Conjunctive Regular Path Queries, or CRPQs for short, are an essential construct in graph query languages. In this paper, we propose the first output-sensitive algorithm for evaluating acyclic CRPQs. It is output-sensitive in the sense that its complexity is a function of the sizes of the input graph and of the query output and not of the output sizes of the regular expressions that appear in the query, as these latter sizes can be larger than the query output size. Our algorithm proceeds in two stages. In the first stage, it contracts the given query into a free-connex acyclic one such that the output of the original query can be obtained from the output of the contracted one. This contraction removes bound variables by composing regular expressions or by promoting bound variables to free ones. The minimum necessary number of promoted bound variables gives the contraction width, which is a novel parameter specific to CRPQs. In the second stage, our algorithm evaluates the free-connex acyclic CRPQ and projects away the columns of the promoted bound variables. It ensures output-sensitivity by computing the calibrated outputs of the regular expressions appearing in the free-connex acyclic CRPQ in time proportional to their sizes. Our algorithm has lower complexity than the state-of-the-art approaches for problem instances where the query output is asymptotically smaller than the output sizes of the regular expressions that appear in the query.

The class of hierarchical queries is known to define the boundary of the dichotomy between tractability and intractability for the following two extensively studied problems about self-join free Boolean conjunctive queries (SJF-BCQ): (i) evaluating a SJF-BCQ on a tuple-independent probabilistic database; (ii) computing the Shapley value of a fact in a database on which a SJF-BCQ evaluates to true. Here, we establish that hierarchical queries define also the boundary of the dichotomy between tractability and intractability for a different natural algorithmic problem, which we call the bag-set maximization problem. The bag-set maximization problem associated with a SJF-BCQ Q asks: given a database D, find the biggest value that Q takes under bag semantics on a database D' obtained from D by adding at most θ facts from another given database D r . For non-hierarchical queries, we show that the bag-set maximization problem is an NP-complete optimization problem. More significantly, for hierarchical queries, we show that all three aforementioned problems (probabilistic query evaluation, Shapley value computation, and bag-set maximization) admit a single unifying polynomial-time algorithm that operates on an abstract algebraic structure, called a 2-monoid . Each of the three problems requires a different instantiation of the 2-monoid tailored for the problem at hand.

One fundamental question in database theory is the following: Given a Boolean conjunctive query Q , what is the best complexity for computing the answer to Q in terms of the input database size N ? When restricted to the class of combinatorial algorithms, it is known that the best known complexity for any query Q is captured by the submodular width of Q . However, beyond combinatorial algorithms, certain queries are known to admit faster algorithms that often involve a clever combination of fast matrix multiplication and data partitioning. Nevertheless, there is no systematic way to derive and analyze the complexity of such algorithms for arbitrary queries Q . In this work, we introduce a general framework that captures the best complexity for answering any Boolean conjunctive query Q using matrix multiplication. Our framework unifies both combinatorial and non-combinatorial techniques under the umbrella of information theory. It generalizes the notion of submodular width to a new stronger notion called the ω- submodular width that naturally incorporates the power of fast matrix multiplication. We describe a matching algorithm that computes the answer to any query Q in time corresponding to the ω- submodular width of Q . We show that our framework recovers the best known complexities for Boolean queries that have been studied in the literature, to the best of our knowledge, and also discovers new algorithms for some classes of queries that improve upon the best known complexities.

We study the classical evaluation problem for regular path queries: Given an edge-labeled graph and a regular path query, compute the set of pairs of vertices that are connected by paths that match the query. The Product Graph (PG) is the established evaluation approach for regular path queries. PG first constructs the product automaton of the data graph and the query and then uses breadth-first search to find the accepting states reachable from each initial state in the product automaton. Its data complexity is O(|V|⋅|E|), where V and E are the sets of vertices and respectively edges in the data graph. This complexity cannot be improved by combinatorial algorithms. In this paper, we introduce OSPG, an output-sensitive refinement of PG, whose data complexity is O(|E| 3/2 + min(OUT⋅√|E|, |V|⋅|E|)), where OUT is the number of distinct vertex pairs in the query output. OSPG's complexity is at most that of PG and can be asymptotically smaller for small output and sparse input. The improvement of OSPG over PG is due to the unnecessary time wasted by PG in the breadth-first search phase, in case a few output pairs are eventually discovered. For queries without Kleene star, the complexity of OSPG can be further improved to O(|E| + |E|⋅√OUT).

Cardinality estimation is the problem of estimating the size of the output of a query, without actually evaluating the query. The cardinality estimator is a critical piece of a query optimizer, and is often the main culprit when the optimizer chooses a poor plan. This paper introduces LpBound, a pessimistic cardinality estimator for multi-join queries (acyclic or cyclic) with selection predicates and group-by clauses. LpBound computes a guaranteed upper bound on the size of the query output using simple statistics on the input relations, consisting of ℓ p -norms of degree sequences. The bound is the optimal solution of a linear program whose constraints encode data statistics and Shannon inequalities. We introduce two optimizations that exploit the structure of the query in order to speed up the estimation time and make LpBound practical. We experimentally evaluate LpBound against a range of traditional, pessimistic, and machine learning-based estimators on the JOB, STATS, and subgraph matching benchmarks. Our main finding is that LpBound can be orders of magnitude more accurate than traditional estimators used in mainstream open-source and commercial database systems. Yet it has comparable low estimation time and space requirements. When injected the estimates of LpBound , Postgres derives query plans at least as good as those derived using the true cardinalities.

We study the dynamic query evaluation problem: Given a full conjunctive query Q and a sequence of updates to the input database, we construct a data structure that supports constant-delay enumeration of the tuples in the query output after each update. We show that a sequence of N insert-only updates to an initially empty database can be executed in total time O(N w(Q) ), where w(Q) is the fractional hypertree width of Q. This matches the complexity of the static query evaluation problem for Q and a database of size N. One corollary is that the amortized time per single-tuple insert is constant for acyclic full conjunctive queries. In contrast, we show that a sequence of N inserts and deletes can be executed in total time Õ(N w(Q') ), where Q' is obtained from Q by extending every relational atom with extra variables that represent the "lifespans" of tuples in the database. We show that this reduction is optimal in the sense that the static evaluation runtime of Q' provides a lower bound on the total update time for the output of Q. Our approach achieves amortized optimal update times for the hierarchical and Loomis-Whitney join queries.

Estimating the output size of a query is a fundamental yet longstanding problem in database query processing. Traditional cardinality estimators used by database systems can routinely underestimate the true output size by orders of magnitude, which leads to significant system performance penalty. Recently, upper bounds have been proposed that are based on information inequalities and incorporate sizes and max-degrees from input relations, yet their main benefit is limited to cyclic queries, because they degenerate to rather trivial formulas on acyclic queries. We introduce a significant extension of the upper bounds, by incorporating l p -norms of the degree sequences of join attributes. Our bounds are significantly lower than previously known bounds, even when applied to acyclic queries. These bounds are also based on information theory, they come with a matching query evaluation algorithm, are computable in exponential time in the query size, and are provably tight when all degrees are ''simple''.

Recursive queries have been traditionally studied in the framework of datalog, a language that restricts recursion to monotone queries over sets, which is guaranteed to converge in polynomial time in the size of the input. But modern big data systems require recursive computations beyond the Boolean space. In this paper we study the convergence of datalog when it is interpreted over an arbitrary semiring. We consider an ordered semiring, define the semantics of a datalog program as a least fixpoint in this semiring, and study the number of steps required to reach that fixpoint, if ever. We identify algebraic properties of the semiring that correspond to certain convergence properties of datalog programs. Finally, we describe a class of ordered semirings on which one can use the semi-naive evaluation algorithm on any datalog program.

Intersection joins over interval data are relevant in spatial and temporal data settings. A set of intervals join if their intersection is non-empty. In case of point intervals, the intersection join becomes the standard equality join. We establish the complexity of Boolean conjunctive queries with intersection joins by a many-one equivalence to disjunctions of Boolean conjunctive queries with equality joins. The complexity of any query with intersection joins is that of the hardest query with equality joins in the disjunction exhibited by our equivalence. This is captured by a new width measure called the ij-width. We also introduce a new syntactic notion of acyclicity called iota-acyclicity to characterise the class of Boolean queries with intersection joins that admit linear time computation modulo a poly-logarithmic factor in the data size. Iota-acyclicity is for intersection joins what alpha-acyclicity is for equality joins. It strictly sits between gamma-acyclicity and Berge-acyclicity. The intersection join queries that are not iota-acyclic are at least as hard as the Boolean triangle query with equality joins, which is widely considered not computable in linear time.

Most work on query optimization has concentrated on loop-free queries. However, data science and machine learning workloads today typically involve recursive or iterative computation. In this work, we propose a novel framework for optimizing recursive queries using methods from program synthesis. In particular, we introduce a simple yet powerful optimization rule called the "FGH-rule" which aims to find a faster way to evaluate a recursive program. The solution is found by making use of powerful tools, such as a program synthesizer, an SMT-solver, and an equality saturation system. We demonstrate the strength of the optimization by showing that the FGH-rule can lead to speedups up to 4 orders of magnitude on three, already optimized Datalog systems.

The query containment problem is a fundamental algorithmic problem in data management. While this problem is well understood under set semantics, it is by far less understood under bag semantics. In particular, it is a long-standing open question whether or not the conjunctive query containment problem under bag semantics is decidable. We unveil tight connections between information theory and the conjunctive query containment under bag semantics. These connections are established using information inequalities, which are considered to be the laws of information theory. Our first main result asserts that deciding the validity of a generalization of information inequalities is many-one equivalent to the restricted case of conjunctive query containment in which the containing query is acyclic; thus, either both these problems are decidable or both are undecidable. Our second main result identifies a new decidable case of the conjunctive query containment problem under bag semantics. Specifically, we give an exponential-time algorithm for conjunctive query containment under bag semantics, provided the containing query is chordal and admits a simple junction tree.

The query containment problem is a fundamental algorithmic problem in data management. While this problem is well understood under set semantics, it is by far less understood under bag semantics. In particular, it is a long-standing open question whether or not the conjunctive query containment problem under bag semantics is decidable. We unveil tight connections between information theory and the conjunctive query containment under bag semantics. These connections are established using information inequalities, which are considered to be the laws of information theory. Our first main result asserts that deciding the validity of a generalization of information inequalities is many-one equivalent to the restricted case of conjunctive query containment in which the containing query is acyclic; thus, either both these problems are decidable or both are undecidable. Our second main result identifies a new decidable case of the conjunctive query containment problem under bag semantics. Specifically, we give an exponential time algorithm for conjunctive query containment under bag semantics, provided the containing query is chordal and admits a simple junction tree.

Motivated by fundamental applications in databases and relational machine learning, we formulate and study the problem of answering functional aggregate queries (FAQ) in which some of the input factors are defined by a collection of additive inequalities between variables. We refer to these queries as FAQ-AI for short. To answer FAQ-AI in the Boolean semiring, we define relaxed tree decompositions and relaxed submodular and fractional hypertree width parameters. We show that an extension of the InsideOut algorithm using Chazelle’s geometric data structure for solving the semigroup range search problem can answer Boolean FAQ-AI in time given by these new width parameters. This new algorithm achieves lower complexity than known solutions for FAQ-AI. It also recovers some known results in database query answering. Our second contribution is a relaxation of the set of polymatroids that gives rise to the counting version of the submodular width, denoted by #subw. This new width is sandwiched between the submodular and the fractional hypertree widths. Any FAQ and FAQ-AI over one semiring can be answered in time proportional to #subw and respectively to the relaxed version of #subw. We present three applications of our FAQ-AI framework to relational machine learning: k -means clustering, training linear support vector machines, and training models using non-polynomial loss. These optimization problems can be solved over a database asymptotically faster than computing the join of the database relations.

Integrated solutions for analytics over relational databases are of great practical importance as they avoid the costly repeated loop data scientists have to deal with on a daily basis: select features from data residing in relational databases using feature extraction queries involving joins, projections, and aggregations; export the training dataset defined by such queries; convert this dataset into the format of an external learning tool; and train the desired model using this tool. These integrated solutions are also a fertile ground of theoretically fundamental and challenging problems at the intersection of relational and statistical data models. This article introduces a unified framework for training and evaluating a class of statistical learning models over relational databases. This class includes ridge linear regression, polynomial regression, factorization machines, and principal component analysis. We show that, by synergizing key tools from database theory such as schema information, query structure, functional dependencies, recent advances in query evaluation algorithms, and from linear algebra such as tensor and matrix operations, one can formulate relational analytics problems and design efficient (query and data) structure-aware algorithms to solve them. This theoretical development informed the design and implementation of the AC/DC system for structure-aware learning. We benchmark the performance of AC/DC against R, MADlib, libFM, and TensorFlow. For typical retail forecasting and advertisement planning applications, AC/DC can learn polynomial regression models and factorization machines with at least the same accuracy as its competitors and up to three orders of magnitude faster than its competitors whenever they do not run out of memory, exceed 24-hour timeout, or encounter internal design limitations.

We propose an algorithm for answering conjunctive queries with negation, where the negated relations have bounded degree. Its data complexity matches that of the best known algorithms for the positive subquery of the input query and is expressed in terms of the fractional hypertree width and the submodular width. The query complexity depends on the structure of the negated subquery; in general it is exponential in the number of join variables occurring in negated relations yet it becomes polynomial for several classes of queries. This algorithm relies on several contributions. We show how to rewrite queries with negation on bounded-degree relations into equivalent conjunctive queries with not-all-equal (NAE) predicates, which are a multi-dimensional analog of disequality (not-equal). We then generalize the known color-coding technique to conjunctions of NAE predicates and explain it via a Boolean tensor decomposition of conjunctions of NAE predicates. This decomposition can be achieved via a probabilistic construction that can be derandomized efficiently.

Motivated by fundamental applications in databases and relational machine learning, we formulate and study the problem of answering functional aggregate queries (FAQ) in which some of the input factors are defined by a collection of additive inequalities between variables. We refer to these queries as FAQ-AI for short. To answer FAQ-AI in the Boolean semiring, we define relaxed tree decompositions and relaxed submodular and fractional hypertree width parameters. We show that an extension of the InsideOut algorithm using Chazelle's geometric data structure for solving the semigroup range search problem can answer Boolean FAQ-AI in time given by these new width parameters. This new algorithm achieves lower complexity than known solutions for FAQ-AI. It also recovers some known results in database query answering. Our second contribution is a relaxation of the set of polymatroids that gives rise to the counting version of the submodular width, denoted by #subw. This new width is sandwiched between the submodular and the fractional hypertree widths. Any FAQ and FAQ-AI over one semiring can be answered in time proportional to #subw and respectively to the relaxed version of #subw. We present three applications of our FAQ-AI framework to relational machine learning: k-means clustering, training linear support vector machines, and training models using non-polynomial loss. These optimization problems can be solved over a database asymptotically faster than computing the join of the database relations.

This paper introduces LMFAO (Layered Multiple Functional Aggregate Optimization), an in-memory optimization and execution engine for batches of aggregates over the input database. The primary motivation for this work stems from the observation that for a variety of analytics over databases, their data-intensive tasks can be decomposed into group-by aggregates over the join of the input database relations. We exemplify the versatility and competitiveness of LMFAO for a handful of widely used analytics: learning ridge linear regression, classification trees, regression trees, and the structure of Bayesian networks using Chow-Liu trees; and data cubes used for exploration in data warehousing. LMFAO consists of several layers of logical and code optimizations that systematically exploit sharing of computation, parallelism, and code specialization. We conducted two types of performance benchmarks. In experiments with four datasets, LMFAO outperforms by several orders of magnitude on one hand, a commercial database system and MonetDB for computing batches of aggregates, and on the other hand, TensorFlow, Scikit, R, and AC/DC for learning a variety of models over databases.

In-database analytics is of great practical importance as it avoids the costly repeated loop data scientists have to deal with on a daily basis: select features, export the data, convert data format, train models using an external tool, reimport the parameters. It is also a fertile ground of theoretically fundamental and challenging problems at the intersection of relational and statistical data models. This paper introduces a unified framework for training and evaluating a class of statistical learning models inside a relational database. This class includes ridge linear regression, polynomial regression, factorization machines, and principal component analysis. We show that, by synergizing key tools from relational database theory such as schema information, query structure, recent advances in query evaluation algorithms, and from linear algebra such as various tensor and matrix operations, one can formulate in-database learning problems and design efficient algorithms to solve them. The algorithms and models proposed in the paper have already been implemented and deployed in retail-planning and forecasting applications, with significant performance benefits over out-of-database solutions that require the costly data-export loop.

Recent works on bounding the output size of a conjunctive query with functional dependencies and degree bounds have shown a deep connection between fundamental questions in information theory and database theory. We prove analogous output bounds for disjunctive datalog rules, and answer several open questions regarding the tightness and looseness of these bounds along the way. The bounds are intimately related to Shannon-type information inequalities. We devise the notion of a "proof sequence" of a specific class of Shannon-type information inequalities called "Shannon flow inequalities". We then show how a proof sequence can be used as symbolic instructions to guide an algorithm called PANDA, which answers disjunctive datalog rules within the size bound predicted. We show that PANDA can be used as a black-box to devise algorithms matching precisely the fractional hypertree width and the submodular width runtimes for aggregate and conjunctive queries with functional dependencies and degree bounds.

We define and study the Functional Aggregate Query (FAQ) problem, which encompasses many frequently asked questions in constraint satisfaction, databases, matrix operations, probabilistic graphical models and logic. This is our main conceptual contribution. We then present a simple algorithm called "InsideOut" to solve this general problem. InsideOut is a variation of the traditional dynamic programming approach for constraint programming based on variable elimination. Our variation adds a couple of simple twists to basic variable elimination in order to deal with the generality of FAQ, to take full advantage of Grohe and Marx's fractional edge cover framework, and of the analysis of recent worst-case optimal relational join algorithms.

Recently, Gottlob, Lee, Valiant, and Valiant (GLVV) presented an output size bound for join queries with functional dependencies (FD), based on a linear program on polymatroids. GLVV bound strictly generalizes the bound of Atserias, Grohe and Marx (AGM) for queries with no FD, in which case there are known algorithms running within the AGM-bound and thus are worst-case optimal. A main result of this paper is an algorithm for computing join queries with FDs, running within GLVV bound up to a poly-log factor. In particular, our algorithm is worst-case optimal for any query where the GLVV bound is tight. As an unexpected by-product, our algorithm manages to solve a harder problem, where (some) input relations may have prescribed maximum degree bounds, of which both functional dependencies and cardinality bounds are special cases.

We present a simple geometric framework for the relational join. Using this framework, we design an algorithm that achieves the fractional hypertree-width bound, which generalizes classical and recent worst-case algorithmic results on computing joins. In addition, we use our framework and the same algorithm to show a series of what are colloquially known as beyond worst-case results. The framework allows us to prove results for data stored in BTrees, multidimensional data structures, and even multiple indices per table. A key idea in our framework is formalizing the inference one does with an index as a type of geometric resolution, transforming the algorithmic problem of computing joins to a geometric problem. Our notion of geometric resolution can be viewed as a geometric analog of logical resolution. In addition to the geometry and logic connections, our algorithm can also be thought of as backtracking search with memoization.

We present a simple geometric framework for the relational join. Using this framework, we design an algorithm that achieves the fractional hypertree-width bound, which generalizes classical and recent worst-case algorithmic results on computing joins. In addition, we use our framework and the same algorithm to show a series of what are colloquially known as beyond worst-case results. The framework allows us to prove results for data stored in Btrees, multidimensional data structures, and even multiple indices per table. A key idea in our framework is formalizing the inference one does with an index as a type of geometric resolution; transforming the algorithmic problem of computing joins to a geometric problem. Our notion of geometric resolution can be viewed as a geometric analog of logical resolution. In addition to the geometry and logic connections, our algorithm can also be thought of as backtracking search with memoization.