Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Raghav Seshadri

dblp:146/9611 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-4884-8646ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Query processing and optimization · 57% Machine learning and data management · 24% Data integration and cleaning · 19%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization
aggregate query processing
1.522024
A Neural Database for Answering Aggregate Queries on Incomplete Relational Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024
A Neural Database for Answering Aggregate Queries on Incomplete Relational Data (Extended Abstract) · ICDE 2024
Query processing and optimization
approximate query processing
0.812024
A Neural Database for Answering Aggregate Queries on Incomplete Relational Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024
Data integration and cleaning › missing data
missing value imputation
0.812024
A Neural Database for Answering Aggregate Queries on Incomplete Relational Data (Extended Abstract) · ICDE 2024
Machine learning and data management
data management for machine learning
0.212024
A Neural Database for Answering Aggregate Queries on Incomplete Relational Data (Extended Abstract) · ICDE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic data generation · 0.8query embedding · 0.8neural network · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 A Neural Database for Answering Aggregate Queries on Incomplete Relational Data (Extended Abstract)
abstract
Real-world datasets are often incomplete due to data collection cost, privacy considerations or as a side effect of data integration/preparation. We focus on answering aggregate queries on such datasets, where data incompleteness causes the answers to be inaccurate. To address this problem, assuming typical relational data, existing work generates synthetic data to complete the database, a challenging task, especially in the presence of bias in observed data.
Sepanta Zeighami, Raghav Seshadri, Cyrus Shahabi
ICDE2
2024 A Neural Database for Answering Aggregate Queries on Incomplete Relational Data
abstract
Real-world datasets are often incomplete due to data collection cost, privacy considerations or as a side effect of data integration/preparation. We focus on answering aggregate queries on such datasets, where data incompleteness causes the answers to be inaccurate. To address this problem, assuming typical relational data, existing work generates synthetic data to complete the database, a challenging task, especially in the presence of bias in observed data. Instead, we propose a paradigm shift by learning to directly estimate query answers, circumventing the difficult data generation step. Our approach, dubbed NeuroComplete, learns to answer queries in three steps. First, NeuroComplete generates a set of queries for which accurate answers can be computed given the incomplete dataset. Next, it embeds queries in a feature space, through which each query is effectively represented with the portion of the database that contributes to the query answer. Finally, it trains a neural network in a supervised learning fashion: both query features (input) and correct answers (labels) are known. The learned model generates accurate answers to new queries at test time, exploiting the generalizability of the learned model in the embedding space. Extensive experimental results on real datasets show up to 4 times for AVG queries and 10 times for COUNT queries error reduction compared with the state-of-the-art.
Sepanta Zeighami, Raghav Seshadri, Cyrus Shahabi
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2