Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexandre Papadopoulos
dblp:14/3330
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
7as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 7 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 5 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 38% Optimization for machine learning · 38% Language models and text generation · 24% | |
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 35% Algorithms and data structures · 28% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 28% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
constraint programming |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generalized Confidence Constraints · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
robust optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Generalized Confidence Constraints · AAAI 2023 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
combinatorics on words |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Generating all Possible Palindromes from Ngram Corpora · IJCAI 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
decision diagram optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Generalized Confidence Constraints · AAAI 2023 |
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Representative Explanations for Over-Constrained Problems · AAAI 2007 |
Mathematical optimization › constrained optimization
over-constrained problems |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Representative Explanations for Over-Constrained Problems · AAAI 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-valued decision diagrams · 1.3constraint propagation · 1.3voss constraint · 0.4n-gram language modeling · 0.4generalized arc consistency · 0.2automaton construction · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Generalized Confidence ConstraintsabstractIn robust optimization, finding a solution that solely respects the constraints is not enough. Usually, the uncertainty and unknown parameters of the model are represented by random variables. In such conditions, a good solution is a solution robust to most-likely assignments of these random variables. Recently, the Confidence constraint has been introduced by Mercier-Aubin et al. in order to enforce this type of robustness in constraint programming. Unfortunately, it is restricted to a conjunction of binary inequalities In this paper, we generalize the Confidence constraint to any constraint and propose an implementation based on Multi-valued Decision Diagrams (MDDs). The Confidence constraint is defined over a vector of random variables. For a given constraint C, and given a threshold, the Confidence constraint ensures that the probability for C to be satisfied by a sample of the random variables is greater than the threshold. We propose to use MDDs to represent the constraints on the random variables. MDDs are an efficient tool for representing combinatorial constraints, thanks to their exponential compression power. Here, both random and decision variables are stored in the MDD, and propagation rules are proposed for removing values of decision variables that cannot lead to robust solutions. Furthermore, for several constraints, we show that decision variables can be omitted from the MDD because lighter filtering algorithms are sufficient. This leads to gain an exponential factor in the MDD size. The experimental results obtained on a chemical deliveries problem in factories – where the chemicals consumption are uncertain – shows the efficiency of the proposed approach. Guillaume Perez, Steve Malalel, Gaël Glorian, Victor Jung, Alexandre Papadopoulos, Marie Pelleau, Wijnand Suijlen, Jean-Charles Régin, Arnaud Lallouet |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2022 | A Deep Reinforcement Learning Heuristic for SAT based on Antagonist Graph Neural NetworksabstractHeuristics are one of the most important tools to guide search to solve combinatorial problems. They are often specifically designed for one single problem and require both expertise and implementation work. Generic frameworks like SAT or CSP have developed heuristics that obey general principles like first fail or are able to learn and adapt from the exploration of the search tree like Dom/wDeg. In SAT, the classic VSIDS heuristic falls into both categories. The question of whether it is possible to learn from solving existing problems has been addressed for a long time by portfolio solvers where the best heuristic is chosen by Machine Learning from hand-crafted features, and more recently with Deep Learning by embedding this knowledge into a Graph Neural Network (GNN). In this paper, we build upon the latter category by proposing a new heuristic based on Deep Reinforcement Learning using two GNNs with adversarial rewards. We show that our method reduces the number of fails to get the first solution by more than 50% compared to MiniSat. This work shows the advantages of this type of techniques to extract structural and contextual knowledge from past solving experience. Thomas Fournier, Arnaud Lallouet, Télio Cropsal, Gaël Glorian, Alexandre Papadopoulos, Antoine Petitet, Guillaume Perez, Suruthy Sekar, Wijnand Suijlen |
ICTAI | 5 |
| 2016 | Assisted Lead Sheet Composition Using FlowComposer
Alexandre Papadopoulos, Pierre Roy, François Pachet |
CP | 1 |
| 2016 | Enforcing Structure on Temporal Sequences: The Allen Constraint
Pierre Roy, Guillaume Perez, Jean-Charles Régin, Alexandre Papadopoulos, François Pachet, Marco Marchini |
CP | 4 |
| 2015 | Exact Sampling for Regular and Markov Constraints with Belief Propagation
Alexandre Papadopoulos, François Pachet, Pierre Roy, Jason Sakellariou |
CP | 1 |
| 2015 | Generating 1/f Noise Sequences as Constraint Satisfaction: The Voss Constraint
François Pachet, Pierre Roy, Alexandre Papadopoulos, Jason Sakellariou |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2015 | Generating all Possible Palindromes from Ngram Corpora
Alexandre Papadopoulos, Pierre Roy, Jean-Charles Régin, François Pachet |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2014 | Avoiding Plagiarism in Markov Sequence GenerationabstractMarkov processes are widely used to generate sequences that imitate a given style, using random walk. Random walk generates sequences by iteratively concatenating states to prefixes of length equal or less than the given Markov order}. However, at higher orders, Markov chains tend to replicate chunks of the corpus with a size possibly higher than the order, a primary form of plagiarism. The Markov order defines a maximum length for training but not for generation. In the framework of constraint satisfaction (CSP), we introduce MaxOrder. This global constraint ensures that generated sequences do not include chunks larger than a given maximum order. We exhibit an automaton that recognises the solution set, with a size linear in the size of the corpus. We propose a linear-time procedure to generate this automaton from a corpus and a given max order. We then use this automaton to achieve generalised arc consistency for the MaxOrder constraint, holding on a sequence of size n, in O(n.T) time, where T is the size of the automaton. We illustrate our approach by generating text sequences from text corpora with a maximum order guarantee, effectively controlling plagiarism. Alexandre Papadopoulos, Pierre Roy, François Pachet |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2012 | Compiling Domain ConsequencesabstractThis paper presents a method for computing all the domain consequences of a constraint satisfaction problem. Domain consequences are a generalisation of prime implicates to multi-valued constraint problems. We define ordered automata to encode a large, potentially exponential, number of domain consequences. We design a range of algorithms that directly operate on this compact representation, with a complexity that depends on its size and not the size of the encoded set. This allows us to generate the domain consequences of a problem even for problems that have an exponential number of domain consequences. Furthermore, a simple empirical study illustrates the effectiveness of the method in compiling a large number of domain consequences, and the compactness of this representation. Alexandre Papadopoulos, Barry O'Sullivan |
ICTAI | 1 |
| 2009 | Compiling All Possible Conflicts of a CSP
Alexandre Papadopoulos, Barry O'Sullivan |
CP | 1 |
| 2008 | Relaxations for Compiled Over-Constrained Problems
Alexandre Papadopoulos, Barry O'Sullivan |
CP | 1 |
| 2007 | Representative Explanations for Over-Constrained Problems
Barry O'Sullivan, Alexandre Papadopoulos, Boi Faltings, Pearl Pu |
AAAI | 2 |