VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jesse Jackson
dblp:147/1169
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Query processing and optimization › adaptive query processing
dynamic query optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dynamically optimizing queries over large scale data platforms · SIGMOD Conference 2014 |
Query processing and optimization
query optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Dynamically optimizing queries over large scale data platforms · SIGMOD Conference 2014 |
High-performance computing › data-intensive computing
large-scale data processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Dynamically optimizing queries over large scale data platforms · SIGMOD Conference 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user-defined functions · 0.4cost-based optimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Dynamically optimizing queries over large scale data platformsabstractEnterprises are adapting large-scale data processing platforms, such as Hadoop, to gain actionable insights from their "big data". Query optimization is still an open challenge in this environment due to the volume and heterogeneity of data, comprising both structured and un/semi-structured datasets. Moreover, it has become common practice to push business logic close to the data via user-defined functions (UDFs), which are usually opaque to the optimizer, further complicating cost-based optimization. As a result, classical relational query optimization techniques do not fit well in this setting, while at the same time, suboptimal query plans can be disastrous with large datasets. In this paper, we propose new techniques that take into account UDFs and correlations between relations for optimizing queries running on large scale clusters. We introduce "pilot runs", which execute part of the query over a sample of the data to estimate selectivities, and employ a cost-based optimizer that uses these selectivities to choose an initial query plan. Then, we follow a dynamic optimization approach, in which plans evolve as parts of the queries get executed. Our experimental results show that our techniques produce plans that are at least as good as, and up to 2x (4x) better for Jaql (Hive) than, the best hand-written left-deep query plans. Konstantinos Karanasos, Andrey Balmin, Marcel Kutsch, Fatma Özcan 0001, Vuk Ercegovac, Chunyang Xia, Jesse Jackson |
SIGMOD Conference | 7 |