BACKGROUND: The development of high throughput sequencing techniques provides us with the possibilities to obtain large data sets, which capture the effect of dynamic perturbations on cellular processes. However, because of the dynamic nature of these processes, the analysis of the results is challenging. Therefore, there is a great need for bioinformatics tools that address this problem. RESULTS: Here we present DynOVis, a network visualization tool that can capture dynamic dose-over-time effects in biological networks. DynOVis is an integrated work frame of R packages and JavaScript libraries and offers a force-directed graph network style, involving multiple network analysis methods such as degree threshold, but more importantly, it allows for node expression animations as well as a frame-by-frame view of the dynamic exposure. Valuable biological information can be highlighted on the nodes in the network, by the integration of various databases within DynOVis. This information includes pathway-to-gene associations from ConsensusPathDB, disease-to-gene associations from the Comparative Toxicogenomics databases, as well as Entrez gene ID, gene symbol, gene synonyms and gene type from the NCBI database. CONCLUSIONS: DynOVis could be a useful tool to analyse biological networks which have a dynamic nature. It can visualize the dynamic perturbations in biological networks and allows the user to investigate the changes over time. The integrated data from various online databases makes it easy to identify the biological relevance of nodes in the network. With DynOVis we offer a service that is easy to use and does not require any bioinformatics skills to visualize a network.

Many studies now produce parallel data sets from different omics technologies; however, the task of interpreting the acquired data in an integrated fashion is not trivial. This review covers those methods that have been used over the past decade to statistically integrate and interpret metabolomics and transcriptomic data sets. It defines four categories of approaches, correlation-based integration, concatenation-based integration, multivariate-based integration and pathway-based integration, into which all existing statistical methods fit. It also explores the choices in study design for generating samples for analysis by these omics technologies and the impact that these technical decisions have on the subsequent data analysis options.

MOTIVATION: The field of toxicogenomics (the application of '-omics' technologies to risk assessment of compound toxicities) has expanded in the last decade, partly driven by new legislation, aimed at reducing animal testing in chemical risk assessment but mainly as a result of a paradigm change in toxicology towards the use and integration of genome wide data. Many research groups worldwide have generated large amounts of such toxicogenomics data. However, there is no centralized repository for archiving and making these data and associated tools for their analysis easily available. RESULTS: The Data Infrastructure for Chemical Safety Assessment (diXa) is a robust and sustainable infrastructure storing toxicogenomics data. A central data warehouse is connected to a portal with links to chemical information and molecular and phenotype data. diXa is publicly available through a user-friendly web interface. New data can be readily deposited into diXa using guidelines and templates available online. Analysis descriptions and tools for interrogating the data are available via the diXa portal. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://www.dixa-fp7.eu CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

MOTIVATION: Comparing time courses of gene expression with time courses of phenotypic data may provide new insights in cellular mechanisms. In this study, we compared the performance of five pattern recognition methods with respect to their ability to relate genes and phenotypic data: one classical method (k-means) and four methods especially developed for time series [Short Time-series Expression Miner (STEM), Linear Mixed Model mixtures, Dynamic Time Warping for -Omics and linear modeling with R/Bioconductor limma package]. The methods were evaluated using data available from toxicological studies that had the aim to relate gene expression with phenotypic endpoints (i.e. to develop biomarkers for adverse outcomes). Additionally, technical aspects (influence of noise, number of time points and number of replicates) were evaluated on simulated data. RESULTS: None of the methods outperforms the others in terms of biology. Linear modeling with limma is mostly influenced by noise. STEM is mostly influenced by the number of biological replicates in the dataset, whereas k-means and linear modeling with limma are mostly influenced by the number of time points. In most cases, the results of the methods complement each other. We therefore provide recommendations to integrate the five methods. AVAILABILITY: The Matlab code for the simulations performed in this research is available in the Supplementary Data (Word file). The microarray data analysed in this paper are available at ArrayExpress (E-TOXM-22 and E-TOXM-23) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE39291). The phenotypic data are available in the Supplementary Data (Excel file). Links to the pattern recognition tools compared in this paper are provided in the main text. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.