Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Pekarovskiy

dblp:139/3810 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-9630-9904ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 4 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 66% Robot manipulation · 34%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model-based control
computed torque control
0.312018
Dynamically Consistent Online Adaptation of Fast Motions for Robotic Manipulators · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
motion control
0.312018
Dynamically Consistent Online Adaptation of Fast Motions for Robotic Manipulators · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.312018
Dynamically Consistent Online Adaptation of Fast Motions for Robotic Manipulators · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.322015
Online deformation of optimal trajectories for constrained nonprehensile manipulation · ICRA 2015
Robust trajectory design for object throwing based on sensitivity for model uncertainties · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation
nonprehensile manipulation
0.212015
Online deformation of optimal trajectories for constrained nonprehensile manipulation · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation › nonprehensile manipulation
object throwing
0.212015
Robust trajectory design for object throwing based on sensitivity for model uncertainties · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation › nonprehensile manipulation
dynamic manipulation
0.212014
Resonance-driven dynamic manipulation: Dribbling and juggling with elastic beam · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.212014
Resonance-driven dynamic manipulation: Dribbling and juggling with elastic beam · ICRA 2014
Robotics › Robot manipulation
physical human-robot interaction
0.112018
Dynamically Consistent Online Adaptation of Fast Motions for Robotic Manipulators · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
constrained motion planning
0.112015
Online deformation of optimal trajectories for constrained nonprehensile manipulation · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spline interpolation · 0.3bernstein polynomial · 0.3monte carlo simulation · 0.2linearized sensitivity analysis · 0.2convex hull · 0.2boundary constraint · 0.2vibration control · 0.2resonant mode analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Dynamically Consistent Online Adaptation of Fast Motions for Robotic Manipulators
abstract
The planning and execution of real-world robotic tasks largely depends on the ability to generate feasible motions online in response to changing environment conditions or goals. A spline deformation method is able to modify a given trajectory so that it matches the new boundary conditions, e.g., on positions, velocities, accelerations, etc. At the same time, the deformed motion preserves velocity, acceleration, jerk, or higher derivatives of motion profile of the precalculated trajectory. The deformed motion possessing such properties can be expressed by translation of original trajectory and spline interpolation. This spline decomposition considerably reduces the computational complexity and allows real-time execution. Formal feasibility guarantees are provided for the deformed trajectory and for the resulting torques. These guarantees are based on the special properties of Bernstein polynomials used for the deformation and on the structure of the chosen computed-torque control scheme. The approach is experimentally evaluated in a number of planar volleyball experiments using 3 degree-of-freedom robots and human participants.
Alexander Pekarovskiy, Thomas Nierhoff, Sandra Hirche, Martin Buss
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2015 Robust trajectory design for object throwing based on sensitivity for model uncertainties
abstract
Throwing an object by a powered robot system is of great importance in unmanned environments. In this paper, we consider the problem of throwing a point-mass object to minimize uncertainty in the object's landing position, given uncertainty in (1) the robot's initial configuration and (2) friction at the joints. Our analysis assumes that the robot's throw is executed using open-loop torque commands, and it relies on the linearized sensitivities of (a) landing location with respect to release state, (b) release state with respect to initial robot configuration and (c) joint friction. Moreover, the effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated by Monte-Carlo simulations.
Masafumi Okada, Alexander Pekarovskiy, Martin Buss
ICRA2
2015 Online deformation of optimal trajectories for constrained nonprehensile manipulation
abstract
This paper discusses an online dynamic motion generation scheme for nonprehensile object manipulation by using a set of predefined motions and a trajectory deformation algorithm capable of incorporating positional and velocity boundary constraints. By creating optimal trajectories offline and deforming them online, computational complexity during execution is reduced considerably. As tight convex hulls of the deformed trajectories can be found, possible obstacles or workspace boundaries can be circumnavigated precisely without collision. The approach is verified through experiments on an inclined planar air-table for volleyball scenario using two 3-DoF robots.
Alexander Pekarovskiy, Thomas Nierhoff, Jochen Schenek, Yoshihiko Nakamura, Sandra Hirche, Martin Buss
ICRA1
2014 Resonance-driven dynamic manipulation: Dribbling and juggling with elastic beam
abstract
This paper presents a new device and a method for dynamic manipulation. The device consists of a planar robotic arm and an elastic beam as an end-effector. Using it the elastic end-effector will tend to increase performance and energy efficiency while executing dynamic and repetitive tasks. Through the control of the beam vibration and resonant modes, we modify the state of manipulated objects. For lightweight objects the control is provided through the intermittent contacts without changing dynamics of the beam. However, we show that by using proper synchronization technique continuous-phase contacts are also possible. Juggling and dribbling of a ball are considered to be an alternating non-prehensile catching and throwing task. Such alternating decelerating and accelerating impacts on the ball and the curvature of the beam at the time of impact will stabilize the cyclic orbit of the ball. By proper analysis of continuous-time contact and dynamics of the beam we establish a rhythmic movement of the system. With the variation of frequency and amplitude of the beam it is possible to switch between different dynamic actions such as juggling, dribbling, throwing, catching and balancing.
Alexander Pekarovskiy, Kunal Saluja, Rohan Sarkar, Martin Buss
ICRA1
2014 Hierarchical robustness approach for nonprehensile catching of rigid objects
abstract
Catching is one of the most complex tasks in the area of dynamic manipulation. Exact information on the position and orientation of a rigid object is crucial in order to accomplish manipulation tasks. Both motion planner and control strategy use these data to achieve the desired contact of a predefined surface with a nonprehensile end-effector, e.g. flat plate. This paper presents a multi-level approach for robust task planning and execution for planar catching of rigid bodies. On the top level the choice of the best catching strategy is made. Different catching actions are introduced and classified based on relative translational and rotational velocities between the end-effector and the object. A motion planner is implemented on the middle level that produces smooth motion trajectories depending on the chosen strategy. Yet, some uncertainties occur during task execution due to sensory data, trajectory tracking and unmodeled dynamics. Therefore, a robust tracking control is implemented on the bottom level to guarantee task execution in presence of uncertainty in robot parameters. A sustainable framework is being used taking the dynamics of the robot, the object and the environment into account to create a consistent and versatile catching system.
Alexander Pekarovskiy, Ferdinand Stockmann, Masafumi Okada, Martin Buss
IROS1
2013 Optimal control goal manifolds for planar nonprehensile throwing
abstract
This paper presents a throwing motion planner based on a goal manifold for two-point boundary value problem. The article outlines algorithmic and geometric issues for planar throwing of rigid objects with a nonprehensile end-effector. Special attention is paid to the challenge of controlling a desired 6-dimensional state of the object with a planar 3-DoF robot. Modeling of the contacts is discussed using a state vector of the coupled robot and object dynamics. Robustness against uncertainty due to varying model parameters such as object inertia and friction between the end-effector and the object is investigated. An approach for obtaining manifolds of terminal constraints from the goal configuration is described. Classification of these constraints is given. Finally, feasible trajectory generation conditions for successful execution of the generated optimal controls are discussed.
Alexander Pekarovskiy, Martin Buss
IROS1