Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Noor Ifada

dblp:144/2895 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-1193-6114ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Recommender systems · 54% Information retrieval · 30% Data mining · 16%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › side information integration
tag-based recommendation
0.422016
How Relevant is the Irrelevant Data: Leveraging the Tagging Data for a Learning-to-Rank Model · WSDM 2016
A tag-based personalized item recommendation system using tensor modeling and topic model approaches · SIGIR 2014
Information retrieval › evaluation › relevance judgment
graded relevance
0.212016
How Relevant is the Irrelevant Data: Leveraging the Tagging Data for a Learning-to-Rank Model · WSDM 2016
Recommender systems › personalized ranking
learning-to-rank recommendation
0.212016
How Relevant is the Irrelevant Data: Leveraging the Tagging Data for a Learning-to-Rank Model · WSDM 2016
Information retrieval
ranking
0.212016
How Relevant is the Irrelevant Data: Leveraging the Tagging Data for a Learning-to-Rank Model · WSDM 2016
Recommender systems
tensor-based recommendation
0.212014
A tag-based personalized item recommendation system using tensor modeling and topic model approaches · SIGIR 2014
Data mining › text mining
topic model
0.212014
A tag-based personalized item recommendation system using tensor modeling and topic model approaches · SIGIR 2014
Data mining › multidimensional data analysis › multiway data analysis › tensor analysis
tensor factorization
0.112016
How Relevant is the Irrelevant Data: Leveraging the Tagging Data for a Learning-to-Rank Model · WSDM 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tensor factorization · 0.2learning to rank · 0.2graded average precision · 0.2topic model · 0.2tensor decomposition · 0.2probabilistic ranking · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 How Relevant is the Irrelevant Data: Leveraging the Tagging Data for a Learning-to-Rank Model
abstract
For the task of tag-based item recommendations, the underlying tensor model faces several challenges such as high data sparsity and inferring latent factors effectively. To overcome the inherent sparsity issue of tensor models, we propose the graded-relevance interpretation scheme that leverages the tagging data effectively. Unlike the existing schemes, the graded-relevance scheme interprets the tagging data richly, differentiates the non-observed tagging data insightfully, and annotates each entry as one of the "relevant", "likely relevant", "irrelevant", or "indecisive" labels. To infer the latent factors of tensor models correctly to produce the high quality recommendation, we develop a novel learning-to-rank method, Go-Rank, that optimizes Graded Average Precision (GAP). Evaluating the proposed method on real-world datasets, we show that the proposed interpretation scheme produces a denser tensor model by revealing "relevant" entries from the previously assumed "irrelevant" entries. Optimizing GAP as the ranking metric, the quality of the recommendations generated by Go-Rank is found superior against the benchmarking methods.
Noor Ifada, Richi Nayak
WSDM1
2015 Do-Rank: DCG Optimization for Learning-to-Rank in Tag-Based Item Recommendation Systems
Noor Ifada, Richi Nayak
PAKDD (2)1
2014 A tag-based personalized item recommendation system using tensor modeling and topic model approaches
abstract
This research falls in the area of enhancing the quality of tag-based item recommendation systems. It aims to achieve this by employing a multi-dimensional user profile approach and by analyzing the semantic aspects of tags. Tag-based recommender systems have two characteristics that need to be carefully studied in order to build a reliable system. Firstly, the multi-dimensional correlation, called as tag assignment (user, item, tag), should be appropriately modelled in order to create the user profiles [1]. Secondly, the semantics behind the tags should be considered properly as the flexibility with their design can cause semantic problems such as synonymy and polysemy [2]. This research proposes to address these two challenges for building a tag-based item recommendation system by employing tensor modeling as the multi-dimensional user profile approach, and the topic model as the semantic analysis approach. The first objective is to optimize the tensor model reconstruction and to improve the model performance in generating quality recommendation. A novel Tensor-based Recommendation using Probabilistic Ranking (TRPR) method [3] has been developed. Results show this method to be scalable for large datasets and outperforming the benchmarking methods in terms of accuracy. The memory efficient loop implements the n-mode block-striped (matrix) product for tensor reconstruction as an approximation of the initial tensor. The probabilistic ranking calculates the probability of users to select candidate items using their tag preference list based on the entries generated from the reconstructed tensor.
Noor Ifada
SIGIR1
2014 A Two-Stage Item Recommendation Method Using Probabilistic Ranking with Reconstructed Tensor Model
Noor Ifada, Richi Nayak
UMAP1