Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Ramakrishna Tipireddy

dblp:141/4763 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2196-2164ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 67% High-performance computing · 33%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction
0.712023
Extending Conformal Prediction to Hidden Markov Models with Exact Validity via de Finetti's Theorem for Markov Chains · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.712023
Extending Conformal Prediction to Hidden Markov Models with Exact Validity via de Finetti's Theorem for Markov Chains · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
hidden markov model
0.712023
Extending Conformal Prediction to Hidden Markov Models with Exact Validity via de Finetti's Theorem for Markov Chains · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.712023
Extending Conformal Prediction to Hidden Markov Models with Exact Validity via de Finetti's Theorem for Markov Chains · ICML 2023
Program analysis › numerical program analysis
floating-point error analysis
0.412020
FPDetect: Efficient Reasoning About Stencil Programs Using Selective Direct Evaluation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2020
Program analysis
static analysis
0.412020
FPDetect: Efficient Reasoning About Stencil Programs Using Selective Direct Evaluation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2020
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
error detection
0.412020
FPDetect: Efficient Reasoning About Stencil Programs Using Selective Direct Evaluation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2020
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors
0.412020
FPDetect: Efficient Reasoning About Stencil Programs Using Selective Direct Evaluation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2020
High-performance computing
stencil computation
0.412020
FPDetect: Efficient Reasoning About Stencil Programs Using Selective Direct Evaluation · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

selective direct evaluation · 0.9offline analysis · 0.9exchangeable block partitioning · 0.7de finetti's theorem for markov chains · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Extending Conformal Prediction to Hidden Markov Models with Exact Validity via de Finetti's Theorem for Markov Chains
abstract
Conformal prediction is a widely used method to quantify the uncertainty of a classifier under the assumption of exchangeability (e.g., IID data). We generalize conformal prediction to the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) framework where the assumption of exchangeability is not valid. The key idea of the proposed method is to partition the non-exchangeable Markovian data from the HMM into exchangeable blocks by exploiting the de Finetti’s Theorem for Markov Chains discovered by Diaconis and Freedman (1980). The permutations of the exchangeable blocks are viewed as randomizations of the observed Markovian data from the HMM. The proposed method provably retains all desirable theoretical guarantees offered by the classical conformal prediction framework in both exchangeable and Markovian settings. In particular, while the lack of exchangeability introduced by Markovian samples constitutes a violation of a crucial assumption for classical conformal prediction, the proposed method views it as an advantage that can be exploited to improve the performance further. Detailed numerical and empirical results that complement the theoretical conclusions are provided to illustrate the practical feasibility of the proposed method.
Buddhika Nettasinghe, Samrat Chatterjee, Ramakrishna Tipireddy, Mahantesh Halappanavar
ICML3
2023 Accelerating Scientific Simulations with Bi-Fidelity Weighted Transfer Learning
abstract
High-fidelity modeling is an essential design tool for many engineering applications. However, for complex systems, computational cost can be a limiting factor. Analyzing parameter sensitivity, uncertainty quantification, and design optimization require many model evaluations. Surrogate models are often used to develop the relationship between model parameters and quantities of interest. However, in the case of complex systems, surrogate models require several degrees of freedom and, thus, a large number of data points to determine the correct dependencies. For many applications, this may be prohibitively expensive. The reduction of computational requirements can be achieved by leveraging low-fidelity models. Low-fidelity models represent the system at a coarser resolution with the advantage of computational efficiency. Therefore, a bi-fidelity modeling paradigm, which augments the accuracy of a low-fidelity model in a computationally efficient manner by invoking limited runs of a high-fidelity model, can be leveraged to sufficiently balance the accuracy and computational requirements. In this work, a bi-fidelity weighted transfer learning method using neural networks was applied to a computational fluid dynamics heat transfer modeling problem. The transfer learning advantage was investigated as a function of hyperparameters. Our main finding is that the use of a bi-fidelity modeling paradigm achieves accuracy close to that of a high-fidelity Gaussian process model while significantly reducing computational cost. The bi-fidelity model achieves comparable performance with 90 high-fidelity samples-that is, 60% less than the samples needed to achieve similar accuracy without the use of bi-fidelity modeling,
Katarzyna Borowiec, Dan Lu 0001, Vikas Chandan, Samrat Chatterjee, Pradeep Ramuhalli, Ramakrishna Tipireddy, Mahantesh Halappanavar, Frank Liu 0001
ICMLA6
2020 FPDetect: Efficient Reasoning About Stencil Programs Using Selective Direct Evaluation
abstract
We present FPD etect , a low-overhead approach for detecting logical errors and soft errors affecting stencil computations without generating false positives. We develop an offline analysis that tightly estimates the number of floating-point bits preserved across stencil applications. This estimate rigorously bounds the values expected in the data space of the computation. Violations of this bound can be attributed with certainty to errors. FPD etect helps synthesize error detectors customized for user-specified levels of accuracy and coverage. FPD etect also enables overhead reduction techniques based on deploying these detectors coarsely in space and time. Experimental evaluations demonstrate the practicality of our approach.
Sriram Krishnamoorthy, Ian Briggs, Ganesh Gopalakrishnan, Ramakrishna Tipireddy
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim.5
2018 Quantification, Trade-off Analysis, and Optimal Checkpoint Placement for Reliability and Availability
abstract
Checkpointing is the most widely used technique in high-performance computing (HPC) to ensure the application progress in the presence of failures. In this paper, we present mathematical models of checkpointing systems to quantify their reliability and availability. We perform trade-off analysis with respect to resource costs and reliability. Then, we explore the optimal checkpoint placement for checkpointing systems to maximize system availability. Finally, in a rigorous manner, we comparatively analyze the behavior of redundant systems where replication and repair mechanisms are employed. We postulate that the proposed models can aid system designers, who can instantiate our models to assess and quantify the availability and reliability of systems of interest.
Omer Subasi, Ramakrishna Tipireddy, Sriram Krishnamoorthy
HiPC2