Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexandre Papadopoulos

dblp:14/3330 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
7as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 7 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 5 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 38% Optimization for machine learning · 38% Language models and text generation · 24%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Mathematical optimization · 35% Algorithms and data structures · 28% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 28%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
constraint programming
0.712023
Generalized Confidence Constraints · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
robust optimization
0.712023
Generalized Confidence Constraints · AAAI 2023
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
combinatorics on words
0.212015
Generating all Possible Palindromes from Ngram Corpora · IJCAI 2015
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
decision diagram optimization
0.212023
Generalized Confidence Constraints · AAAI 2023
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction
0.112007
Representative Explanations for Over-Constrained Problems · AAAI 2007
Mathematical optimization › constrained optimization
over-constrained problems
0.112007
Representative Explanations for Over-Constrained Problems · AAAI 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-valued decision diagrams · 1.3constraint propagation · 1.3voss constraint · 0.4n-gram language modeling · 0.4generalized arc consistency · 0.2automaton construction · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Generalized Confidence Constraints
abstract
In robust optimization, finding a solution that solely respects the constraints is not enough. Usually, the uncertainty and unknown parameters of the model are represented by random variables. In such conditions, a good solution is a solution robust to most-likely assignments of these random variables. Recently, the Confidence constraint has been introduced by Mercier-Aubin et al. in order to enforce this type of robustness in constraint programming. Unfortunately, it is restricted to a conjunction of binary inequalities In this paper, we generalize the Confidence constraint to any constraint and propose an implementation based on Multi-valued Decision Diagrams (MDDs). The Confidence constraint is defined over a vector of random variables. For a given constraint C, and given a threshold, the Confidence constraint ensures that the probability for C to be satisfied by a sample of the random variables is greater than the threshold. We propose to use MDDs to represent the constraints on the random variables. MDDs are an efficient tool for representing combinatorial constraints, thanks to their exponential compression power. Here, both random and decision variables are stored in the MDD, and propagation rules are proposed for removing values of decision variables that cannot lead to robust solutions. Furthermore, for several constraints, we show that decision variables can be omitted from the MDD because lighter filtering algorithms are sufficient. This leads to gain an exponential factor in the MDD size. The experimental results obtained on a chemical deliveries problem in factories – where the chemicals consumption are uncertain – shows the efficiency of the proposed approach.
Guillaume Perez, Steve Malalel, Gaël Glorian, Victor Jung, Alexandre Papadopoulos, Marie Pelleau, Wijnand Suijlen, Jean-Charles Régin, Arnaud Lallouet
AAAI5
2022 A Deep Reinforcement Learning Heuristic for SAT based on Antagonist Graph Neural Networks
abstract
Heuristics are one of the most important tools to guide search to solve combinatorial problems. They are often specifically designed for one single problem and require both expertise and implementation work. Generic frameworks like SAT or CSP have developed heuristics that obey general principles like first fail or are able to learn and adapt from the exploration of the search tree like Dom/wDeg. In SAT, the classic VSIDS heuristic falls into both categories. The question of whether it is possible to learn from solving existing problems has been addressed for a long time by portfolio solvers where the best heuristic is chosen by Machine Learning from hand-crafted features, and more recently with Deep Learning by embedding this knowledge into a Graph Neural Network (GNN). In this paper, we build upon the latter category by proposing a new heuristic based on Deep Reinforcement Learning using two GNNs with adversarial rewards. We show that our method reduces the number of fails to get the first solution by more than 50% compared to MiniSat. This work shows the advantages of this type of techniques to extract structural and contextual knowledge from past solving experience.
Thomas Fournier, Arnaud Lallouet, Télio Cropsal, Gaël Glorian, Alexandre Papadopoulos, Antoine Petitet, Guillaume Perez, Suruthy Sekar, Wijnand Suijlen
ICTAI5
2016 Assisted Lead Sheet Composition Using FlowComposer
Alexandre Papadopoulos, Pierre Roy, François Pachet
CP1
2016 Enforcing Structure on Temporal Sequences: The Allen Constraint
Pierre Roy, Guillaume Perez, Jean-Charles Régin, Alexandre Papadopoulos, François Pachet, Marco Marchini
CP4
2015 Exact Sampling for Regular and Markov Constraints with Belief Propagation
Alexandre Papadopoulos, François Pachet, Pierre Roy, Jason Sakellariou
CP1
2015 Generating 1/f Noise Sequences as Constraint Satisfaction: The Voss Constraint
François Pachet, Pierre Roy, Alexandre Papadopoulos, Jason Sakellariou
IJCAI3
2015 Generating all Possible Palindromes from Ngram Corpora
Alexandre Papadopoulos, Pierre Roy, Jean-Charles Régin, François Pachet
IJCAI1
2014 Avoiding Plagiarism in Markov Sequence Generation
abstract
Markov processes are widely used to generate sequences that imitate a given style, using random walk. Random walk generates sequences by iteratively concatenating states to prefixes of length equal or less than the given Markov order}. However, at higher orders, Markov chains tend to replicate chunks of the corpus with a size possibly higher than the order, a primary form of plagiarism. The Markov order defines a maximum length for training but not for generation. In the framework of constraint satisfaction (CSP), we introduce MaxOrder. This global constraint ensures that generated sequences do not include chunks larger than a given maximum order. We exhibit an automaton that recognises the solution set, with a size linear in the size of the corpus. We propose a linear-time procedure to generate this automaton from a corpus and a given max order. We then use this automaton to achieve generalised arc consistency for the MaxOrder constraint, holding on a sequence of size n, in O(n.T) time, where T is the size of the automaton. We illustrate our approach by generating text sequences from text corpora with a maximum order guarantee, effectively controlling plagiarism.
Alexandre Papadopoulos, Pierre Roy, François Pachet
AAAI1
2012 Compiling Domain Consequences
abstract
This paper presents a method for computing all the domain consequences of a constraint satisfaction problem. Domain consequences are a generalisation of prime implicates to multi-valued constraint problems. We define ordered automata to encode a large, potentially exponential, number of domain consequences. We design a range of algorithms that directly operate on this compact representation, with a complexity that depends on its size and not the size of the encoded set. This allows us to generate the domain consequences of a problem even for problems that have an exponential number of domain consequences. Furthermore, a simple empirical study illustrates the effectiveness of the method in compiling a large number of domain consequences, and the compactness of this representation.
Alexandre Papadopoulos, Barry O'Sullivan
ICTAI1
2009 Compiling All Possible Conflicts of a CSP
Alexandre Papadopoulos, Barry O'Sullivan
CP1
2008 Relaxations for Compiled Over-Constrained Problems
Alexandre Papadopoulos, Barry O'Sullivan
CP1
2007 Representative Explanations for Over-Constrained Problems
Barry O'Sullivan, Alexandre Papadopoulos, Boi Faltings, Pearl Pu
AAAI2