Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bernhard Steiert

dblp:143/8757 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-1398-1624ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 92% Medical and health informatics · 8%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
dynamical system modeling
0.522016
L1 regularization facilitates detection of cell type-specific parameters in dynamical systems · Bioinform. 2016
Data2Dynamics: a modeling environment tailored to parameter estimation in dynamical systems · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology
parameter estimation
0.212015
Data2Dynamics: a modeling environment tailored to parameter estimation in dynamical systems · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
systems biology
0.212015
Data2Dynamics: a modeling environment tailored to parameter estimation in dynamical systems · Bioinform. 2015
Medical and health informatics
drug development
0.112016
L1 regularization facilitates detection of cell type-specific parameters in dynamical systems · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

profile likelihood · 0.2likelihood ratio test · 0.2l1 regularization · 0.2sensitivity analysis · 0.2parallel computing · 0.2frequentist inference · 0.2bayesian inference · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Likelihood-ratio test statistic for the finite-sample case in nonlinear ordinary differential equation models
abstract
Likelihood ratios are frequently utilized as basis for statistical tests, for model selection criteria and for assessing parameter and prediction uncertainties, e.g. using the profile likelihood. However, translating these likelihood ratios into p-values or confidence intervals requires the exact form of the test statistic's distribution. The lack of knowledge about this distribution for nonlinear ordinary differential equation (ODE) models requires an approximation which assumes the so-called asymptotic setting, i.e. a sufficiently large amount of data. Since the amount of data from quantitative molecular biology is typically limited in applications, this finite-sample case regularly occurs for mechanistic models of dynamical systems, e.g. biochemical reaction networks or infectious disease models. Thus, it is unclear whether the standard approach of using statistical thresholds derived for the asymptotic large-sample setting in realistic applications results in valid conclusions. In this study, empirical likelihood ratios for parameters from 19 published nonlinear ODE benchmark models are investigated using a resampling approach for the original data designs. Their distributions are compared to the asymptotic approximation and statistical thresholds are checked for conservativeness. It turns out, that corrections of the likelihood ratios in such finite-sample applications are required in order to avoid anti-conservative results.
Christian Tönsing, Bernhard Steiert, Jens Timmer, Clemens Kreutz
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2016 L1 regularization facilitates detection of cell type-specific parameters in dynamical systems
abstract
MOTIVATION: A major goal of drug development is to selectively target certain cell types. Cellular decisions influenced by drugs are often dependent on the dynamic processing of information. Selective responses can be achieved by differences between the involved cell types at levels of receptor, signaling, gene regulation or further downstream. Therefore, a systematic approach to detect and quantify cell type-specific parameters in dynamical systems becomes necessary. RESULTS: Here, we demonstrate that a combination of nonlinear modeling with L1 regularization is capable of detecting cell type-specific parameters. To adapt the least-squares numerical optimization routine to L1 regularization, sub-gradient strategies as well as truncation of proposed optimization steps were implemented. Likelihood-ratio tests were used to determine the optimal regularization strength resulting in a sparse solution in terms of a minimal number of cell type-specific parameters that is in agreement with the data. By applying our implementation to a realistic dynamical benchmark model of the DREAM6 challenge we were able to recover parameter differences with an accuracy of 78%. Within the subset of detected differences, 91% were in agreement with their true value. Furthermore, we found that the results could be improved using the profile likelihood. In conclusion, the approach constitutes a general method to infer an overarching model with a minimum number of individual parameters for the particular models. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A MATLAB implementation is provided within the freely available, open-source modeling environment Data2Dynamics. Source code for all examples is provided online at http://www.data2dynamics.org/ CONTACT: [email protected].
Bernhard Steiert, Jens Timmer, Clemens Kreutz
Bioinform.1
2016 Identification of Cell Type-Specific Differences in Erythropoietin Receptor Signaling in Primary Erythroid and Lung Cancer Cells
abstract
Lung cancer, with its most prevalent form non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and is commonly treated with chemotherapeutic drugs such as cisplatin. Lung cancer patients frequently suffer from chemotherapy-induced anemia, which can be treated with erythropoietin (EPO). However, studies have indicated that EPO not only promotes erythropoiesis in hematopoietic cells, but may also enhance survival of NSCLC cells. Here, we verified that the NSCLC cell line H838 expresses functional erythropoietin receptors (EPOR) and that treatment with EPO reduces cisplatin-induced apoptosis. To pinpoint differences in EPO-induced survival signaling in erythroid progenitor cells (CFU-E, colony forming unit-erythroid) and H838 cells, we combined mathematical modeling with a method for feature selection, the L1 regularization. Utilizing an example model and simulated data, we demonstrated that this approach enables the accurate identification and quantification of cell type-specific parameters. We applied our strategy to quantitative time-resolved data of EPO-induced JAK/STAT signaling generated by quantitative immunoblotting, mass spectrometry and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) in CFU-E and H838 cells as well as H838 cells overexpressing human EPOR (H838-HA-hEPOR). The established parsimonious mathematical model was able to simultaneously describe the data sets of CFU-E, H838 and H838-HA-hEPOR cells. Seven cell type-specific parameters were identified that included for example parameters for nuclear translocation of STAT5 and target gene induction. Cell type-specific differences in target gene induction were experimentally validated by qRT-PCR experiments. The systematic identification of pathway differences and sensitivities of EPOR signaling in CFU-E and H838 cells revealed potential targets for intervention to selectively inhibit EPO-induced signaling in the tumor cells but leave the responses in erythroid progenitor cells unaffected. Thus, the proposed modeling strategy can be employed as a general procedure to identify cell type-specific parameters and to recommend treatment strategies for the selective targeting of specific cell types.
Ruth Merkle, Bernhard Steiert, Florian Salopiata, Sofia Depner, Andreas Raue, Nao Iwamoto, Max Schelker, Helge Hass, Marvin Wäsch, Martin E. Böhm, Oliver Mücke, Daniel B. Lipka, Christoph Plass, Wolf D. Lehmann, Clemens Kreutz, Jens Timmer, Marcel Schilling, Ursula Klingmüller
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2015 Data2Dynamics: a modeling environment tailored to parameter estimation in dynamical systems
abstract
UNLABELLED: Modeling of dynamical systems using ordinary differential equations is a popular approach in the field of systems biology. Two of the most critical steps in this approach are to construct dynamical models of biochemical reaction networks for large datasets and complex experimental conditions and to perform efficient and reliable parameter estimation for model fitting. We present a modeling environment for MATLAB that pioneers these challenges. The numerically expensive parts of the calculations such as the solving of the differential equations and of the associated sensitivity system are parallelized and automatically compiled into efficient C code. A variety of parameter estimation algorithms as well as frequentist and Bayesian methods for uncertainty analysis have been implemented and used on a range of applications that lead to publications. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The Data2Dynamics modeling environment is MATLAB based, open source and freely available at http://www.data2dynamics.org. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Andreas Raue, Bernhard Steiert, Max Schelker, Clemens Kreutz, Tim Maiwald, Helge Hass, Joep Vanlier, Christian Tönsing, Lorenz Adlung, Raphael Engesser, Wolfgang Mader 0002, Tim Heinemann, Jan Hasenauer, Marcel Schilling, Thomas Höfer, Edda Klipp, Fabian J. Theis, Ursula Klingmüller, Birgit Schoeberl, Jens Timmer
Bioinform.2
2015 Summary of the DREAM8 Parameter Estimation Challenge: Toward Parameter Identification for Whole-Cell Models
abstract
Whole-cell models that explicitly represent all cellular components at the molecular level have the potential to predict phenotype from genotype. However, even for simple bacteria, whole-cell models will contain thousands of parameters, many of which are poorly characterized or unknown. New algorithms are needed to estimate these parameters and enable researchers to build increasingly comprehensive models. We organized the Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessments and Methods (DREAM) 8 Whole-Cell Parameter Estimation Challenge to develop new parameter estimation algorithms for whole-cell models. We asked participants to identify a subset of parameters of a whole-cell model given the model's structure and in silico "experimental" data. Here we describe the challenge, the best performing methods, and new insights into the identifiability of whole-cell models. We also describe several valuable lessons we learned toward improving future challenges. Going forward, we believe that collaborative efforts supported by inexpensive cloud computing have the potential to solve whole-cell model parameter estimation.
Jonathan R. Karr, Alex H. Williams, Jeremy Zucker, Andreas Raue, Bernhard Steiert, Jens Timmer, Clemens Kreutz, Simon Wilkinson, Brandon A. Allgood, Brian M. Bot, Bruce R. Hoff, Michael R. Kellen, Markus W. Covert, Gustavo Stolovitzky, Pablo Meyer 0001
PLoS Comput. Biol.5