Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ananth Balashankar
dblp:141/2020
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
7as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5011-8168ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 7 first-author · 8 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 30% Language models and text generation · 20% Reinforcement learning · 19% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Recommender systems · 90% Web and social media mining · 10% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 24, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | InfAlign: Inference-aware language model alignment · ICML 2025 Reuse Your Rewards: Reward Model Transfer for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Alignment · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | InfAlign: Inference-aware language model alignment · ICML 2025 Reuse Your Rewards: Reward Model Transfer for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Alignment · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.3 | 3 | 2023 | Effective Robustness against Natural Distribution Shifts for Models with Different Training Data · NeurIPS 2023 Can We Improve Model Robustness through Secondary Attribute Counterfactuals? · EMNLP (1) 2021 Enhancing Neural Recommender Models through Domain-Specific Concordance · WSDM 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
bias-term fine-tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | BEFT: Bias-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Models in Low-Data Regimes · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | BEFT: Bias-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Models in Low-Data Regimes · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | BEFT: Bias-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Models in Low-Data Regimes · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward transformation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | InfAlign: Inference-aware language model alignment · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation matching › feature alignment › embedding alignment
cross-lingual alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Reuse Your Rewards: Reward Model Transfer for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Alignment · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Effective Robustness against Natural Distribution Shifts for Models with Different Training Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
counterfactual data augmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Can We Improve Model Robustness through Secondary Attribute Counterfactuals? · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Can We Improve Model Robustness through Secondary Attribute Counterfactuals? · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
spurious correlation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Can We Improve Model Robustness through Secondary Attribute Counterfactuals? · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Recommender systems
domain-specific recommendation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Enhancing Neural Recommender Models through Domain-Specific Concordance · WSDM 2021 |
Recommender systems
trustworthy recommendation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Enhancing Neural Recommender Models through Domain-Specific Concordance · WSDM 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › causal machine learning
causal factor discovery |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Identifying Predictive Causal Factors from News Streams · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy analysis › privacy models
contextual integrity |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | VACCINE: Using Contextual Integrity For Data Leakage Detection · WWW 2019 |
Privacy and data protection › information leakage
data leakage detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | VACCINE: Using Contextual Integrity For Data Leakage Detection · WWW 2019 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy policy
privacy policy enforcement |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | VACCINE: Using Contextual Integrity For Data Leakage Detection · WWW 2019 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Effective Robustness against Natural Distribution Shifts for Models with Different Training Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot models |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Effective Robustness against Natural Distribution Shifts for Models with Different Training Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
abusive language detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Can We Improve Model Robustness through Secondary Attribute Counterfactuals? · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
coreference resolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Can We Improve Model Robustness through Secondary Attribute Counterfactuals? · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bias-term fine-tuning · 1.0controlled decoding · 0.9best-of-n sampling · 0.9KL-regularized reward maximization · 0.9supervised fine-tuning · 0.8reward modeling · 0.8effective robustness metric · 0.7reweighting · 0.5regularization · 0.5graph representation learning · 0.5counterfactual evaluation · 0.5counterfactual data augmentation · 0.5temporal reasoning · 0.4causal inference · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | BEFT: Bias-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Models in Low-Data RegimesabstractFine-tuning the bias terms of large language models (LLMs) has the potential to achieve unprecedented parameter efficiency while maintaining competitive performance, particularly in low-data regimes.However, the link between fine-tuning different bias terms (i.e., b q , b k , and b v in the query, key, or value projections) and downstream performance remains largely unclear to date.In this paper, we investigate the link between fine-tuning b q , b k , and b v with the performance of the downstream task.Our key finding is that directly fine-tuning b v generally leads to higher downstream performance in low-data regimes, in comparison to b q and b k .We extensively evaluate this unique property across a wide range of LLMs spanning encoder-only and decoderonly architectures up to 6.7B parameters (including bias-free LLMs).Our results provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of directly fine-tuning b v across various downstream tasks. Baichuan Huang, Ananth Balashankar, Amir Aminifar |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | InfAlign: Inference-aware language model alignmentabstractLanguage model alignment is a critical step
in training modern generative language models.
Alignment targets to improve win rate of a sample
from the aligned model against the base model.
Today, we are increasingly using inference-time
algorithms (e.g., Best-of-$N$ , controlled decoding, tree search) to decode from language models
rather than standard sampling. We show that this
train/test mismatch makes standard RLHF framework sub-optimal in view of such inference-time
methods. To this end, we propose a framework for
inference-aware alignment (InfAlign), which
aims to optimize *inference-time win rate* of the
aligned policy against the base model. We prove
that for any inference-time decoding procedure,
the optimal aligned policy is the solution to the
standard RLHF problem with a *transformation*
of the reward. This motivates us to provide the
calibrate-and-transform RL (InfAlign-CTRL)
algorithm to solve this problem, which involves
a reward calibration step and a KL-regularized
reward maximization step with a transformation
of the calibrated reward. For best-of-$N$ sampling
and best-of-$N$ jailbreaking, we propose specific
transformations offering up to 3-8% improvement
on inference-time win rates. Finally, we also show
that our proposed reward calibration method is a
strong baseline for optimizing standard win rate. Ananth Balashankar, Ziteng Sun, Jonathan Berant, Jacob Eisenstein, Michael Collins 0001, Adrian Hutter, Jong Lee, Chirag Nagpal, Flavien Prost, Aradhana Sinha, Ananda Theertha Suresh, Ahmad Beirami |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Reuse Your Rewards: Reward Model Transfer for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual AlignmentabstractAligning language models (LMs) based on human-annotated preference data is a crucial step in obtaining practical and performant LMbased systems.However, multilingual human preference data are difficult to obtain at scale, making it challenging to extend this framework to diverse languages.In this work, we evaluate a simple approach for zero-shot crosslingual alignment, where a reward model is trained on preference data in one source language and directly applied to other target languages.On summarization and open-ended dialog generation, we show that this method is consistently successful under comprehensive evaluation settings, including human evaluation: cross-lingually aligned models are preferred by humans over unaligned models on up to >70% of evaluation instances.We moreover find that a different-language reward model sometimes yields better aligned models than a same-language reward model.We also identify best practices when there is no languagespecific data for even supervised finetuning, another component in alignment.en de en es en ru en tr en vi de en es en ru en tr en vi en 0 20 40 60 ROUGE-L (a) Summarization, unaligned SFT model Target-Language SFT Data Zhaofeng Wu, Ananth Balashankar, Jacob Eisenstein, Ahmad Beirami |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2023 | Effective Robustness against Natural Distribution Shifts for Models with Different Training Dataabstract``Effective robustness'' measures the extra out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness beyond what can be predicted from the in-distribution (ID) performance. Existing effective robustness evaluations typically use a single test set such as ImageNet to evaluate the ID accuracy. This becomes problematic when evaluating models trained on different data distributions, e.g., comparing models trained on ImageNet vs. zero-shot language-image pre-trained models trained on LAION. In this paper, we propose a new evaluation metric to evaluate and compare the effective robustness of models trained on different data. To do this, we control for the accuracy on multiple ID test sets that cover the training distributions for all the evaluated models. Our new evaluation metric provides a better estimate of effective robustness when there are models with different training data. It may also explain the surprising effective robustness gains of zero-shot CLIP-like models exhibited in prior works that used ImageNet as the only ID test set, while the gains diminish under our new evaluation. Additional artifacts including interactive visualizations are provided at https://shizhouxing.github.io/effective-robustness. Zhouxing Shi, Nicholas Carlini, Ananth Balashankar, Ludwig Schmidt, Cho-Jui Hsieh, Alex Beutel, Yao Qin 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2022 | Targeted Policy Recommendations using Outcome-aware ClusteringabstractPolicy recommendations using observational data typically rely on estimating an econometric model on a sample of observations drawn from an entire population. However, different policy actions could potentially be optimal for different subgroups of a population. In this paper, we propose outcome-aware clustering, a new methodology to segment a population into different clusters and derive cluster-level policy recommendations. Outcome-aware clustering differs from conventional clustering algorithms across two basic dimensions. First, given a specific outcome of interest, outcome-aware clustering segments the population based on selecting a small set of features that closely relate with the outcome variable. Second, the clustering algorithm aims to generate near-homogeneous clusters based on a combination of cluster size-balancing constraints, inter and intra-cluster distances in the reduced feature space. We generate targeted policy recommendations for each outcome-aware cluster based on a standard multivariate regression of a condensed set of actionable policy features (which may partially overlap or differ from the features used for segmentation) from the observational data. We implement our outcome-aware clustering method on the Living Standards Measurement Study - Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (LSMS-ISA) dataset to generate targeted policy recommendations for improving farmers outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa. Based on a detailed analysis of the LSMS-ISA, we derive outcome-aware clusters of farmer populations across three sub-Saharan African countries and show that the targeted policy recommendations at the cluster level significantly differ from policies that are generated at the population level. Ananth Balashankar, Samuel P. Fraiberger, Eric Deregt, Marelize Gorgens, Lakshminarayanan Subramanian |
COMPASS | 1 |
| 2021 | Learning Faithful Representations of Causal GraphsabstractAnanth Balashankar, Lakshminarayanan Subramanian. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Ananth Balashankar, Lakshminarayanan Subramanian |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | Can We Improve Model Robustness through Secondary Attribute Counterfactuals?abstractDeveloping robust NLP models that perform well on many, even small, slices of data is a significant but important challenge, with implications from fairness to general reliability.To this end, recent research has explored how models rely on spurious correlations, and how counterfactual data augmentation (CDA) can mitigate such issues.In this paper we study how and why modeling counterfactuals over multiple attributes can go significantly further in improving model performance.We propose RDI, a context-aware methodology which takes into account the impact of secondary attributes on the model's predictions and increases sensitivity for secondary attributes over reweighted counterfactually augmented data.By implementing RDI in the context of toxicity detection, we find that accounting for secondary attributes can significantly improve robustness, with improvements in sliced accuracy on the original dataset up to 7% compared to existing robustness methods.We also demonstrate that RDI generalizes to the coreference resolution task and provide guidelines to extend this to other tasks. Ananth Balashankar, Xuezhi Wang 0002, Ben Packer, Nithum Thain, Ed H. Chi, Alex Beutel |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | Enhancing Neural Recommender Models through Domain-Specific ConcordanceabstractRecommender models trained on historical observational data alone can be brittle when domain experts subject them to counterfactual evaluation. In many domains, experts can articulate common, high-level mappings or rules between categories of inputs (user's history) and categories of outputs (preferred recommendations). One challenge is to determine how to train recommender models to adhere to these rules. In this work, we introduce the goal of domain-specific concordance: the expectation that a recommender model follow a set of expert-defined categorical rules. We propose a regularization-based approach that optimizes for robustness on rule-based input perturbations. To test the effectiveness of this method, we apply it in a medication recommender model over diagnosis-medicine categories, and in movie and music recommender models, on rules over categories based on movie tags and song genres. We demonstrate that we can increase the category-based robustness distance by up to 126% without degrading accuracy, but rather increasing it by up to 12% compared to baseline models in the popular MIMIC-III, MovieLens-20M and Last.fm Million Song datasets. Ananth Balashankar, Alex Beutel, Lakshminarayanan Subramanian |
WSDM | 1 |
| 2019 | Reconstructing the MERS disease outbreak from newsabstractDisease surveillance is critical for mobilizing health care resources and deciding on isolation measures to contain the spread of infectious diseases. Because ground truth signals of rare and deadly diseases are sparse, it can be useful to enrich surveillance systems using measures of social and environmental factors which are known to influence the spread of a disease. One approach to measure such factors is by using real time news streams. In this study, we model the epidemiological transmission of the Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) disease during the outbreak that occurred from 2013 to 2018 in the Arabian peninsula. Using the GDELT news event database, we show that conflict related signals allow us to reconstruct the time series of newly infected cases per week. This reduces the residual sum of squared errors by a factor of 3.36 as compared to a standard epidemiological model. We also capture interpretable time-sensitive factors which illustrate the importance of using real time news stream to model the evolution of a disease such as MERS and facilitate early and effective policy interventions. Ananth Balashankar, Aashish Dugar, Lakshminarayanan Subramanian, Samuel P. Fraiberger |
COMPASS | 1 |
| 2019 | Identifying Predictive Causal Factors from News StreamsabstractAnanth Balashankar, Sunandan Chakraborty, Samuel Fraiberger, Lakshminarayanan Subramanian. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Ananth Balashankar, Sunandan Chakraborty, Samuel P. Fraiberger, Lakshminarayanan Subramanian |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | VACCINE: Using Contextual Integrity For Data Leakage DetectionabstractModern enterprises rely on Data Leakage Prevention (DLP) systems to enforce privacy policies that prevent unintentional flow of sensitive information to unauthorized entities. However, these systems operate based on rule sets that are limited to syntactic analysis and therefore completely ignore the semantic relationships between participants involved in the information exchanges. For similar reasons, these systems cannot enforce complex privacy policies that require temporal reasoning about events that have previously occurred. Yan Shvartzshnaider, Zvonimir Pavlinovic, Ananth Balashankar, Thomas Wies, Lakshminarayanan Subramanian, Helen Nissenbaum, Prateek Mittal |
WWW | 3 |