Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yizeng Sun

dblp:147/0908 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
LDPC codes
0.212014
Non-Binary Protograph-Based LDPC Codes: Enumerators, Analysis, and Designs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2014
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › iterative decoding › iterative decoding analysis
decoding threshold
0.112014
Non-Binary Protograph-Based LDPC Codes: Enumerators, Analysis, and Designs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2014
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › iterative decoding › iterative decoding analysis
EXIT chart analysis
0.112014
Non-Binary Protograph-Based LDPC Codes: Enumerators, Analysis, and Designs · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

combinatorial enumeration · 0.2asymptotic growth rate analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Non-Binary Protograph-Based LDPC Codes: Enumerators, Analysis, and Designs
abstract
This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of nonbinary low-density parity check (LDPC) codes built out of protographs. We consider both random and constrained edge-weight labeling, and refer to the former as the unconstrained nonbinary protograph-based LDPC codes (U-NBPB codes) and to the latter as the constrained nonbinary protograph-based LDPC codes (C-NBPB codes). Equipped with combinatorial definitions extended to the nonbinary domain, ensemble enumerators of codewords, trapping sets, stopping sets, and pseudocodewords are calculated. The exact enumerators are presented in the finite-length regime, and the corresponding growth rates are calculated in the asymptotic regime. An EXIT chart tool for computing the iterative decoding thresholds of protograph-based LDPC codes is presented, followed by several examples of finite-length U-NBPB and C-NBPB codes with high performance. Throughout this paper, we provide accompanying examples, which demonstrate the advantage of nonbinary protograph-based LDPC codes over their binary counterparts and over random constructions. The results presented in this paper advance the analytical toolbox of nonbinary graph-based codes.
Lara Dolecek, Dariush Divsalar, Yizeng Sun, Behzad Amiri
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3