Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Neelam Surana

dblp:144/8123 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-7841-8541ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Memory systems · 50% Integrated circuit design · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems › memory hierarchy
cache hierarchy
0.712023
HyGain: High-performance, Energy-efficient Hybrid Gain Cell-based Cache Hierarchy · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2023
Integrated circuit design
low-power circuit design
0.712023
HyGain: High-performance, Energy-efficient Hybrid Gain Cell-based Cache Hierarchy · ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

staggered refresh · 0.7half VDD precharge · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 HyGain: High-performance, Energy-efficient Hybrid Gain Cell-based Cache Hierarchy
abstract
In this article, we propose a “full-stack” solution to designing high-apacity and low-latency on-chip cache hierarchies by starting at the circuit level of the hardware design stack. We propose a novel half V DD precharge 2T Gain Cell (GC) design for the cache hierarchy. The GC has several desirable characteristics, including ~50% higher storage density and ~50% lower dynamic energy as compared to the traditional 6T SRAM, even after accounting for peripheral circuit overheads. We also demonstrate data retention time of 350 us (~17.5× of eDRAM) at 28 nm technology with V DD = 0.9V and temperature = 27°C that, combined with optimizations like staggered refresh, makes it an ideal candidate to architect all levels of on-chip caches. We show that compared to 6T SRAM, for a given area budget, GC-based caches, on average, provide 30% and 36% increase in IPC for single- and multi-programmed workloads, respectively, on contemporary workloads, including SPEC CPU 2017. We also observe dynamic energy savings of 42% and 34% for single- and multi-programmed workloads, respectively. Finally, in a quest to utilize the best of all worlds, we combine GC with STT-RAM to create hybrid hierarchies. We show that a hybrid hierarchy with GC caches at L1 and L2 and an LLC split between GC and STT-RAM is able to provide a 46% benefit in energy-delay product (EDP) as compared to an all-SRAM design, and 13% as compared to an all-GC cache hierarchy, averaged across multi-programmed workloads.
Sarabjeet Singh, Neelam Surana, Kailash Prasad, Pranjali Jain, Joycee Mekie, Manu Awasthi
ACM Trans. Archit. Code Optim.2
2020 Robust and High-Performance 12-T Interlocked SRAM for In-Memory Computing
abstract
In this paper, we analyze the existing SRAM based In-Memory Computing(IMC) proposals and show through exhaustive simulations that they fail under process variations. 6-T SRAM, 8-T SRAM, and 10-T SRAM based IMC architectures suffer from compute-disturb (stored data flips during IMC), compute-failure (provides false computation results), and half-select failures, respectively. To circumvent these issues, we propose a novel 12-T Dual Port Dual Interlockedstorage Cell (DPDICE) SRAM. DPDICE SRAM based IMC architecture(DPDICE-IMC) can perform essential boolean functions successfully in a single cycle and can perform basic arithmetic operations such as add and multiply. The most striking feature is that DPDICE-IMC architecture can perform IMC on two datasets simultaneously, thus doubling the throughput. Cumulatively, the proposed DPDICE-IMC is 26.7%, 8×, and 28% better than 6-T SRAM, 8-T SRAM, and 10-T SRAM based IMC architectures, respectively.
Neelam Surana, Mili Lavania, Abhishek Barma, Joycee Mekie
DATE1
2020 A Low-Voltage Split Memory Architecture for Binary Neural Networks
abstract
This paper performs an in-depth study of error-resiliency of Neural Networks(NNs). Our investigation has resulted into two important findings. First, we found that Binary Neural Networks (BNNs) are more error-tolerant than 32-bits NNs. Second, in BNNs the network accuracy is more sensitive to errors in Batch Normalization Parameters(BNPs) than that in binary weights. A detailed discussion on the same is presented in the paper. Based on these findings, we propose a split memory architecture for low power BNNs, suitable for IoTs. In the proposed split memory architecture, weights are stored in area-efficient 6T SRAM, and BNPs are stored in robust 12T SRAM. The proposed split memory architecture for BNNs synthesized in UMC 28nm is highly energy efficient as the Vmin(minimum operating voltage) can be reduced to 0.36 V, 0.52 V, and 0.52 V for the MNIST, CIFAR10, and ImageNet datasets respectively, with accuracy drop of less than 1%.
Joydeep Kumar Devnath, Neelam Surana, Joycee Mekie
ISCAS2