Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

T. K. Kumaran

dblp:139/6807 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 50% Distributed systems · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms
0.011995
Graph-theoretic deadlock detection and resolution for flexible manufacturing systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995
Distributed systems › concurrency control
deadlock detection
0.011995
Graph-theoretic deadlock detection and resolution for flexible manufacturing systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995
Distributed systems › concurrency control
deadlock resolution
0.011995
Graph-theoretic deadlock detection and resolution for flexible manufacturing systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995
Embedded and real-time systems › industrial control systems › manufacturing system control
flexible manufacturing system control
0.011995
Graph-theoretic deadlock detection and resolution for flexible manufacturing systems · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

system status graph · 0.0graph theory · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Graph-theoretic deadlock detection and resolution for flexible manufacturing systems
abstract
Flexible manufacturing systems are capable of producing a broad variety of products and changing their characteristics quickly and frequently. This flexibility provides for more efficient use of resources, but makes control of these systems more difficult. Control problems previously unstudied now require practical resolution, like system deadlock. A system deadlock is a situation that arises due to resource sharing in manufacturing systems, when the flow of parts is permanently inhibited and/or operations on parts cannot be performed. This problem has been ignored by most scheduling and control studies, which usually assume infinite machine queue capacity and unlimited tooling resources. FMS's, however, have little or no queue capacity and limited tooling resources. In this paper, graph-theoretic deadlock detection and resolution procedures are presented which are suitable for real-time control of manufacturing systems. These procedures determine whether part movement in the system causes system deadlock or not. To this end, a system status graph representing part routings is virtually updated for every part movement before parts move physically to the next destination. Two types of system deadlocks, part flow deadlock and impending part flow deadlock, are detected using the updated system status graph. If a deadlock detection and recovery method is used to recover from a deadlock using a storage buffer, only part flow deadlocks need to be detected. On the other hand, if no buffer is available, both types of existing as well as impending system deadlocks need to be detected to avoid a deadlock situation.>
Hyunbo Cho, T. K. Kumaran, Richard A. Wysk
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.2