Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xinhua Peng
dblp:141/7631
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 67% Requirements engineering and software design · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 82% Computational finance and economics · 18% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › software size measurement
function point analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning to extract transaction function from requirements: an industrial case on financial software · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2020 |
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning to extract transaction function from requirements: an industrial case on financial software · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2020 |
Empirical software engineering › software estimation
software size estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning to extract transaction function from requirements: an industrial case on financial software · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
natural language processing · 0.9machine learning · 0.9spin-exchange collisions · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | A multi-branch Mamba-Transformer framework for hyperspectral soil property estimation
Wenchao Qi, Weichao Sun, Xinhua Peng |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 9 |
| 2022 | Review of noble-gas spin amplification via the spin-exchange collisions
Haowen Su, Min Jiang 0005, Xinhua Peng |
Sci. China Inf. Sci. | 3 |
| 2022 | Automated data function extraction from textual requirements by leveraging semi-supervised CRF and language model
Mingyang Li 0005, Lin Shi 0006, Junjie Wang 0001, Qing Wang 0001, Jun Hu 0015, Xinhua Peng, Weimin Liao, Guizhen Pi |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 7 |
| 2020 | Automated Extraction of Requirement Entities by Leveraging LSTM-CRF and Transfer LearningabstractRequirement entities, "explicit specification of concepts that define the primary function objects", play an important role in requirement analysis for software development and maintenance. It is a labor-intensive activity to extract requirement entities from textual requirements, which is typically done manually. A few existing studies propose automated methods to support key requirement concept extraction. However, they face two main challenges: lack of domain-specific natural language processing techniques and expensive labeling effort. To address the challenges, this study presents a novel approach named RENE, which employs LSTM-CRF model for requirement entity extraction and introduces the general knowledge to reduce the demands for labeled data. It consists of four phases: 1) Model construction, where RENE builds LSTM-CRF model and an isomorphic LSTM language model for transfer learning; 2) LSTM language model training, where RENE captures general knowledge and adapt to requirement context; 3) LSTM-CRF training, where RENE trains the LSTM-CRF model with the transferred layers; 4) Requirement entity extraction, where RENE applies the trained LSTM-CRF model to a new-coming requirement, and automatically extracts its requirement entities. RENE is evaluated using two methods: evaluation on historical dataset and user study. The evaluation on the historical dataset shows that RENE could achieve 79% precision, 81% recall, and 80% F1. The evaluation results from the user study also suggest that RENE could produce more accurate and comprehensive requirement entities, compared with those produced by engineers. Mingyang Li 0005, Lin Shi 0006, Qing Wang 0001, Jun Hu 0015, Xinhua Peng, Weimin Liao, Guizhen Pi |
ICSME | 6 |
| 2020 | Learning to extract transaction function from requirements: an industrial case on financial softwareabstractIn practice, it is very important to determine the size of a proposed software system yet to be built based on its requirements, i.e., early in the development life cycle. The most widely used approach for size estimation is Function Point Analysis (FPA). However, since FPA involves human judgment, the estimation results are some degree of subjective, and the process is labor and cost intensive. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to identify transaction functions from textual requirements automatically by leveraging a set of natural language processing techniques and machine learning models. We evaluate our approach on 1,864 requirements and 104,691 transaction functions taken from 36 financial projects from one banking industry. The results show that the contents of the suggested transaction functions by our approach are high in quality, with low perplexity value of 8.5 and high BLEU score of 34 on average. The types of suggested transaction functions can also be accurately classified, with overall accuracy of 0.99 on average. Our approach can provide reasonable suggestions that assist industrial practitioners to identify transaction functions faster and easier. Lin Shi 0006, Mingyang Li 0005, Mingzhe Xing, Qing Wang 0001, Xinhua Peng, Weimin Liao, Guizhen Pi |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 6 |