Abstract We examine verification of concurrent programs under the total store ordering (TSO) semantics used by thex86architecture. In our model, threads manipulate variables over infinite domains and they can check whether variables are related for a range of relations. We show that, in general, the control state reachability problem is undecidable. This result is derived through a reduction from the state reachability problem of lossy channel systems with data (which is known to be undecidable). In the light of this undecidability, we turn our attention to a more tractable variant of the reachability problem. Specifically, we study context bounded runs, which provide an under-approximation of the program behavior by limiting the possible interactions between processes. A run consists of a number of contexts, with each context representing a sequence of steps where a only single designated thread is active. We prove that the control state reachability problem under bounded context switching is PSPACE complete.

We consider the classic problem of scheduling jobs with precedence constraints on a set of identical machines to minimize the weighted completion time objective. Understanding the exact approximability of the problem when job lengths are uniform is a well known open problem in scheduling theory. In this paper, we show an optimal algorithm that runs in polynomial time and achieves an approximation factor of (2 + ∊) for the weighted completion time objective when the number of machines is a constant. The result is obtained by building on the lift and project approach introduced in a breakthrough work by Levey and Rothvoss [15] for the makespan minimization problem.

We consider the problem of finding a low discrepancy coloring for sparse set systems where each element lies in at most $t$ sets. We give an efficient algorithm that finds a coloring with discrepancy $O((t \log n)^{1/2})$, matching the best known nonconstructive bound for the problem due to Banaszczyk. The previous algorithms only achieved an $O(t^{1/2} \log n)$ bound. The result also extends to the more general Komlós setting and gives an algorithmic $O(\log^{1/2} n)$ bound.

A central problem in scheduling is to schedule n unit size jobs with precedence constraints on m identical machines so as to minimize the makespan. For m=3, it is not even known if the problem is NP-hard and this is one of the last open problems from the book of Garey and Johnson. We show that for fixed m and epsilon, {polylog}(n) rounds of Sherali-Adams hierarchy applied to a natural LP of the problem provides a (1+epsilon)-approximation algorithm running in quasi-polynomial time. This improves over the recent result of Levey and Rothvoss, who used r=(log n)^{O(log log n)} rounds of Sherali-Adams in order to get a (1+epsilon)-approximation algorithm with a running time of n^O(r).

An important result in discrepancy due to Banaszczyk states that for any set of n vectors in ℝm of ℓ2 norm at most 1 and any convex body K in ℝm of Gaussian measure at least half, there exists a ± 1 combination of these vectors which lies in 5K. This result implies the best known bounds for several problems in discrepancy. Banaszczyk’s proof of this result is non-constructive and an open problem has been to give an efficient algorithm to find such a ± 1 combination of the vectors.

We present randomized algorithms that solve subset sum and knapsack instances with $n$ items in $O^*(2^{0.86n})$ time, where the $O^*(\cdot)$ notation suppresses factors polynomial in the input size, and polynomial space, assuming random read-only access to exponentially many random bits. These results can be extended to solve binary integer programming on $n$ variables with few constraints in a similar running time. We also show that for any constant $k\geq 2$, random instances of $k$-sum can be solved using $O(n^{k-0.5}\mathrm{polylog}(n))$ time and $O(\log n)$ space, without the assumption of random access to random bits. Underlying these results is an algorithm that determines whether two given lists of length $n$ with integers bounded by a polynomial in $n$ share a common value. Assuming random read-only access to random bits, we show that this problem can be solved using $O(\log n)$ space significantly faster than the trivial $O(n^2)$ time algorithm if no value occurs too often in the same list.

The partial coloring method is one of the most powerful and widely used method in combinatorial discrepancy problems. However, in many cases it leads to sub-optimal bounds as the partial coloring step must be iterated a logarithmic number of times, and the errors can add up in an adversarial way.

We present randomized algorithms that solve Subset Sum and Knapsack instances with n items in O*(20.86n) time, where the O*(·) notation suppresses factors polynomial in the input size, and polynomial space, assuming random read-only access to exponentially many random bits. These results can be extended to solve Binary Linear Programming on n variables with few constraints in a similar running time. We also show that for any constant k≥ 2, random instances of k-Sum can be solved using O(nk-0.5(n)) time and O(logn) space, without the assumption of random access to random bits.

An important theorem of Banaszczyk (Random Structures & Algorithms 1998) states that for any sequence of vectors of l_2 norm at most 1/5 and any convex body K of Gaussian measure 1/2 in R^n, there exists a signed combination of these vectors which lands inside K. A major open problem is to devise a constructive version of Banaszczyk's vector balancing theorem, i.e. to find an efficient algorithm which constructs the signed combination. We make progress towards this goal along several fronts. As our first contribution, we show an equivalence between Banaszczyk's theorem and the existence of O(1)-subgaussian distributions over signed combinations. For the case of symmetric convex bodies, our equivalence implies the existence of a universal signing algorithm (i.e. independent of the body), which simply samples from the subgaussian sign distribution and checks to see if the associated combination lands inside the body. For asymmetric convex bodies, we provide a novel recentering procedure, which allows us to reduce to the case where the body is symmetric. As our second main contribution, we show that the above framework can be efficiently implemented when the vectors have length O(1/sqrt{log n}), recovering Banaszczyk's results under this stronger assumption. More precisely, we use random walk techniques to produce the required O(1)-subgaussian signing distributions when the vectors have length O(1/sqrt{log n}), and use a stochastic gradient ascent method to implement the recentering procedure for asymmetric bodies.

We consider the problem of finding a low discrepancy coloring for sparse set systems where each element lies in at most t sets. We give an efficient algorithm that finds a coloring with discrepancy O((t log n)1/2), matching the best known non-constructive bound for the problem due to Banaszczyk. The previous algorithms only achieved an O(t1/2log n) bound. Our result also extends to the more general Komlós setting and gives an algorithmic O(log1/2n) bound.

Over the past several decades there has been steady progress towards the goal of polynomial-time approximation schemes (PTAS) for fundamental geometric combinatorial optimization problems. A foremost example is the geometric hitting set problem: given a set P of points and a set D of geometric objects, compute the minimum-sized subset of P that hits all objects in D. For the case where D is a set of disks in the plane, a PTAS was finally achieved in 2010, with a surprisingly simple algorithm based on local-search. Since then, local-search has turned out to be a powerful algorithmic approach towards achieving good approximation ratios for geometric problems (for geometric independent-set problem, for dominating sets, for the terrain guarding problem and several others). Unfortunately all these algorithms have the same limitation: local search is able to give a PTAS, but with large running times. That leaves open the question of whether a better understanding - both combinatorial and algorithmic - of local search and the problem can give a better approximation ratio in a more reasonable time. In this paper, we investigate this question for hitting sets for disks in the plane. We present tight approximation bounds for (3,2)-local search and give an (8+\epsilon)-approximation algorithm with expected running time ˜O(n^{2.34}); the previous-best result achieving a similar approximation ratio gave a 10-approximation in time O(n^{15}) -- that too just for unit disks. The techniques and ideas generalize to (4,3) local search. Furthermore, as mentioned earlier, local-search has been used for several other geometric optimization problems; for all these problems our results show that (3,2) local search gives an 8-approximation and no better \footnote{This is assuming the use of the standard framework. Improvement of the approximation factor by using additional properties specific to the problem may be possible.}. Similarly (4,3)-local search gives a 5-approximation for all these problems.