Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peter J. Sadowski

dblp:139/1305 · also Peter Sadowski · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
14ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-7354-5461ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 72% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 15% Learning theory · 14%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 78% Computational science and engineering · 22%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
backpropagation
0.722019
Learning in the Machine: Random Backpropagation and the Deep Learning Channel (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2019
Learning in the machine: Random backpropagation and the deep learning channel · Artif. Intell. 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically plausible learning
0.412019
Learning in the Machine: Random Backpropagation and the Deep Learning Channel (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
stochastic backpropagation
0.412019
Learning in the Machine: Random Backpropagation and the Deep Learning Channel (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
dropout
0.422014
The dropout learning algorithm · Artif. Intell. 2014
Understanding Dropout · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization and regularization
0.422014
The dropout learning algorithm · Artif. Intell. 2014
Understanding Dropout · NIPS 2013
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.422014
The dropout learning algorithm · Artif. Intell. 2014
Understanding Dropout · NIPS 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › comparative genomics
cross-species prediction
0.212015
Inter-species prediction of protein phosphorylation in the sbv IMPROVER species translation challenge · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems bioinformatics › pathway analysis
signaling pathway analysis
0.212015
Inter-species prediction of protein phosphorylation in the sbv IMPROVER species translation challenge · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
systems biology
0.212015
Inter-species prediction of protein phosphorylation in the sbv IMPROVER species translation challenge · Bioinform. 2015
Computational science and engineering
high energy physics
0.212014
Searching for Higgs Boson Decay Modes with Deep Learning · NIPS 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random backpropagation · 0.7sparse RBP · 0.4skipped RBP · 0.4adaptive RBP · 0.4event classification · 0.4deep learning · 0.4stochastic gradient descent · 0.4feedback alignment · 0.3transcriptomics · 0.2phosphoproteomics · 0.2machine learning · 0.2ensemble averaging · 0.2bernoulli gating · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Learning a Clinically-Relevant Concept Bottleneck for Lesion Detection in Breast Ultrasound
Arianna Bunnell, Yannik Glaser, Dustin Valdez, Thomas K. Wolfgruber, Aleen Altamirano, Carol Zamora González, Brenda Y. Hernandez, Peter J. Sadowski, John A. Shepherd 0002
MICCAI (3)8
2021 Evolution-Informed Neural Networks for Microbiome Data Analysis
abstract
Advances in metagenomic sequencing have provided an unprecedented view of the microbial world, but untangling the web of microbe interdependencies and the complex relationship between microbiome and host is a major challenge in biology. New statistical methods are needed to analyze metagenomic data and infer these relationships. Focusing on amplicon sequencing data, we present methods for leveraging phylogenetic information in deep neural network models and for transfer learning from large data repositories. This approach is demonstrated in experiments using data from the Earth Microbiome Project (EMP) and a dataset of 1500 samples from Waimea Valley on the island of Oahu, Hawaii.
Michael Ito, Yannik Glaser, Peter J. Sadowski
BIBM3
2021 Deep Learning for Predicting Significant Wave Height From Synthetic Aperture Radar
abstract
The Sentinel-1 satellites equipped with synthetic aperture radars (SARs) provide near-global coverage of the world's oceans every six days. We curate a data set of collocations between SAR and altimeter satellites and investigate the use of deep learning to predict significant wave height from SAR. While previous models for predicting geophysical quantities from SAR rely heavily on feature-engineering, our approach learns directly from low-level image cross-spectra. Training on collocations from 2015 to 2017, we demonstrate on test data from 2018 that deep learning reduces the state-of-the-art root mean squared error by 50%, from 0.6 to 0.3 m when compared to altimeter data. Furthermore, we isolate the contributions of different features to the model performance.
Brandon Quach, Yannik Glaser, Justin Edward Stopa, Alexis Mouche, Peter J. Sadowski
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.5
2019 Learning in the Machine: Random Backpropagation and the Deep Learning Channel (Extended Abstract)
abstract
Random backpropagation (RBP) is a variant of the backpropagation algorithm for training neural networks, where the transpose of the forward matrices are replaced by fixed random matrices in the calculation of the weight updates. It is remarkable both because of its effectiveness, in spite of using random matrices to communicate error information, and because it completely removes the requirement of maintaining symmetric weights in a physical neural system. To better understand RBP, we compare different algorithms in terms of the information available locally to each neuron. In the process, we derive several alternatives to RBP, including skipped RBP (SRBP), adaptive RBP (ARBP), sparse RBP, and study their behavior through simulations. These simulations show that many variants are also robust deep learning algorithms, but that the derivative of the transfer function is important in the learning rule. Finally, we prove several mathematical results including the convergence to fixed points of linear chains of arbitrary length, the convergence to fixed points of linear autoencoders with decorrelated data, the long-term existence of solutions for linear systems with a single hidden layer and convergence in special cases, and the convergence to fixed points of non-linear chains, when the derivative of the activation functions is included.
Pierre Baldi, Peter J. Sadowski, Zhiqin Lu
IJCAI2
2018 Learning in the machine: Random backpropagation and the deep learning channel
Pierre Baldi, Peter J. Sadowski, Zhiqin Lu
Artif. Intell.2
2018 Learning in the machine: Recirculation is random backpropagation
Pierre Baldi, Peter J. Sadowski
Neural Networks2
2017 Learning in the machine: The symmetries of the deep learning channel
Pierre Baldi, Peter J. Sadowski, Zhiqin Lu
Neural Networks2
2016 Revealing Fundamental Physics from the Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment Using Deep Neural Networks
abstract
Experiments in particle physics produce enormous quantities of data that must be analyzed and interpreted by teams of physicists. This analysis is often exploratory, where scientists are unable to enumerate the possible types of signal prior to performing the experiment. Thus, tools for summarizing, clustering, visualizing and classifying high-dimensional data are essential. In this work, we show that meaningful physical content can be revealed by transforming the raw data into a learned high-level representation using deep neural networks, with measurements taken at the Daya Bay Neutrino Experiment as a case study. We further show how convolutional deep neural networks can provide an effective classification filter with greater than 97% accuracy across different classes of physics events, significantly better than other machine learning approaches.
Evan Racah, Seyoon Ko, Peter J. Sadowski, Wahid Bhimji, Craig Tull, Sang-Yun Oh, Pierre Baldi, Prabhat
ICMLA3
2016 PANDA: Extreme Scale Parallel K-Nearest Neighbor on Distributed Architectures
abstract
Computing k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) is one of the core kernels used in many machine learning, data mining and scientific computing applications. Although kd-tree based O(log n) algorithms have been proposed for computing KNN, due to its inherent sequentiality, linear algorithms are being used in practice. This limits the applicability of such methods to millions of data points, with limited scalability for Big Data analytics challenges in the scientific domain. In this paper, we present parallel and highly optimized kd*tree based KNN algorithms (both construction and querying) suitable for distributed architectures. Our algorithm includes novel approaches for pruning search space and improving load balancing and partitioning among nodes and threads. Using TB-sized datasets from three science applications: astrophysics, plasma physics, and particle physics, we show that our implementation can construct kd-tree of 189 billion particles in 48 seconds on utilizing ~50,000 cores. We also demonstrate computation of KNN of 19 billion queries in 12 seconds. We demonstrate almost linear speedup both for shared and distributed memory computers. Our algorithms outperforms earlier implementations by more than order of magnitude, thereby radically improving the applicability of our implementation to state-of-the-art Big Data analytics problems.
Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Nadathur Satish, Narayanan Sundaram, Jialin Liu 0002, Peter J. Sadowski, Evan Racah, Surendra Byna, Craig Tull, Wahid Bhimji, Prabhat, Pradeep Dubey
IPDPS5
2016 A theory of local learning, the learning channel, and the optimality of backpropagation
Pierre Baldi, Peter J. Sadowski
Neural Networks2
2015 Inter-species prediction of protein phosphorylation in the sbv IMPROVER species translation challenge
abstract
MOTIVATION: Animal models are widely used in biomedical research for reasons ranging from practical to ethical. An important issue is whether rodent models are predictive of human biology. This has been addressed recently in the framework of a series of challenges designed by the systems biology verification for Industrial Methodology for Process Verification in Research (sbv IMPROVER) initiative. In particular, one of the sub-challenges was devoted to the prediction of protein phosphorylation responses in human bronchial epithelial cells, exposed to a number of different chemical stimuli, given the responses in rat bronchial epithelial cells. Participating teams were asked to make inter-species predictions on the basis of available training examples, comprising transcriptomics and phosphoproteomics data. RESULTS: Here, the two best performing teams present their data-driven approaches and computational methods. In addition, post hoc analyses of the datasets and challenge results were performed by the participants and challenge organizers. The challenge outcome indicates that successful prediction of protein phosphorylation status in human based on rat phosphorylation levels is feasible. However, within the limitations of the computational tools used, the inclusion of gene expression data does not improve the prediction quality. The post hoc analysis of time-specific measurements sheds light on the signaling pathways in both species. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A detailed description of the dataset, challenge design and outcome is available at www.sbvimprover.com. The code used by team IGB is provided under http://github.com/uci-igb/improver2013. Implementations of the algorithms applied by team AMG are available at http://bhanot.biomaps.rutgers.edu/wiki/AMG-sc2-code.zip. CONTACT: [email protected].
Michael Biehl, Peter J. Sadowski, Gyan Bhanot, Erhan Bilal, Adel Dayarian, Pablo Meyer 0001, Raquel Norel, Kahn Rhrissorrakrai, Michael D. Zeller, Sahand Hormoz
Bioinform.2
2014 Searching for Higgs Boson Decay Modes with Deep Learning
Peter J. Sadowski, Daniel Whiteson, Pierre Baldi
NIPS1
2014 The dropout learning algorithm
abstract
Dropout is a recently introduced algorithm for training neural network by randomly dropping units during training to prevent their co-adaptation. A mathematical analysis of some of the static and dynamic properties of dropout is provided using Bernoulli gating variables, general enough to accommodate dropout on units or connections, and with variable rates. The framework allows a complete analysis of the ensemble averaging properties of dropout in linear networks, which is useful to understand the non-linear case. The ensemble averaging properties of dropout in non-linear logistic networks result from three fundamental equations: (1) the approximation of the expectations of logistic functions by normalized geometric means, for which bounds and estimates are derived; (2) the algebraic equality between normalized geometric means of logistic functions with the logistic of the means, which mathematically characterizes logistic functions; and (3) the linearity of the means with respect to sums, as well as products of independent variables. The results are also extended to other classes of transfer functions, including rectified linear functions. Approximation errors tend to cancel each other and do not accumulate. Dropout can also be connected to stochastic neurons and used to predict firing rates, and to backpropagation by viewing the backward propagation as ensemble averaging in a dropout linear network. Moreover, the convergence properties of dropout can be understood in terms of stochastic gradient descent. Finally, for the regularization properties of dropout, the expectation of the dropout gradient is the gradient of the corresponding approximation ensemble, regularized by an adaptive weight decay term with a propensity for self-consistent variance minimization and sparse representations.
Pierre Baldi, Peter J. Sadowski
Artif. Intell.2
2013 Understanding Dropout
abstract
Dropout is a relatively new algorithm for training neural networks which relies on stochastically dropping out'' neurons during training in order to avoid the co-adaptation of feature detectors. We introduce a general formalism for studying dropout on either units or connections, with arbitrary probability values, and use it to analyze the averaging and regularizing properties of dropout in both linear and non-linear networks. For deep neural networks, the averaging properties of dropout are characterized by three recursive equations, including the approximation of expectations by normalized weighted geometric means. We provide estimates and bounds for these approximations and corroborate the results with simulations. We also show in simple cases how dropout performs stochastic gradient descent on a regularized error function."
Pierre Baldi, Peter J. Sadowski
NIPS2