Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Horst
dblp:137/6966
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › encryption › property-preserving encryption
format-preserving encryption |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | FAST: Secure and High Performance Format-Preserving Encryption and Tokenization · ASIACRYPT (3) 2021 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
symmetric cryptography |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | FAST: Secure and High Performance Format-Preserving Encryption and Tokenization · ASIACRYPT (3) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tweakable block cipher · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | FAST: Secure and High Performance Format-Preserving Encryption and Tokenization
F. Betül Durak, Henning Horst, Michael Horst, Serge Vaudenay |
ASIACRYPT (3) | 3 |
| 2017 | Comparing parallel hardware architectures for visually guided robot navigationabstractSummary Local visual homing methods are a family of algorithms for visually guided navigation on mobile robots. Within this family, the so‐called min‐warping algorithm yields very precise results but is rather compute‐intensive. For this reason, we developed several implementations of this algorithm for different parallel hardware architectures (multi‐core CPUs with SIMD extensions, graphics processing units (GPUs), field‐programmable gate array) to arrive at a fast and energy‐efficient solution which is suited for real‐time performance on mobile platforms with limited battery capacity. Because the min‐warping algorithm is also well suited as a general benchmark, we carried out a comprehensive comparison study which includes both speed and real‐power measurements and covers both low‐power processors and high‐end devices. Our findings suggest that field‐programmable gate arrays offer the most energy‐efficient platform for min‐warping in the area of low‐power processors, while GPUs take the lead in the area of high‐end devices. However, as soon as the full capabilities of modern CPUs (like vector execution units and multiple hardware threads) are used, the speedup advantage of GPUs goes down to the single digit range. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Wolfram Schenck, Michael Horst, Tim Tiedemann, Sergius Gaulik, Ralf Möller 0002 |
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. | 2 |