Tatiana Silva de Alencar

dblp:141/9589 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6693-3282ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Designing Urban IoT Systems: A Co-design Framework for Smart Cities
Tatiana Silva de Alencar, Luciana A. M. Zaina
INTERACT (4)1
2025 HCI Research with GenAI: A Guide for Students and Researchers Improving Their Academic Work
Gessé Evangelista, Joelma Choma, Leonardo Ciscon, Maylon Pires Macedo, Suéllen Martinelli, Tatiana Silva de Alencar, Luciana A. M. Zaina
INTERACT (4)6
2021 Addressing Brazilian diversity in personal computing systems with a tailoring-based approach
Vânia Paula de Almeida Néris, Frederico José Fortuna, Rodrigo Bonacin, Tatiana Silva de Alencar, Luciano de Oliveira Neris, Maria Cecília Calani Baranauskas
Pers. Ubiquitous Comput.4
2016 Emotional Response Evaluation of Users in Ubiquitous Environments: an Observational Case Study
abstract
Ubiquitous systems can be characterized as providing transparency, while being context-sensitive and dynamically interactive. Evaluating ubiquitous environments involves challenges ranging from multidisciplinary areas to environmental simulations. However, few studies have been carried out on the user's feelings and moods in these environments, i.e. within mental contexts. This paper undertakes an observational case study which involves evaluating emotional responses in ubiquitous environments. A number of volunteers were exposed to stimuli with the aim of changing their mood through colors and images, in accordance with their initial emotional state. Emotional responses were evaluated by means of a hybrid approach that entailed employing different evaluation instruments at different periods of the interaction and which took account of different stakeholders. The results suggest that the approach is appropriate, although some adjustments are required for the evaluation instruments, as well for the interaction time with the environment so that it is possible to collect further data about the user's experience.
Tatiana Silva de Alencar, Kamila R. H. Rodrigues, Marcelo Barbosa, Renata Germano Bianchi, Vânia Paula de Almeida Néris
ACE1