Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ziliang Deng

dblp:144/1186 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4767-2803ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50% Language models and text generation · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › classical planning
grounded planning
0.812024
Open Grounded Planning: Challenges and Benchmark Construction · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
large language model planning
0.812024
Open Grounded Planning: Challenges and Benchmark Construction · ACL (1) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 0.8large language model · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Open Grounded Planning: Challenges and Benchmark Construction
abstract
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has increasingly drawn attention to the use of LLMs for human-like planning.Existing work on LLM-based planning either focuses on leveraging the inherent language generation capabilities of LLMs to produce free-style plans or employs reinforcement learning approaches to learn decision-making for a limited set of actions within restricted environments.However, both approaches exhibit significant discrepancies between the open and executable requirements in real-world planning.In this paper, we propose a new planning task-open grounded planning.The primary objective of open grounded planning is to ask the model to generate an executable plan based on a variable action set, thereby ensuring the executability of the produced plan.To this end, we establish a benchmark for open grounded planning spanning a wide range of domains.Then we test current state-of-the-art LLMs along with five planning approaches, revealing that existing LLMs and methods still struggle to address the challenges posed by grounded planning in open domains.The outcomes of this paper define and establish a foundational dataset for open grounded planning, and shed light on the potential challenges and future directions of LLM-based planning.Our code and datasets are at https://github.com/Shiguang-Guo/
Shiguang Guo, Ziliang Deng, Yaojie Lu 0001, Xianpei Han, Le Sun 0001
ACL (1)2
2016 Early mover advantage in e-commerce platforms with low entry barriers: The role of customer relationship management capabilities
Shan Wang 0006, Hasan Cavusoglu, Ziliang Deng
Inf. Manag.3