Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rebecca W. Doerge
dblp:142/5467
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Robust adjustment of sequence tag abundance · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
RNA-seq analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Robust adjustment of sequence tag abundance · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.1 | 2 | 2014 | Robust adjustment of sequence tag abundance · Bioinform. 2014 Calculation of the minimum number of replicate spots required for detection of significant gene expression fold change in microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Calculation of the minimum number of replicate spots required for detection of significant gene expression fold change in microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray experimental design |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Calculation of the minimum number of replicate spots required for detection of significant gene expression fold change in microarray experiments · Bioinform. 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical modeling · 0.2statistical power analysis · 0.0sampling variability estimation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Robust adjustment of sequence tag abundanceabstractMOTIVATION: The majority of next-generation sequencing technologies effectively sample small amounts of DNA or RNA that are amplified (i.e. copied) before sequencing. The amplification process is not perfect, leading to extreme bias in sequenced read counts. We present a novel procedure to account for amplification bias and demonstrate its effectiveness in mitigating gene length dependence when estimating true gene expression. RESULTS: We tested the proposed method on simulated and real data. Simulations indicated that our method captures true gene expression more effectively than classic censoring-based approaches and leads to power gains in differential expression testing, particularly for shorter genes with high transcription rates. We applied our method to an unreplicated Arabidopsis RNA-seq dataset resulting in disparate gene ontologies arising from gene set enrichment analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R code to perform the RASTA procedures is freely available on the web at www.stat.purdue.edu/∼doerge/. Douglas D. Baumann, Rebecca W. Doerge |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2010 | A semi-nonparametric mixture model for selecting functionally consistent proteins
Lianbo Yu, Rebecca W. Doerge |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2006 | Identification of QTLs controlling gene expression networks defined a prioriabstractBACKGROUND: Gene expression microarrays allow the quantification of transcript accumulation for many or all genes in a genome. This technology has been utilized for a range of investigations, from assessments of gene regulation in response to genetic or environmental fluctuation to global expression QTL (eQTL) analyses of natural variation. Current analysis techniques facilitate the statistical querying of individual genes to evaluate the significance of a change in response, also known as differential expression. Since genes are also known to respond as groups due to their membership in networks, effective approaches are needed to investigate transcriptome variation as related to gene network responses. RESULTS: We describe a statistical approach that is capable of assessing higher-order a priori defined gene network response, as measured by microarrays. This analysis detected significant network variation between two Arabidopsis thaliana accessions, Bay-0 and Shahdara. By extending this approach, we were able to identify eQTLs controlling network responses for 18 out of 20 a priori-defined gene networks in a recombinant inbred line population derived from accessions Bay-0 and Shahdara. CONCLUSION: This approach has the potential to be expanded to facilitate direct tests of the relationship between phenotypic trait and transcript genetic architecture. The use of a priori definitions for network eQTL identification has enormous potential for providing direction toward future eQTL analyses. Daniel J. Kliebenstein, Marilyn A. L. West, Hans van Leeuwen, Olivier Loudet, Rebecca W. Doerge, Dina A. St Clair |
BMC Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2005 | Combining Affymetrix microarray resultsabstractBACKGROUND: As the use of microarray technology becomes more prevalent it is not unusual to find several laboratories employing the same microarray technology to identify genes related to the same condition in the same species. Although the experimental specifics are similar, typically a different list of statistically significant genes result from each data analysis. RESULTS: We propose a statistically-based meta-analytic approach to microarray analysis for the purpose of systematically combining results from the different laboratories. This approach provides a more precise view of genes that are significantly related to the condition of interest while simultaneously allowing for differences between laboratories. Of particular interest is the widely used Affymetrix oligonucleotide array, the results of which are naturally suited to a meta-analysis. A simulation model based on the Affymetrix platform is developed to examine the adaptive nature of the meta-analytic approach and to illustrate the usefulness of such an approach in combining microarray results across laboratories. The approach is then applied to real data involving a mouse model for multiple sclerosis. CONCLUSION: The quantitative estimates from the meta-analysis model tend to be closer to the "true" degree of differential expression than any single lab. Meta-analytic methods can systematically combine Affymetrix results from different laboratories to gain a clearer understanding of genes' relationships to specific conditions of interest. John R. Stevens, Rebecca W. Doerge |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2002 | Calculation of the minimum number of replicate spots required for detection of significant gene expression fold change in microarray experimentsabstractAbstract Motivation: We present statistical methods for determining the number of per gene replicate spots required in microarray experiments. The purpose of these methods is to obtain an estimate of the sampling variability present in microarray data, and to determine the number of replicate spots required to achieve a high probability of detecting a significant fold change in gene expression, while maintaining a low error rate. Our approach is based on data from control microarrays, and involves the use of standard statistical estimation techniques. Results: After analyzing two experimental data sets containing control array data, we were able to determine the statistical power available for the detection of significant differential expression given differing levels of replication. The inclusion of replicate spots on microarrays not only allows more accurate estimation of the variability present in an experiment, but more importantly increases the probability of detecting genes undergoing significant fold changes in expression, while substantially decreasing the probability of observing fold changes due to chance rather than true differential expression. Availability: The methods presented here are based on standard techniques, and are available in most statistical software packages. We used the software R to perform the computations for this work. Contact: [email protected]; [email protected] * To whom correspondence should be addressed at Department of Statistics, 1399 Mathematical Sciences Building, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1399, USA. Mik Black, Rebecca W. Doerge |
Bioinform. | 2 |