. We derive a measure of social engagement, based on which we evaluate the effectiveness of the robots and sensory stations in order to identify key design features that can improve social engagement in children.