VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ke Zhan
dblp:146/0827
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-8747-2892ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 91% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 9% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Triple-Fact Retriever: An explainable reasoning retrieval model for multi-hop QA problem · ICDE 2022 Hyperlink-induced Pre-training for Passage Retrieval in Open-domain Question Answering · ACL (1) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
multi-hop question answering |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Triple-Fact Retriever: An explainable reasoning retrieval model for multi-hop QA problem · ICDE 2022 Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need · SIGIR 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need · SIGIR 2021 Hyperlink-induced Pre-training for Passage Retrieval in Open-domain Question Answering · ACL (1) 2022 |
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval
explainable search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Triple-Fact Retriever: An explainable reasoning retrieval model for multi-hop QA problem · ICDE 2022 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval
passage retrieval |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Hyperlink-induced Pre-training for Passage Retrieval in Open-domain Question Answering · ACL (1) 2022 |
Information retrieval › ranking › text ranking
document ranking |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need · SIGIR 2021 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You Need · SIGIR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semantic matching · 1.1pre-trained language model · 1.1hyperlink-induced pre-training · 1.1contrastive learning · 1.1supervised learning · 1.0negative sampling · 1.0dense retrieval · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | An expert-informed and interpretable Naive Bayes framework for forest seedling classification from small samples
Ke Zhan, Jihe Zhang, Ailing Zhao, Jianguo Cai |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 1 |
| 2022 | Hyperlink-induced Pre-training for Passage Retrieval in Open-domain Question AnsweringabstractJiawei Zhou, Xiaoguang Li, Lifeng Shang, Lan Luo, Ke Zhan, Enrui Hu, Xinyu Zhang, Hao Jiang, Zhao Cao, Fan Yu, Xin Jiang, Qun Liu, Lei Chen. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022. Jiawei Zhou 0003, Lifeng Shang, Ke Zhan, Enrui Hu, Xinyu Zhang 0019, Hao Jiang 0022, Zhao Cao, Fan Yu 0004, Xin Jiang 0002, Qun Liu 0001, Lei Chen 0002 |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2022 | Triple-Fact Retriever: An explainable reasoning retrieval model for multi-hop QA problemabstractNowadays, multi-hop question answer (QA) problem is challenging and not well solved in the QA community. The dominant bottleneck of the multi-hop QA problem is the need for a reasoning retriever to fetch a document path from an open-domain corpus (e.g., Wikipedia). A reasoning retriever aims to collect an evidence document from large corpora at one hop retrieval and aggregate the evidence for subsequent hop retrieval, which yields a document path after multi-hop retrieval. There exist two challenges, (1) to fetch the evidence document in an efficient and explainable way at one hop retrieval and (2) to update the question information by aggregating the evidence from the retrieved document after each hop retrieval. To address these two challenges, we propose a triple-fact-based retrieval model to effectively retrieve a related document path in an explainable way for each question. We extract a structured representation from the unstructured document and utilize the knowledge of pre-trained language model (PLM) to do the semantic-level matching between the question and document. We evaluate the proposed Triple-fact Retriever model on the recently proposed open-domain multi-hop QA dataset, HotpotQA, and a cross-document multi-step Reading Comprehension dataset, Wikihop. The results11The source code is available on our website: https://github.com/Rebaccamin/triple_retriever. demonstrate that the Triple-fact retriever outperforms the existing baseline retrieval works. Chengmin Wu, Enrui Hu, Ke Zhan, Xinyu Zhang 0019, Hao Jiang 0022, Zhao Cao, Fan Yu 0004, Lei Chen 0002 |
ICDE | 3 |
| 2021 | Answer Complex Questions: Path Ranker Is All You NeedabstractCurrently, the most popular method for open-domain Question Answering (QA) adopts "Retriever and Reader" pipeline, where the retriever extracts a list of candidate documents from a large set of documents followed by a ranker to rank the most relevant documents and the reader extracts answer from the candidates. Existing studies take the greedy strategy in the sense that they only use samples for ranking at the current hop, and ignore the global information across the whole documents. In this paper, we propose a purely rank-based framework Thinking Path Re-Ranker (TPRR), which is comprised of Thinking Path Ranker (TPR) for generating document sequences called "a path" and External Path Reranker (EPR) for selecting the best path from candidate paths generated by TPR. Specifically, TPR leverages the scores of a dense model and conditional probabilities to score the full paths. Moreover, to further enhance the performance of the dense ranker in the iterative training, we propose a "thinking" negatives selection method that the top-K candidates treated as negatives in the current hop are adjusted dynamically through supervised signals. After achieving multiple supporting paths through TPR, the EPR component which integrates several fine-grained training tasks for QA is used to select the best path for answer extraction. We have tested our proposed solution on the multi-hop dataset "HotpotQA" with a full wiki set ting, and the results show that TPRR significantly outperforms the existing state-of-the-art models. Moreover, our method has won the first place in the HotpotQA official leaderboard since Feb 1, 2021 under the Fullwiki setting. Code is available at https://gitee.com/mindspore/mindspore/ tree/master/model_zoo/research/nlp/tprr. Xinyu Zhang 0019, Ke Zhan, Enrui Hu, Chengzhen Fu, Hao Jiang 0022, Yantao Jia, Fan Yu 0004, Zhicheng Dou, Zhao Cao, Lei Chen 0002 |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2020 | Performance Optimization for Feature Extraction Section of DeepChem
Ke Zhan, Zhonghua Lu, Yunquan Zhang |
ICA3PP (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | Directed-Weighting Group Lasso For Eltwise Blocked CNN Pruning
Ke Zhan, Shimiao Jiang |
BMVC | 1 |