Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nikita Kitaev

dblp:145/2370 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
7as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 7 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
12 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 43% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% Efficient and distributed learning · 7%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 25 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
2.252022
Learned Incremental Representations for Parsing · ACL (1) 2022
Unsupervised Parsing via Constituency Tests · EMNLP (1) 2020
Tetra-Tagging: Word-Synchronous Parsing with Linear-Time Inference · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
constituency parsing
2.052020
Unsupervised Parsing via Constituency Tests · EMNLP (1) 2020
Tetra-Tagging: Word-Synchronous Parsing with Linear-Time Inference · ACL 2020
Multilingual Constituency Parsing with Self-Attention and Pre-Training · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
incremental parsing
0.612022
Learned Incremental Representations for Parsing · ACL (1) 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
efficient transformer
0.622020
Reformer: The Efficient Transformer · ICLR 2020
SMYRF - Efficient Attention using Asymmetric Clustering · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › attention efficiency
attention approximation
0.412020
SMYRF - Efficient Attention using Asymmetric Clustering · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism
0.412020
SMYRF - Efficient Attention using Asymmetric Clustering · NeurIPS 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text representation
contextualized word embeddings
0.412020
Multilingual Alignment of Contextual Word Representations · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation matching › feature alignment › embedding alignment
cross-lingual alignment
0.412020
Multilingual Alignment of Contextual Word Representations · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
efficient attention
0.412020
SMYRF - Efficient Attention using Asymmetric Clustering · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
long sequence modeling
0.412020
Reformer: The Efficient Transformer · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.412020
SMYRF - Efficient Attention using Asymmetric Clustering · NeurIPS 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › statistical parsing
unsupervised parsing
0.412020
Unsupervised Parsing via Constituency Tests · EMNLP (1) 2020
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization
0.412019
Cross-Domain Generalization of Neural Constituency Parsers · ACL (1) 2019
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › cross-lingual transfer
multilingual transfer
0.412019
Multilingual Constituency Parsing with Self-Attention and Pre-Training · ACL (1) 2019
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding
0.312017
Where is Misty? Interpreting Spatial Descriptors by Modeling Regions in Space · EMNLP 2017
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding › language grounding
spatial language grounding
0.312017
Where is Misty? Interpreting Spatial Descriptors by Modeling Regions in Space · EMNLP 2017
Robotics › Robot manipulation
cluttered environments
0.212015
Physics-based trajectory optimization for grasping in cluttered environments · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.212015
Physics-based trajectory optimization for grasping in cluttered environments · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
grasp planning
0.212015
Physics-based trajectory optimization for grasping in cluttered environments · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.212015
Physics-based trajectory optimization for grasping in cluttered environments · ICRA 2015
Operating systems
system services
0.212013
BOSS: Building Operating System Services · NSDI 2013
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.112020
SMYRF - Efficient Attention using Asymmetric Clustering · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
high-resolution image synthesis
0.112020
SMYRF - Efficient Attention using Asymmetric Clustering · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
self-attention
0.112018
Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encoder · ACL (1) 2018
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
region localization
0.112017
Where is Misty? Interpreting Spatial Descriptors by Modeling Regions in Space · EMNLP 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

locality-sensitive hashing · 0.9pre-trained embeddings · 0.6discrete labeling · 0.6supertagging · 0.4reversible layers · 0.4refinement · 0.4neural scoring · 0.4neural acceptability model · 0.4multilingual alignment · 0.4constituency test · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Learned Incremental Representations for Parsing
abstract
We present an incremental syntactic representation that consists of assigning a single discrete label to each word in a sentence, where the label is predicted using strictly incremental processing of a prefix of the sentence, and the sequence of labels for a sentence fully determines a parse tree.Our goal is to induce a syntactic representation that commits to syntactic choices only as they are incrementally revealed by the input, in contrast with standard representations that must make output choices such as attachments speculatively and later throw out conflicting analyses.Our learned representations achieve 93.72 F1 on the Penn Treebank with as few as 5 bits per word, and at 8 bits per word they achieve 94.97 F1, which is comparable with other state of the art parsing models when using the same pre-trained embeddings.We also provide an analysis of the representations learned by our system, investigating properties such as the interpretable syntactic features captured by the system and mechanisms for deferred resolution of syntactic ambiguities.
Nikita Kitaev, Thomas Lu, Daniel Klein 0001
ACL (1)1
2020 Tetra-Tagging: Word-Synchronous Parsing with Linear-Time Inference
abstract
We present a constituency parsing algorithm that, like a supertagger, works by assigning labels to each word in a sentence.In order to maximally leverage current neural architectures, the model scores each word's tags in parallel, with minimal task-specific structure.After scoring, a left-to-right reconciliation phase extracts a tree in (empirically) linear time.Our parser achieves 95.4 F1 on the WSJ test set while also achieving substantial speedups compared to current state-of-the-art parsers with comparable accuracies.
Nikita Kitaev, Daniel Klein 0001
ACL1
2020 Unsupervised Parsing via Constituency Tests
abstract
We propose a method for unsupervised parsing based on the linguistic notion of a constituency test.One type of constituency test involves modifying the sentence via some transformation (e.g.replacing the span with a pronoun) and then judging the result (e.g.checking if it is grammatical).Motivated by this idea, we design an unsupervised parser by specifying a set of transformations and using an unsupervised neural acceptability model to make grammaticality decisions.To produce a tree given a sentence, we score each span by aggregating its constituency test judgments, and we choose the binary tree with the highest total score.While this approach already achieves performance in the range of current methods, we further improve accuracy by fine-tuning the grammaticality model through a refinement procedure, where we alternate between improving the estimated trees and improving the grammaticality model.The refined model achieves 62.8 F1 on the Penn Treebank test set, an absolute improvement of 7.6 points over the previous best published result.
Steven Cao, Nikita Kitaev, Daniel Klein 0001
EMNLP (1)2
2020 Multilingual Alignment of Contextual Word Representations
Steven Cao, Nikita Kitaev, Daniel Klein 0001
ICLR2
2020 Reformer: The Efficient Transformer
Nikita Kitaev, Lukasz Kaiser, Anselm Levskaya
ICLR1
2020 SMYRF - Efficient Attention using Asymmetric Clustering
abstract
We propose a novel type of balanced clustering algorithm to approximate attention. Attention complexity is reduced from $O(N^2)$ to $O(N \log N)$, where N is the sequence length. Our algorithm, SMYRF, uses Locality Sensitive Hashing (LSH) in a novel way by defining new Asymmetric transformations and an adaptive scheme that produces balanced clusters. The biggest advantage of SMYRF is that it can be used as a drop-in replacement for dense attention layers without any retraining. On the contrary, prior fast attention methods impose constraints (e.g. tight queries and keys) and require re-training from scratch. We apply our method to pre-trained state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing and Computer Vision models and we report significant memory and speed benefits. Notably, SMYRF-BERT outperforms (slightly) BERT on GLUE, while using 50% less memory. We also show that SMYRF can be used interchangeably with dense attention before and after training. Finally, we use SMYRF to train GANs with attention in high resolutions. Using a single TPU, we train BigGAN on Celeba-HQ, with attention at resolution 128x128 and 256x256, capable of generating realistic human faces.
Giannis Daras, Nikita Kitaev, Augustus Odena, Alexandros G. Dimakis
NeurIPS2
2019 Cross-Domain Generalization of Neural Constituency Parsers
abstract
Neural parsers obtain state-of-the-art results on benchmark treebanks for constituency parsing-but to what degree do they generalize to other domains?We present three results about the generalization of neural parsers in a zero-shot setting: training on trees from one corpus and evaluating on out-of-domain corpora.First, neural and non-neural parsers generalize comparably to new domains.Second, incorporating pre-trained encoder representations into neural parsers substantially improves their performance across all domains, but does not give a larger relative improvement for out-of-domain treebanks.Finally, despite the rich input representations they learn, neural parsers still benefit from structured output prediction of output trees, yielding higher exact match accuracy and stronger generalization both to larger text spans and to out-of-domain corpora.We analyze generalization on English and Chinese corpora, and in the process obtain state-of-the-art parsing results for the Brown, Genia, and English Web treebanks.
Daniel Fried, Nikita Kitaev, Daniel Klein 0001
ACL (1)2
2019 CoDraw: Collaborative Drawing as a Testbed for Grounded Goal-driven Communication
abstract
Jin-Hwa Kim, Nikita Kitaev, Xinlei Chen, Marcus Rohrbach, Byoung-Tak Zhang, Yuandong Tian, Dhruv Batra, Devi Parikh. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2019.
Jin-Hwa Kim, Nikita Kitaev, Xinlei Chen, Marcus Rohrbach, Byoung-Tak Zhang, Yuandong Tian, Dhruv Batra, Devi Parikh
ACL (1)2
2019 Multilingual Constituency Parsing with Self-Attention and Pre-Training
abstract
We show that constituency parsing benefits from unsupervised pre-training across a variety of languages and a range of pre-training conditions.We first compare the benefits of no pre-training, fastText (Bojanowski et al., 2017;Mikolov et al., 2018), ELMo (Peters et al., 2018), and BERT (Devlin et al., 2018a) for English and find that BERT outperforms ELMo, in large part due to increased model capacity, whereas ELMo in turn outperforms the non-contextual fastText embeddings.We also find that pre-training is beneficial across all 11 languages tested; however, large model sizes (more than 100 million parameters) make it computationally expensive to train separate models for each language.To address this shortcoming, we show that joint multilingual pre-training and fine-tuning allows sharing all but a small number of parameters between ten languages in the final model.The 10x reduction in model size compared to fine-tuning one model per language causes only a 3.2% relative error increase in aggregate.We further explore the idea of joint fine-tuning and show that it gives low-resource languages a way to benefit from the larger datasets of other languages.Finally, we demonstrate new state-ofthe-art results for 11 languages, including English (95.8 F1) and Chinese (91.8 F1).
Nikita Kitaev, Steven Cao, Daniel Klein 0001
ACL (1)1
2018 Constituency Parsing with a Self-Attentive Encoder
abstract
We demonstrate that replacing an LSTM encoder with a self-attentive architecture can lead to improvements to a state-ofthe-art discriminative constituency parser.The use of attention makes explicit the manner in which information is propagated between different locations in the sentence, which we use to both analyze our model and propose potential improvements.For example, we find that separating positional and content information in the encoder can lead to improved parsing accuracy.Additionally, we evaluate different approaches for lexical representation.Our parser achieves new state-ofthe-art results for single models trained on the Penn Treebank: 93.55 F1 without the use of any external data, and 95.13 F1 when using pre-trained word representations.Our parser also outperforms the previous best-published accuracy figures on 8 of the 9 languages in the SPMRL dataset.
Nikita Kitaev, Daniel Klein 0001
ACL (1)1
2017 Where is Misty? Interpreting Spatial Descriptors by Modeling Regions in Space
abstract
We present a model for locating regions in space based on natural language descriptions.Starting with a 3D scene and a sentence, our model is able to associate words in the sentence with regions in the scene, interpret relations such as on top of or next to, and finally locate the region described in the sentence.All components form a single neural network that is trained end-to-end without prior knowledge of object segmentation.To evaluate our model, we construct and release a new dataset consisting of Minecraft scenes with crowdsourced natural language descriptions.We achieve a 32% relative error reduction compared to a strong neural baseline.
Nikita Kitaev, Daniel Klein 0001
EMNLP1
2015 Physics-based trajectory optimization for grasping in cluttered environments
abstract
Grasping an object in a cluttered, unorganized environment is challenging because of unavoidable contacts and interactions between the robot and multiple immovable (static) and movable (dynamic) obstacles in the environment. Planning an approach trajectory for grasping in such situations can benefit from physics-based simulations that describe the dynamics of the interaction between the robot manipulator and the environment. In this work, we present a physics-based trajectory optimization approach for planning grasp approach trajectories. We present novel cost objectives and identify failure modes relevant to grasping in cluttered environments. Our approach uses rollouts of physics-based simulations to compute the gradient of the objective and of the dynamics. Our approach naturally generates behaviors such as choosing to push objects that are less likely to topple over, recognizing and avoiding situations which might cause a cascade of objects to fall over, and adjusting the manipulator trajectory to push objects aside in a direction orthogonal to the grasping direction. We present results in simulation for grasping in a variety of cluttered environments with varying levels of density of obstacles in the environment. Our experiments in simulation indicate that our approach outperforms a baseline approach that considers multiple straight-line trajectories modified to account for static obstacles by an aggregate success rate of 14% with varying degrees of object clutter.
Nikita Kitaev, Igor Mordatch, Sachin Patil, Pieter Abbeel
ICRA1
2013 BOSS: Building Operating System Services
Stephen Dawson-Haggerty, Andrew Krioukov, Jay Taneja, Sagar Karandikar, Gabe Fierro, Nikita Kitaev, David E. Culler
NSDI6