VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oren Elisha
dblp:142/8704
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 59% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13% Trustworthy machine learning · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 50% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 50% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › knowledge editing
knowledge injection into language models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMs · EMNLP 2024 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMs · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › trustworthy language model
privacy-preserving inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Low Latency Privacy Preserving Inference · ICML 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
homomorphic encryption |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Low Latency Privacy Preserving Inference · ICML 2019 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure inference
secure neural network inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Low Latency Privacy Preserving Inference · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Wavelet decompositions of Random Forests - smoothness analysis, sparse approximation and applications · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMs · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
ensemble compression |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Wavelet decompositions of Random Forests - smoothness analysis, sparse approximation and applications · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unsupervised fine-tuning · 1.5retrieval-augmented generation · 1.5transfer learning · 0.8homomorphic encryption · 0.8wavelet analysis · 0.2sparse approximation · 0.2random forest · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Fine-Tuning or Retrieval? Comparing Knowledge Injection in LLMsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) encapsulate a vast amount of factual information within their pre-trained weights, as evidenced by their ability to answer diverse questions across different domains.However, this knowledge is inherently limited, relying heavily on the characteristics of the training data.Consequently, using external datasets to incorporate new information or refine the capabilities of LLMs on previously seen information poses a significant challenge.In this study, we compare two common approaches: unsupervised fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG).We evaluate both approaches on a variety of knowledge-intensive tasks across different topics.Our findings reveal that while unsupervised fine-tuning offers some improvement, RAG consistently outperforms it, both for existing knowledge encountered during training and entirely new knowledge.Moreover, we find that LLMs struggle to learn new factual information through unsupervised fine-tuning, and that exposing them to numerous variations of the same fact during training could alleviate this problem. Oded Ovadia, Menachem Brief, Moshik Mishaeli, Oren Elisha |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2019 | Low Latency Privacy Preserving InferenceabstractWhen applying machine learning to sensitive data, one has to find a balance between accuracy, information security, and computational-complexity. Recent studies combined Homomorphic Encryption with neural networks to make inferences while protecting against information leakage. However, these methods are limited by the width and depth of neural networks that can be used (and hence the accuracy) and exhibit high latency even for relatively simple networks. In this study we provide two solutions that address these limitations. In the first solution, we present more than 10\times improvement in latency and enable inference on wider networks compared to prior attempts with the same level of security. The improved performance is achieved by novel methods to represent the data during the computation. In the second solution, we apply the method of transfer learning to provide private inference services using deep networks with latency of \sim0.16 seconds. We demonstrate the efficacy of our methods on several computer vision tasks. Alon Brutzkus, Ran Gilad-Bachrach, Oren Elisha |
ICML | 3 |
| 2016 | Wavelet decompositions of Random Forests - smoothness analysis, sparse approximation and applicationsabstractIn this paper we introduce, in the setting of machine learning, a generalization of wavelet analysis which is a popular approach to low dimensional structured signal analysis. The wavelet decomposition of a Random Forest provides a sparse approximation of any regression or classification high dimensional function at various levels of detail, with a concrete ordering of the Random Forest nodes: from `significant' elements to nodes capturing only `insignificant' noise. Motivated by function space theory, we use the wavelet decomposition to compute numerically a `weak- type' smoothness index that captures the complexity of the underlying function. As we show through extensive experimentation, this sparse representation facilitates a variety of applications such as improved regression for difficult datasets, a novel approach to feature importance, resilience to noisy or irrelevant features, compression of ensembles, etc. Oren Elisha, Shai Dekel |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |