Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul A. Kitts

dblp:141/5041 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological database
sequence database quality
0.312018
VecScreen_plus_taxonomy: imposing a tax(onomy) increase on vector contamination screening · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing read preprocessing
vector contamination detection
0.312018
VecScreen_plus_taxonomy: imposing a tax(onomy) increase on vector contamination screening · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological database
sequence database curation
0.112018
VecScreen_plus_taxonomy: imposing a tax(onomy) increase on vector contamination screening · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

taxonomy annotation · 0.3sequence alignment · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 VecScreen_plus_taxonomy: imposing a tax(onomy) increase on vector contamination screening
abstract
Motivation: Nucleic acid sequences in public databases should not contain vector contamination, but many sequences in GenBank do (or did) contain vectors. The National Center for Biotechnology Information uses the program VecScreen to screen submitted sequences for contamination. Additional tools are needed to distinguish true-positive (contamination) from false-positive (not contamination) VecScreen matches. Results: A principal reason for false-positive VecScreen matches is that the sequence and the matching vector subsequence originate from closely related or identical organisms (for example, both originate in Escherichia coli). We collected information on the taxonomy of sources of vector segments in the UniVec database used by VecScreen. We used that information in two overlapping software pipelines for retrospective analysis of contamination in GenBank and for prospective analysis of contamination in new sequence submissions. Using the retrospective pipeline, we identified and corrected over 8000 contaminated sequences in the nonredundant nucleotide database. The prospective analysis pipeline has been in production use since April 2017 to evaluate some new GenBank submissions. Availability and implementation: Data on the sources of UniVec entries were included in release 10.0 (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/pub/UniVec/). The main software is freely available at https://github.com/aaschaffer/vecscreen_plus_taxonomy. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Alejandro A. Schäffer, Eric P. Nawrocki, Yoon Choi, Paul A. Kitts, Ilene Karsch-Mizrachi, Richard McVeigh
Bioinform.4