VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arthur van Goethem
dblp:139/8102
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
8as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 5 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Computational geometry · 80% Algorithms and data structures · 20% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics › geospatial visualization
cartographic visualization |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Exploring Curved Schematization of Territorial Outlines · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2015 Stenomaps: Shorthand for shapes · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2014 |
Computational geometry
graph drawing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Optimal Morphs of Planar Orthogonal Drawings · SoCG 2018 |
Computational geometry › graph drawing
morphing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Optimal Morphs of Planar Orthogonal Drawings · SoCG 2018 |
Visualization and visual analytics
time series analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-Granular Trend Detection for Time-Series Analysis · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2017 |
Visualization and visual analytics › temporal data visualization
time-varying data visualization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-Granular Trend Detection for Time-Series Analysis · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2017 |
Visualization and visual analytics › data exploration
trend discovery |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Multi-Granular Trend Detection for Time-Series Analysis · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2017 |
Computational geometry › graph drawing
planar graph drawing |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Optimal Morphs of Planar Orthogonal Drawings · SoCG 2018 |
Visualization and visual analytics
interactive data exploration |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Grouping Time-Varying Data for Interactive Exploration · SoCG 2016 |
Visualization and visual analytics
usability and user experience research |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Exploring Curved Schematization of Territorial Outlines · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2015 |
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization evaluation
user study |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Exploring Curved Schematization of Territorial Outlines · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2015 |
Visualization and visual analytics › geospatial visualization
thematic maps |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Stenomaps: Shorthand for shapes · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
upper and lower bounds · 0.5wire · 0.3spirality · 0.3linear morph · 0.3interactive selection brushes · 0.3geometric modeling · 0.3data structures · 0.2data structure · 0.2area-preserving polygon simplification · 0.2spline generation · 0.2medial axis · 0.2dynamic programming · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Optimal Morphs of Planar Orthogonal Drawings II
Arthur van Goethem, Bettina Speckmann, Kevin Verbeek |
GD | 1 |
| 2018 | Optimal Morphs of Planar Orthogonal DrawingsabstractWe describe an algorithm that morphs between two planar orthogonal drawings Gamma_I and Gamma_O of a connected graph G, while preserving planarity and orthogonality. Necessarily Gamma_I and Gamma_O share the same combinatorial embedding. Our morph uses a linear number of linear morphs (linear interpolations between two drawings) and preserves linear complexity throughout the process, thereby answering an open question from Biedl et al. [Biedl et al., 2013]. Our algorithm first unifies the two drawings to ensure an equal number of (virtual) bends on each edge. We then interpret bends as vertices which form obstacles for so-called wires: horizontal and vertical lines separating the vertices of Gamma_O. We can find corresponding wires in Gamma_I that share topological properties with the wires in Gamma_O. The structural difference between the two drawings can be captured by the spirality of the wires in Gamma_I, which guides our morph from Gamma_I to Gamma_O. Arthur van Goethem, Kevin Verbeek |
SoCG | 1 |
| 2018 | Competitive Searching for a Line on a Line ArrangementabstractWe discuss the problem of searching for an unknown line on a known or unknown line arrangement by a searcher S, and show that a search strategy exists that finds the line competitively, that is, with detour factor at most a constant when compared to the situation where S has all knowledge. In the case where S knows all lines but not which one is sought, the strategy is 79-competitive. We also show that it may be necessary to travel on Omega(n) lines to realize a constant competitive ratio. In the case where initially, S does not know any line, but learns about the ones it encounters during the search, we give a 414.2-competitive search strategy. Quirijn W. Bouts, Thom Castermans, Arthur van Goethem, Marc J. van Kreveld, Wouter Meulemans |
ISAAC | 3 |
| 2017 | The Painter's Problem: Covering a Grid with Colored Connected Polygons
Arthur van Goethem, Irina Kostitsyna, Marc J. van Kreveld, Wouter Meulemans, Max Sondag, Jules Wulms |
GD | 1 |
| 2017 | Multi-Granular Trend Detection for Time-Series AnalysisabstractTime series (such as stock prices) and ensembles (such as model runs for weather forecasts) are two important types of one-dimensional time-varying data. Such data is readily available in large quantities but visual analysis of the raw data quickly becomes infeasible, even for moderately sized data sets. Trend detection is an effective way to simplify time-varying data and to summarize salient information for visual display and interactive analysis. We propose a geometric model for trend-detection in one-dimensional time-varying data, inspired by topological grouping structures for moving objects in two- or higher-dimensional space. Our model gives provable guarantees on the trends detected and uses three natural parameters: granularity, support-size, and duration. These parameters can be changed on-demand. Our system also supports a variety of selection brushes and a time-sweep to facilitate refined searches and interactive visualization of (sub-)trends. We explore different visual styles and interactions through which trends, their persistence, and evolution can be explored. Arthur van Goethem, Frank Staals, Maarten Löffler, Jason Dykes, Bettina Speckmann |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 1 |
| 2016 | Grouping Time-Varying Data for Interactive ExplorationabstractWe present algorithms and data structures that support the interactive analysis of the grouping structure of one-, two-, or higher-dimensional time-varying data while varying all defining parameters. Grouping structures characterise important patterns in the temporal evaluation of sets of time-varying data. We follow Buchin et al. [JoCG 2015] who define groups using three parameters: group-size, group-duration, and inter-entity distance. We give upper and lower bounds on the number of maximal groups over all parameter values, and show how to compute them efficiently. Furthermore, we describe data structures that can report changes in the set of maximal groups in an output-sensitive manner. Our results hold in R^d for fixed d. Arthur van Goethem, Marc J. van Kreveld, Maarten Löffler, Bettina Speckmann, Frank Staals |
SoCG | 1 |
| 2015 | Exploring Curved Schematization of Territorial OutlinesabstractHand-drawn schematized maps traditionally make extensive use of curves. However, there are few automated approaches for curved schematization; most previous work focuses on straight lines. We present a new algorithm for area-preserving curved schematization of territorial outlines. Our algorithm converts a simple polygon into a schematic crossing-free representation using circular arcs. We use two basic operations to iteratively replace consecutive arcs until the desired complexity is reached. Our results are not restricted to arcs ending at input vertices. The method can be steered towards different degrees of "curviness": we can encourage or discourage the use of arcs with a large central angle via a single parameter. Our method creates visually pleasing results even for very low output complexities. To evaluate the effectiveness of our design choices, we present a geometric evaluation of the resulting schematizations. Besides the geometric qualities of our algorithm, we also investigate the potential of curved schematization as a concept. We conducted an online user study investigating the effectiveness of curved schematizations compared to straight-line schematizations. While the visual complexity of curved shapes was judged higher than that of straight-line shapes, users generally preferred curved schematizations. We observed that curves significantly improved the ability of users to match schematized shapes of moderate complexity to their unschematized equivalents. Arthur van Goethem, Wouter Meulemans, Bettina Speckmann, Jo Wood |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 1 |
| 2014 | Exploring Curved SchematizationabstractHand-drawn schematized maps traditionally make extensive use of curves. However, there are few automated approaches for curved schematization most previous work focuses on straight lines. We present a new algorithm for area-preserving curved schematization of geographic outlines. Our algorithm converts a simple polygon into a schematic crossing-free representation using circular arcs. We use two basic operations to iteratively replace consecutive arcs until the desired complexity is reached. Our results are not restricted to arcs ending at input vertices. The method can be steered towards different degrees of 'curviness': we can encourage or discourage the use of arcs with a large central angle via a single parameter. Our method creates visually pleasing results even for very low output complexities. We conducted an online user study investigating the effectiveness of the curved schematizations compared to straight-line schematizations of equivalent complexity. While the visual complexity of the curved shapes was judged higher than those using straight lines, users generally preferred curved schematizations. We observed that curves significantly improved the ability of users to match schematized shapes of moderate complexity to their unschematized equivalents. Arthur van Goethem, Wouter Meulemans, Bettina Speckmann, Jo Wood |
PacificVis | 1 |
| 2014 | Stenomaps: Shorthand for shapesabstractWe address some of the challenges in representing spatial data with a novel form of geometric abstraction-the stenomap. The stenomap comprises a series of smoothly curving linear glyphs that each represent both the boundary and the area of a polygon. We present an efficient algorithm to automatically generate these open, C1-continuous splines from a set of input polygons. Feature points of the input polygons are detected using the medial axis to maintain important shape properties. We use dynamic programming to compute a planar non-intersecting spline representing each polygon's base shape. The results are stylised glyphs whose appearance may be parameterised and that offer new possibilities in the 'cartographic design space'. We compare our glyphs with existing forms of geometric schematisation and discuss their relative merits and shortcomings. We describe several use cases including the depiction of uncertain model data in the form of hurricane track forecasting; minimal ink thematic mapping; and the depiction of continuous statistical data. Arthur van Goethem, Andreas W. Reimer, Bettina Speckmann, Jo Wood |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 1 |
| 2013 | Accentuating focus maps via partial schematizationabstractWe present an algorithm for schematized focus maps. Focus maps integrate a high detailed, enlarged focus region continuously in a given base map. Recent methods integrate both with such low distortion that the focus region becomes hard to identify. We combine focus maps with partial schematization to display distortion of the context and to emphasize the focus region. Schematization visually conveys geographical accuracy, while not increasing map complexity. We extend the focus-map algorithm to incorporate geometric proximity relationships and show how to combine focus maps with schematization in order to cater to different use cases. Thomas C. van Dijk, Arthur van Goethem, Jan-Henrik Haunert, Wouter Meulemans, Bettina Speckmann |
SIGSPATIAL/GIS | 2 |