VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Freddie D. Witherden
dblp:139/0728 · also Freddie David Witherden
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 53% Trustworthy machine learning · 31% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 8% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 91% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 9% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI-generated content detection
AI-generated image detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated Images · NeurIPS 2020 |
Image and video processing
frequency domain analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated Images · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › world model
learned dynamics models |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deep Variational Koopman Models: Inferring Koopman Observations for Uncertainty-Aware Dynamics Modeling and Control · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deep Variational Koopman Models: Inferring Koopman Observations for Uncertainty-Aware Dynamics Modeling and Control · IJCAI 2019 |
Computational science and engineering
computational fluid dynamics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep Dynamical Modeling and Control of Unsteady Fluid Flows · NeurIPS 2018 |
Computational science and engineering › computational fluid dynamics
turbulence simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Towards green aviation with python at petascale · SC 2016 |
High-performance computing › scientific computing systems
computational fluid dynamics |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Towards green aviation with python at petascale · SC 2016 |
High-performance computing › large-scale simulation
petascale simulation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Towards green aviation with python at petascale · SC 2016 |
High-performance computing
unstructured mesh computation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Towards green aviation with python at petascale · SC 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › learning control
model learning for control |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Deep Variational Koopman Models: Inferring Koopman Observations for Uncertainty-Aware Dynamics Modeling and Control · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Deep Variational Koopman Models: Inferring Koopman Observations for Uncertainty-Aware Dynamics Modeling and Control · IJCAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder · 0.9generative adversarial network · 0.9fourier analysis · 0.9deep learning · 0.7runtime code generation · 0.5python-based solver · 0.5variational inference · 0.4koopman operator theory · 0.4model predictive control · 0.3koopman theory · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Fourier Spectrum Discrepancies in Deep Network Generated ImagesabstractAdvancements in deep generative models such as generative adversarial networks and variational autoencoders have resulted in the ability to generate realistic images that are visually indistinguishable from real images which raises concerns about their potential malicious usage. In this paper, we present an analysis of the high-frequency Fourier modes of real and deep network generated images and show that deep network generated images share an observable, systematic shortcoming in replicating the attributes of these high-frequency modes. Using this, we propose a novel detection method based on the frequency spectrum of the images which is able to achieve an accuracy of up to 99.2% in classifying real and deep network generated images from various GAN and VAE architectures on a dataset of 5000 images with as few as 8 training examples. Furthermore, we show the impact of image transformations such as compression, cropping, and resolution reduction on the classification accuracy and suggest a method for modifying the high-frequency attributes of deep network generated images to mimic real images. Tarik Dzanic, Karan Shah 0001, Freddie D. Witherden |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2019 | Deep Variational Koopman Models: Inferring Koopman Observations for Uncertainty-Aware Dynamics Modeling and ControlabstractKoopman theory asserts that a nonlinear dynamical system can be mapped to a linear system, where the Koopman operator advances observations of the state forward in time. However, the observable functions that map states to observations are generally unknown. We introduce the Deep Variational Koopman (DVK) model, a method for inferring distributions over observations that can be propagated linearly in time. By sampling from the inferred distributions, we obtain a distribution over dynamical models, which in turn provides a distribution over possible outcomes as a modeled system advances in time. Experiments show that the DVK model is effective at long-term prediction for a variety of dynamical systems. Furthermore, we describe how to incorporate the learned models into a control framework, and demonstrate that accounting for the uncertainty present in the distribution over dynamical models enables more effective control. Jeremy Morton, Freddie D. Witherden, Mykel J. Kochenderfer |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2018 | Deep Dynamical Modeling and Control of Unsteady Fluid FlowsabstractThe design of flow control systems remains a challenge due to the nonlinear nature of the equations that govern fluid flow. However, recent advances in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have enabled the simulation of complex fluid flows with high accuracy, opening the possibility of using learning-based approaches to facilitate controller design. We present a method for learning the forced and unforced dynamics of airflow over a cylinder directly from CFD data. The proposed approach, grounded in Koopman theory, is shown to produce stable dynamical models that can predict the time evolution of the cylinder system over extended time horizons. Finally, by performing model predictive control with the learned dynamical models, we are able to find a straightforward, interpretable control law for suppressing vortex shedding in the wake of the cylinder. Jeremy Morton, Antony Jameson, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Freddie D. Witherden |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2016 | Towards green aviation with python at petascaleabstractAccurate simulation of unsteady turbulent flow is critical for improved design of greener aircraft that are quieter and more fuel-efficient. We demonstrate application of PyFR, a Python based computational fluid dynamics solver, to petascale simulation of such flow problems. Rationale behind algorithmic choices, which offer increased levels of accuracy and enable sustained computation at up to 58% of peak DP-FLOP/s on unstructured grids, will be discussed in the context of modern hardware. A range of software innovations will also be detailed, including use of runtime code generation, which enables PyFR to efficiently target multiple platforms, including heterogeneous systems, via a single implementation. Finally, results will be presented from a fullscale simulation of flow over a low-pressure turbine blade cascade, along with weak/strong scaling statistics from the Piz Daint and Titan supercomputers, and performance data demonstrating sustained computation at up to 13.7 DP-PFLOP/s. Peter E. Vincent, Freddie D. Witherden, Brian C. Vermeire, Jin Seok Park, Arvind Iyer |
SC | 2 |