Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ophélie Lacroix

dblp:146/3943 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 65% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 18% Language models and text generation · 18%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer
0.412020
Weakly Supervised POS Taggers Perform Poorly on Truly Low-Resource Languages · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
grammatical error correction
0.412020
Grammatical Error Correction in Low Error Density Domains: A New Benchmark and Analyses · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling › part-of-speech tagging
low-resource POS tagging
0.412020
Weakly Supervised POS Taggers Perform Poorly on Truly Low-Resource Languages · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.412020
Weakly Supervised POS Taggers Perform Poorly on Truly Low-Resource Languages · AAAI 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis
0.312017
Does syntax help discourse segmentation? Not so much · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text segmentation
discourse segmentation
0.312017
Does syntax help discourse segmentation? Not so much · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing
0.112017
Does syntax help discourse segmentation? Not so much · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.112017
Does syntax help discourse segmentation? Not so much · EMNLP 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weak supervision · 0.4cross-lingual transfer · 0.4part-of-speech tagging · 0.3dependency parsing · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 DDisCo: A Discourse Coherence Dataset for Danish
abstract
To date, there has been no resource for studying discourse coherence on real-world Danish texts. Discourse coherence has mostly been approached with the assumption that incoherent texts can be represented by coherent texts in which sentences have been shuffled. However, incoherent real-world texts rarely resemble that. We thus present DDisCo, a dataset including text from the Danish Wikipedia and Reddit annotated for discourse coherence. We choose to annotate real-world texts instead of relying on artificially incoherent text for training and testing models. Then, we evaluate the performance of several methods, including neural networks, on the dataset.
Linea Flansmose Mikkelsen, Oliver Kinch, Anders Jess Pedersen, Ophélie Lacroix
LREC4
2020 Weakly Supervised POS Taggers Perform Poorly on Truly Low-Resource Languages
abstract
Part-of-speech (POS) taggers for low-resource languages which are exclusively based on various forms of weak supervision – e.g., cross-lingual transfer, type-level supervision, or a combination thereof – have been reported to perform almost as well as supervised ones. However, weakly supervised POS taggers are commonly only evaluated on languages that are very different from truly low-resource languages, and the taggers use sources of information, like high-coverage and almost error-free dictionaries, which are likely not available for resource-poor languages. We train and evaluate state-of-the-art weakly supervised POS taggers for a typologically diverse set of 15 truly low-resource languages. On these languages, given a realistic amount of resources, even our best model gets only less than half of the words right. Our results highlight the need for new and different approaches to POS tagging for truly low-resource languages.
Katharina Kann, Ophélie Lacroix, Anders Søgaard
AAAI2
2020 Grammatical Error Correction in Low Error Density Domains: A New Benchmark and Analyses
abstract
Evaluation of grammatical error correction (GEC) systems has primarily focused on essays written by non-native learners of English, which however is only part of the full spectrum of GEC applications.We aim to broaden the target domain of GEC and release CWEB, a new benchmark for GEC consisting of website text generated by English speakers of varying levels of proficiency.Website data is a common and important domain that contains far fewer grammatical errors than learner essays, which we show presents a challenge to stateof-the-art GEC systems.We demonstrate that a factor behind this is the inability of systems to rely on a strong internal language model in low error density domains.We hope this work shall facilitate the development of opendomain GEC models that generalize to different topics and genres.
Simon Flachs, Ophélie Lacroix, Helen Yannakoudakis, Marek Rei, Anders Søgaard
EMNLP (1)2
2017 Does syntax help discourse segmentation? Not so much
abstract
Discourse segmentation is the first step in building discourse parsers.Most work on discourse segmentation does not scale to real-world discourse parsing across languages, for two reasons: (i) models rely on constituent trees, and (ii) experiments have relied on gold standard identification of sentence and token boundaries.We therefore investigate to what extent constituents can be replaced with universal dependencies, or left out completely, as well as how state-of-the-art segmenters fare in the absence of sentence boundaries.Our results show that dependency information is less useful than expected, but we provide a fully scalable, robust model that only relies on part-of-speech information, and show that it performs well across languages in the absence of any gold-standard annotation.
Chloé Braud, Ophélie Lacroix, Anders Søgaard
EMNLP2
2016 Frustratingly Easy Cross-Lingual Transfer for Transition-Based Dependency Parsing
abstract
Ophélie Lacroix, Lauriane Aufrant, Guillaume Wisniewski, François Yvon. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2016.
Ophélie Lacroix, Lauriane Aufrant, Guillaume Wisniewski, François Yvon
HLT-NAACL1
2014 A Three-Step Transition-Based System for Non-Projective Dependency Parsing
Ophélie Lacroix, Denis Béchet
COLING1
2014 Validation Issues induced by an Automatic Pre-Annotation Mechanism in the Building of Non-projective Dependency Treebanks
Ophélie Lacroix, Denis Béchet
LREC1