VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maren Westkott
dblp:139/1345
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 46% Learning paradigms · 23% Learning theory · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › brain-inspired learning
associative learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Perfect Associative Learning with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
perceptron |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Perfect Associative Learning with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › spiking neural network
spike-timing-dependent plasticity |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Perfect Associative Learning with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
spiking neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Perfect Associative Learning with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity · NIPS 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spike-timing-dependent plasticity · 0.2hebbian learning · 0.2anti-hebbian learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Perfect Associative Learning with Spike-Timing-Dependent PlasticityabstractRecent extensions of the Perceptron, as e.g. the Tempotron, suggest that this theoretical concept is highly relevant also for understanding networks of spiking neurons in the brain. It is not known, however, how the computational power of the Perceptron and of its variants might be accomplished by the plasticity mechanisms of real synapses. Here we prove that spike-timing-dependent plasticity having an anti-Hebbian form for excitatory synapses as well as a spike-timing-dependent plasticity of Hebbian shape for inhibitory synapses are sufficient for realizing the original Perceptron Learning Rule if the respective plasticity mechanisms act in concert with the hyperpolarisation of the post-synaptic neurons. We also show that with these simple yet biologically realistic dynamics Tempotrons are efficiently learned. The proposed mechanism might underly the acquisition of mappings of spatio-temporal activity patterns in one area of the brain onto other spatio-temporal spike patterns in another region and of long term memories in cortex. Our results underline that learning processes in realistic networks of spiking neurons depend crucially on the interactions of synaptic plasticity mechanisms with the dynamics of participating neurons. Christian Albers, Maren Westkott, Klaus Pawelzik |
NIPS | 2 |