VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nathan Sommer
dblp:146/9464
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-6389-6517ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 8 · 8 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Scaffolded Projects for the Social Good: Integrating Sustainable Service-Learning in Software EngineeringabstractScaffolded Projects for the Social Good (SPSG) equips computing educators with a low-barrier framework for embedding sustainable, community-partnered software projects into existing software-engineering and capstone courses. In this three-hour, hands-on tutorial participants will step through the full SPSG lifecycle using a realistic nonprofit case study. Interactive segments include rapid feasibility vetting with a partner conversation guide; creation of a Team Agreement to set expectations; simulated client interviews that seed a well-scoped product backlog; application of detailed sprint-evaluation rubrics that deliver formative feedback; and knowledge-transfer techniques that enable seamless hand-off between semesters. Small-group work and whole-room debriefs provide immediate practice and peer feedback. The session culminates in an implementation clinic where facilitators help participants sketch a first-semester adoption plan aligned with local constraints and program learning outcomes. Attendees will leave with an editable toolkit including rubrics, deliverable templates, project-screening checklists, and other adoption aids, ready for use next term. After completing the tutorial, participants will be able to (1) identify feasible, socially impactful projects and build productive relationships with community partners; (2) scaffold student deliverables with meaningful, iterative feedback; and (3) sustain multi-semester projects without adding new courses or staff. The tutorial targets instructors of upper-division software-engineering, capstone, or project-based courses who seek to broaden students' technical competence, professional identity, and civic responsibility through authentic computing-for-social-good experiences. Stanislav Kurkovsky, Chad A. Williams, Michael Goldweber, Nathan Sommer |
SIGCSE (2) | 4 |
| 2025 | Community-Engaged Software Projects: A Lightweight ApproachabstractWe describe a lightweight approach to community-engaged service learning, structured as a semester-long hackathon where students explore socially relevant problems through problem definition, ethical analysis, and rapid prototyping. By eliminating the logistical challenges of traditional service-learning projects, this approach provides a scalable way to integrate Computing for the Social Good into the curriculum while retaining key educational benefits. Michael Goldweber, Stanislav Kurkovsky, Chad A. Williams, Nathan Sommer |
ITiCSE (2) | 4 |
| 2025 | A Scaffolding-based Approach for Addressing Challenges of Service Learning AdoptionabstractRecent publications strongly support refocusing undergraduate CS education toward competency-based learning. This shift places increased responsibility on departments to prepare responsible computing practitioners who appreciate how computing is inextricably intertwined with society. It emphasizes that content coverage is less important than authentic experiences that develop both ethical decision-making and industry-desired technical skills. One timetested successful strategy that helps meet these goals is communitybased service learning (CBSL). However, while CBSL has a strong track record, service learning can be challenging to implement and may not always guarantee successful student experiences. Stanislav Kurkovsky, Michael Goldweber, Chad A. Williams, Nathan Sommer |
SIGCSE (2) | 4 |
| 2025 | Best Practices in Software Projects with Community PartnersabstractSuccessfully implementing service learning presents many challenges. This is particularly true when working with community partners which are frequently small, understaffed non-profits, lacking in technical expertise. Participating faculty not only manage the student end of the partnership, but often need to manage/educate the community partner as well. Stanislav Kurkovsky, Michael Goldweber, Chad A. Williams, Nathan Sommer |
SIGCSE (2) | 4 |
| 2024 | WIP: A Systematic Approach to Screen and Align Service-Learning Projects for Optimal Student OutcomesabstractThis innovative practice work in progress paper presents a systematic approach for screening and aligning service-learning projects that maximize student learning outcomes. We introduce a feasibility assessment model with criteria evaluated through a standardized rubric that guides instructors to critically assess the project fit to help in proactively identifying risks to student outcomes. The rubric serves a dual purpose: guiding the assessment process and prompting discussions with potential project partners. These discussions elicit crucial details about the project scope, potential challenges, and other critical factors. This not only facilitates effective project selection but also allows for necessary adjustments to project parameters, significantly improving the chances of successful student completion. This work builds on the experience accumulated by CCSU's Software Engineering Studio which connects community project partners with teams of 4–5 seniors working on software development projects spanning one or several semesters. Since 2014, the Software Engineering Studio has facilitated over 65 distinct projects and engaged over 550 students. By capturing the lessons learned across a wide range of successful service-learning projects, we show the value of using a feasibility assessment model to evaluate potential projects based on criteria including alignment with course goals, student skill sets, workload manage-ability, educational engagement, and other considerations. The application of this model is illustrated with a case study, which demonstrates how this model helps instructors align projects with academic goals while considering scope, risks, and other critical elements. This example demonstrates how the model facilitates communication with project partners, identifies potential risks, and guides project adjustments to ensure a successful learning experience for students. The approach is transferable to other disciplines with adaptations for project types and student skills. This work contributes to the field of service learning by offering a practical framework for integrating valuable real-world projects into the curriculum while prioritizing student learning outcomes. Chad A. Williams, Stanislav Kurkovsky, Michael Goldweber, Nathan Sommer |
FIE | 4 |
| 2024 | External Projects and Partners: Addressing Challenges and Minimizing Risks from the OutsetabstractSoftware development projects sourced from external organizations can serve as an excellent platform to help build student competencies because they often provide an environment where students can practice applying their knowledge and skills in an authentic context. However, there are many challenges and risks that can jeopardize the successful execution of such projects. In this report, we discuss some of the lessons learned about the pain points encountered by computing faculty with over a decade of experience running a software engineering studio where teams of undergraduate students work on long-term projects sourced from external partners. Our experience is based on working with a mix of project partners with a major emphasis on non-profit and community organizations and non-technical project partners. We focus on a strategy to carefully screen prospective projects to reveal possible challenges in order to avoid or minimize risks that could impact student learning outcomes. Stanislav Kurkovsky, Chad A. Williams, Michael Goldweber, Nathan Sommer |
ITiCSE (1) | 4 |
| 2024 | Scaffolded Projects for the Social Good: A Strategy for Deploying Studio Model in CS EducationabstractScaffolded Projects for the Social Good (SPSG) is an adaptable service-learning framework with a low adoption threshold based on the studio model. Its goal is to enable instructors to easily embed externally sourced projects supporting Computing for the Social Good (CSG) concepts into existing software engineering or similar courses and addresses the barriers common to service learning, as well as other frameworks with similar CSG-related objectives. Establishing connections between computing and its societal benefits has proven to be an effective strategy for attracting students, especially those from underrepresented groups within the discipline. Furthermore, this work supports competency-based learning by offering students an opportunity to solve real-world problems in an authentic environment using current industrial practices and tools coupled with strong mentoring support from volunteer professionals and near-peers. Using a studio model helps overcome the timing impedance between the length of a single academic term and the timeframes required to complete real-world projects with student teams. Stanislav Kurkovsky, Michael Goldweber, Nathan Sommer, Chad A. Williams |
SIGCSE (2) | 3 |
| 2024 | Community-based Service Learning: Best Practices in Software Projects with Community PartnersabstractCommunity-engaged learning is an emerging term for a wide spectrum of learning activities that bring together students and community partners in a mutually beneficial way. Service learning is a subcategory of community-engaged learning which traditionally involves the students using their skills or expertise on a project that will directly benefit the community partner. In computer science, service learning projects often include a deliverable, such as designing and building an application. Community-based service learning is service learning with a community partner, usually a non-profit, whose mission is to improve the social, environmental, or economic situation for community members. Stanislav Kurkovsky, Chad A. Williams, Michael Goldweber, Nathan Sommer |
SIGCSE (2) | 4 |