Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hao Luo 0023
dblp:14/3727-23
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-9528-1786ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Language models and text generation · 50% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
long-context reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AdaMix: Adaptive Mixing for Short and Long Reasoning Adapters · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | AdaMix: Adaptive Mixing for Short and Long Reasoning Adapters · ACL (1) 2026 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Guiding LLM-based Smart Contract Generation with Finite State Machine · IJCAI 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation › domain-specific code generation
smart contract generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Guiding LLM-based Smart Contract Generation with Finite State Machine · IJCAI 2025 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
smart contract security |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Guiding LLM-based Smart Contract Generation with Finite State Machine · IJCAI 2025 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › smart contract security
vulnerability detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Guiding LLM-based Smart Contract Generation with Finite State Machine · IJCAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 1.7large language model · 1.7finite state machine · 1.7mixture of adapters · 1.0adaptive mixing · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | AdaMix: Adaptive Mixing for Short and Long Reasoning AdaptersabstractHao Luo, Xiao Yan, Xinyan Li, Qiming Zeng, Yuhao Lin, Shanshan Feng, Hao Wang, Jiawei Jiang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Hao Luo 0023, Xiao Yan 0002, Qiming Zeng, Shanshan Feng 0001, Hao Wang 0013, Jiawei Jiang 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Guiding LLM-based Smart Contract Generation with Finite State MachineabstractSmart contract is a kind of self-executing code based on blockchain technology with a wide range of application scenarios, but the traditional generation method relies on manual coding and expert auditing, which has a high threshold and low efficiency. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) show great potential in programming tasks, they still face challenges in smart contract generation w.r.t. effectiveness and security. To solve these problems, we propose FSM-SCG, a smart contract generation framework based on finite state machine (FSM) and LLMs, which significantly improves the quality of the generated code by abstracting user requirements to generate FSM, guiding LLMs to generate smart contracts, and iteratively optimizing the code with the feedback of compilation and security checks. The experimental results show that FSM-SCG significantly improves the quality of smart contract generation. Compared to the best baseline, FSM-SCG improves the compilation success rate of generated smart contract code by at most 48%, and reduces the average vulnerability risk score by approximately 68%. Hao Luo 0023, Xiao Yan 0002, Xintong Hu, Yuxiang Wang 0013, Qiming Zeng, Hao Wang 0013, Jiawei Jiang 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |