Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pirmin Braun

dblp:138/4898 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Approximation and online algorithms · 60% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 40%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › contract theory
delegation
1.422024
Delegated online search · Artif. Intell. 2024
Delegated Online Search · IJCAI 2023
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
1.422024
Delegated online search · Artif. Intell. 2024
Delegated Online Search · IJCAI 2023
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
online search
0.812024
Delegated online search · Artif. Intell. 2024
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Delegated online search
abstract
In a delegation problem, a principal P with commitment power tries to pick one out of n options. Each option is drawn independently from a known distribution. Instead of inspecting the options herself, P delegates the information acquisition to a rational and self-interested agent A. After inspection, A proposes one of the options, and P can accept or reject. Delegation is a classic setting in economic information design with many prominent applications, but the computational problems are only poorly understood. In this paper, we study a natural online variant of delegation, in which the agent searches through the options in an online fashion. For each option, he has to irrevocably decide if he wants to propose the current option or discard it, before seeing information on the next option(s). How can we design algorithms for P that approximate the utility of her best option in hindsight? We show that in general P can obtain a Θ(1/n)-approximation and extend this result to ratios of Θ(k/n) in case (1) A has a lookahead of k rounds, or (2) A can propose up to k different options. We provide fine-grained bounds independent of n based on three parameters. If the ratio of maximum and minimum utility for A is bounded by a factor α, we obtain an Ω(log⁡log⁡α/log⁡α)-approximation algorithm, and we show that this is best possible. Additionally, if P cannot distinguish options with the same value for herself, we show that ratios polynomial in 1/α cannot be avoided. If there are at most β different utility values for A, we show a Θ(1/β)-approximation. If the utilities of P and A for each option are related by a factor γ, we obtain an Ω(1/log⁡γ)-approximation, where O(log⁡log⁡γ/log⁡γ) is best possible.
Pirmin Braun, Niklas Hahn 0001, Martin Hoefer 0001, Conrad Schecker
Artif. Intell.1
2023 Delegated Online Search
abstract
In a delegation problem, a principal P with commitment power tries to pick one out of n options. Each option is drawn independently from a known distribution. Instead of inspecting the options herself, P delegates the information acquisition to a rational and self-interested agent A. After inspection, A proposes one of the options, and P can accept or reject. In this paper, we study a natural online variant of delegation, in which the agent searches through the options in an online fashion. How can we design algorithms for P that approximate the utility of her best option in hindsight? We show that P can obtain a Θ(1/n)-approximation and provide more fine-grained bounds independent of n based on two parameters. If the ratio of maximum and minimum utility for A is bounded by a factor α, we obtain an Ω(log log α / log α)-approximation algorithm and show that this is best possible. If P cannot distinguish options with the same value for herself, we show that ratios polynomial in 1/α cannot be avoided. If the utilities of P and A for each option are related by a factor β, we obtain an Ω(1 / log β)-approximation, and O(log log β / log β) is best possible.
Pirmin Braun, Niklas Hahn 0001, Martin Hoefer 0001, Conrad Schecker
IJCAI1