The famous k-Server Problem covers plenty of resource allocation scenarios, and several variations have been studied extensively for decades. However, to the best of our knowledge, no research has considered the problem if the servers are not identical and requests can express which specific servers should serve them. Therefore, we present a new model generalizing the k-Server Problem by preferences of the requests and proceed to study it in a uniform metric space for deterministic online algorithms (the special case of paging).

We consider a natural extension to the metric uncapacitated Facility Location Problem (FLP) in which requests ask for different commodities out of a finite set (S) of commodities. Ravi and Sinha (SODA 2004) introduced the model as the Multi-Commodity Facility Location Problem (MFLP) and considered it an offline optimization problem. The model itself is similar to the FLP: i.e., requests are located at points of a finite metric space and the task of an algorithm is to construct facilities and assign requests to facilities while minimizing the construction cost and the sum over all assignment distances. In addition, requests and facilities are heterogeneous; they request or offer multiple commodities out of S. A request has to be connected to a set of facilities jointly offering the commodities demanded by it. In comparison to the FLP, an algorithm has to decide not only if and where to place facilities, but also which commodities to offer at each. To the best of our knowledge we are the first to study the problem in its online variant in which requests, their positions and their commodities are not known beforehand but revealed over time. We present results regarding the competitive ratio. On the one hand, we show that heterogeneity influences the competitive ratio by developing a lower bound on the competitive ratio for any randomized online algorithm of (Ω( √|S| + log/n log log n)) that already holds for simple line metrics. Here, (n) is the number of requests. On the other side, we establish a deterministic (O(√|S| · log n))-competitive algorithm and a randomized (O(√|S| · log/n log log n))-competitive algorithm. Further, we show that when considering a more special class of cost functions for the construction cost of a facility, the competitive ratio decreases given by our deterministic algorithm depending on the function.

Abstract We extend the Mobile Server problem introduced in Feldkord and Meyer auf der Heide (TOPC 6(3), 14:1–14:17 2019) to a model where k identical mobile resources, here named servers, answer requests appearing at points in the Euclidean space. To reduce communication costs, the positions of the servers can be adapted by a limited distance ms per round for each server. The costs are measured similarly to the classical Page Migration problem: i.e., answering a request induces costs proportional to the distance to the nearest server, and moving a server induces costs proportional to the distance multiplied with a weight D. We show that, in our model, no online algorithm can have a constant competitive ratio: i.e., one which is independent of the input length n, even if an augmented moving distance of (1 + δ)ms is allowed for the online algorithm. Therefore we investigate a restriction of the power of the adversary dictating the sequence of requests: We demand locality of requests: i.e., that consecutive requests come from points in the Euclidean space with distance bounded by some constant mc. We show constant lower bounds on the competitiveness in this setting (independent of n, but dependent on k, ms and mc). On the positive side, we present a deterministic online algorithm with bounded competitiveness when an augmented moving distance and locality of requests is assumed. Our algorithm simulates any given algorithm for the classical k-Page Migration problem as guidance for its servers and extends it by a greedy move of one server in every round. The resulting competitive ratio is polynomial in the number of servers k, the ratio between mc and ms, the inverse of the augmentation factor 1/δ and the competitive ratio of the simulated k-Page Migration algorithm. We also show how to directly adapt the Double Coverage algorithm (Chrobak et al. SIAM J. Discrete Math. 4(2), 172–181 11) for the k-Server problem to receive an algorithm with improved competitiveness on the line.

Consider the continuous distributed monitoring model in which n distributed nodes, receiving individual data streams, are connected to a designated server. The server is asked to continuously monitor a function defined over the values observed across all streams while minimizing the communication. We study a variant in which the server is equipped with a broadcast channel and is supposed to keep track of an approximation of the set of nodes currently observing the k largest values. Such an approximate set is exact except for some imprecision in an ε-neighborhood of the k-th largest value. This approximation of the Top-k-Position Monitoring Problem is of interest in cases where marginal changes (e.g. due to noise) in observed values can be ignored so that monitoring an approximation is sufficient and can reduce communication. This paper extends our results from [6], where we have developed a filter-based online algorithm for the (exact) Top-k-Position Monitoring Problem. There we have presented a competitive analysis of our algorithm against an offline adversary that also is restricted to filter-based algorithms. Our new algorithms as well as their analyses use new methods. We analyze their competitiveness against adversaries that use both exact and approximate filter-based algorithms, and observe severe differences between the respective powers of these adversaries.

Consider n nodes connected to a single coordinator. Each node receives an individual online data stream of numbers and, at any point in time, the coordinator has to know the k nodes currently observing the largest values, for a given k between 1 and n. We design and analyze an algorithm that solves this problem while bounding the amount of messages exchanged between the nodes and the coordinator. Our algorithm employs the idea of using filters which, intuitively speaking, leads to few messages to be sent, if the new input is “similar” to the previous ones. The algorithm uses a number of messages that is on expectation by a factor of O ((log Δ + k) · log n) larger than that of an offline algorithm that sets filters in an optimal way, where Δ is upper bounded by the largest value observed by any node.