VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ari Pakman
dblp:139/1387
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 75% Generative modeling · 12% Representation and self-supervised learning · 12% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Clustering via Self-Supervised Diffusion · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › clustering-based representation learning
self-supervised clustering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Clustering via Self-Supervised Diffusion · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 Stochastic Bouncy Particle Sampler · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.7 | 3 | 2017 | Stochastic Bouncy Particle Sampler · ICML 2017 Partition Functions from Rao-Blackwellized Tempered Sampling · ICML 2016 Auxiliary-variable Exact Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Samplers for Binary Distributions · NIPS 2013 |
Information theory › information measures › information decomposition
partial information decomposition |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Estimating the Unique Information of Continuous Variables · NeurIPS 2021 |
Information theory › information measures › information decomposition
synergy and redundancy |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Estimating the Unique Information of Continuous Variables · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian nonparametric model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › clustering
neural clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
posterior inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.3 | 2 | 2013 | Bayesian Inference and Online Experimental Design for Mapping Neural Microcircuits · NIPS 2013 Auxiliary-variable Exact Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Samplers for Binary Distributions · NIPS 2013 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience |
0.3 | 2 | 2020 | Bayesian Inference and Online Experimental Design for Mapping Neural Microcircuits · NIPS 2013 Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
non-reversible markov chain |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Stochastic Bouncy Particle Sampler · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
partition function estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Partition Functions from Rao-Blackwellized Tempered Sampling · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
experimental design |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Bayesian Inference and Online Experimental Design for Mapping Neural Microcircuits · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
hamiltonian monte carlo |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Auxiliary-variable Exact Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Samplers for Binary Distributions · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › sparse bayesian learning
spike-and-slab prior |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Auxiliary-variable Exact Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Samplers for Binary Distributions · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Estimating the Unique Information of Continuous Variables · NeurIPS 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
spike sorting |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Neural Clustering Processes · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Partition Functions from Rao-Blackwellized Tempered Sampling · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › boltzmann machine
restricted boltzmann machine |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Partition Functions from Rao-Blackwellized Tempered Sampling · ICML 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder optimization · 1.0copula decomposition · 1.0vision transformer features · 0.9teacher-student training · 0.9stochastic diffusion sampling · 0.9deep network · 0.9amortized inference · 0.9stochastic gradient · 0.3rejection-free sampling · 0.3annealed importance sampling · 0.2optimal design · 0.2bayesian inference · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Consistent Amortized Clustering via Generative Flow NetworksabstractNeural models for amortized probabilistic clustering yield samples of cluster labels given a set-structured input, while avoiding lengthy Markov chain runs and the need for explicit data likelihoods. Existing methods which label each data point sequentially, like the Neural Clustering Process, often lead to cluster assignments highly dependent on the data order. Alternatively, methods that sequentially create full clusters, do not provide assignment probabilities. In this paper, we introduce GFNCP, a novel framework for amortized clustering. GFNCP is formulated as a Generative Flow Network with a shared energy-based parametrization of policy and reward. We show that the flow matching conditions are equivalent to consistency of the clustering posterior under marginalization, which in turn implies order invariance. GFNCP also outperforms existing methods in clustering performance on both synthetic and real-world data. Irit Chelly, Roy Uziel, Oren Freifeld, Ari Pakman |
AISTATS | 4 |
| 2025 | Bayesian Circular Regression with von Mises Quasi-ProcessesabstractThe need for regression models to predict circular values arises in many scientific fields. In this work we explore a family of expressive and interpretable distributions over circle-valued random functions related to Gaussian processes targeting two Euclidean dimensions conditioned on the unit circle. The probability model has connections with continuous spin models in statistical physics. Moreover, its density is very simple and has maximum-entropy, unlike previous Gaussian process-based approaches, which use wrapping or radial marginalization. For posterior inference, we introduce a new Stratonovich-like augmentation that lends itself to fast Gibbs sampling. We argue that transductive learning in these models favors a Bayesian approach to the parameters and apply our sampling scheme to the Double Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. We present experiments applying this model to the prediction of (i) wind directions and (ii) the percentage of the running gait cycle as a function of joint angles. Yarden Cohen, Alexandre K. W. Navarro, Jes Frellsen, Richard E. Turner, Raziel Riemer, Ari Pakman |
AISTATS | 6 |
| 2025 | Clustering via Self-Supervised DiffusionabstractDiffusion models, widely recognized for their success in generative tasks, have not yet been applied to clustering. We introduce Clustering via Diffusion (CLUDI), a self-supervised framework that combines the generative power of diffusion models with pre-trained Vision Transformer features to achieve robust and accurate clustering. CLUDI is trained via a teacher–student paradigm: the teacher uses stochastic diffusion-based sampling to produce diverse cluster assignments, which the student refines into stable predictions. This stochasticity acts as a novel data augmentation strategy, enabling CLUDI to uncover intricate structures in high-dimensional data. Extensive evaluations on challenging datasets demonstrate that CLUDI achieves state-of-the-art performance in unsupervised classification, setting new benchmarks in clustering robustness and adaptability to complex data distributions. Roy Uziel, Irit Chelly, Oren Freifeld, Ari Pakman |
ICML | 4 |
| 2021 | Estimating the Unique Information of Continuous VariablesabstractThe integration and transfer of information from multiple sources to multiple targets is a core motive of neural systems. The emerging field of partial information decomposition (PID) provides a novel information-theoretic lens into these mechanisms by identifying synergistic, redundant, and unique contributions to the mutual information between one and several variables. While many works have studied aspects of PID for Gaussian and discrete distributions, the case of general continuous distributions is still uncharted territory. In this work we present a method for estimating the unique information in continuous distributions, for the case of one versus two variables. Our method solves the associated optimization problem over the space of distributions with fixed bivariate marginals by combining copula decompositions and techniques developed to optimize variational autoencoders. We obtain excellent agreement with known analytic results for Gaussians, and illustrate the power of our new approach in several brain-inspired neural models. Our method is capable of recovering the effective connectivity of a chaotic network of rate neurons, and uncovers a complex trade-off between redundancy, synergy and unique information in recurrent networks trained to solve a generalized XOR~task. Ari Pakman, Amin Nejatbakhsh, Dar Gilboa, Abdullah Makkeh, Luca Mazzucato, Michael Wibral, Elad Schneidman |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Neural Clustering ProcessesabstractProbabilistic clustering models (or equivalently, mixture models) are basic building blocks in countless statistical models and involve latent random variables over discrete spaces. For these models, posterior inference methods can be inaccurate and/or very slow. In this work we introduce deep network architectures trained with labeled samples from any generative model of clustered datasets. At test time, the networks generate approximate posterior samples of cluster labels for any new dataset of arbitrary size. We develop two complementary approaches to this task, requiring either O(N) or O(K) network forward passes per dataset, where N is the dataset size and K the number of clusters. Unlike previous approaches, our methods sample the labels of all the data points from a well-defined posterior, and can learn nonparametric Bayesian posteriors since they do not limit the number of mixture components. As a scientific application, we present a novel approach to neural spike sorting for high-density multielectrode arrays. Ari Pakman, Catalin Mitelut, Jin Hyung Lee, Liam Paninski |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | Stochastic Bouncy Particle SamplerabstractWe introduce a stochastic version of the non-reversible, rejection-free Bouncy Particle Sampler (BPS), a Markov process whose sample trajectories are piecewise linear, to efficiently sample Bayesian posteriors in big datasets. We prove that in the BPS no bias is introduced by noisy evaluations of the log-likelihood gradient. On the other hand, we argue that efficiency considerations favor a small, controllable bias, in exchange for faster mixing. We introduce a simple method that controls this trade-off. We illustrate these ideas in several examples which outperform previous approaches. Ari Pakman, Dar Gilboa, David E. Carlson, Liam Paninski |
ICML | 1 |
| 2016 | Partition Functions from Rao-Blackwellized Tempered SamplingabstractPartition functions of probability distributions are important quantities for model evaluation and comparisons. We present a new method to compute partition functions of complex and multimodal distributions. Such distributions are often sampled using simulated tempering, which augments the target space with an auxiliary inverse temperature variable. Our method exploits the multinomial probability law of the inverse temperatures, and provides estimates of the partition function in terms of a simple quotient of Rao-Blackwellized marginal inverse temperature probability estimates, which are updated while sampling. We show that the method has interesting connections with several alternative popular methods, and offers some significant advantages. In particular, we empirically find that the new method provides more accurate estimates than Annealed Importance Sampling when calculating partition functions of large Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBM); moreover, the method is sufficiently accurate to track training and validation log-likelihoods during learning of RBMs, at minimal computational cost. David E. Carlson, Patrick Stinson, Ari Pakman, Liam Paninski |
ICML | 3 |
| 2016 | Taming the Noise in Reinforcement Learning via Soft Updates
Roy Fox, Ari Pakman, Naftali Tishby |
UAI | 2 |
| 2013 | Auxiliary-variable Exact Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Samplers for Binary DistributionsabstractWe present a new approach to sample from generic binary distributions, based on an exact Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm applied to a piecewise continuous augmentation of the binary distribution of interest. An extension of this idea to distributions over mixtures of binary and continuous variables allows us to sample from posteriors of linear and probit regression models with spike-and-slab priors and truncated parameters. We illustrate the advantages of these algorithms in several examples in which they outperform the Metropolis or Gibbs samplers. Ari Pakman, Liam Paninski |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2013 | Bayesian Inference and Online Experimental Design for Mapping Neural MicrocircuitsabstractWe develop an inference and optimal design procedure for recovering synaptic weights in neural microcircuits. We base our procedure on data from an experiment in which populations of putative presynaptic neurons can be stimulated while a subthreshold recording is made from a single postsynaptic neuron. We present a realistic statistical model which accounts for the main sources of variability in this experiment and allows for large amounts of information about the biological system to be incorporated if available. We then present a simpler model to facilitate online experimental design which entails the use of efficient Bayesian inference. The optimized approach results in equal quality posterior estimates of the synaptic weights in roughly half the number of experimental trials under experimentally realistic conditions, tested on synthetic data generated from the full model. Benjamin Shababo, Brooks Paige, Ari Pakman, Liam Paninski |
NIPS | 3 |