VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Erika S. Mesh
dblp:147/2129
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-8417-6246ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Empirical software engineering · 23% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
software process improvement |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Supporting Scientific SE Process Improvement · ICSE (2) 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
qualitative research · 0.2framework design · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | WIP: Characterizing the Impact of Perfectionism on MS GDD StudentsabstractThis work-in-progress research-to-practice paper examines the impact of perfectionism and burnout among Master's Game Design and Development (GDD) students. Utilizing the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS)., the study identifies perfectionist tendencies and correlates them with students' definitions of success, experiences with burnout, and strategies for coping with these challenges. Results from this pilot study reveal significant levels of perfectionism, particularly in areas such as concern over mistakes and high personal standards, which correlate with frequent burnout experiences. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses highlights both adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies, offering insights into potential curriculum interventions aimed at improving student well-being. These findings provide a foundation for future research and the development of educational structures that better support students in managing perfectionism and mitigating its adverse effects. Kyle C. James, Erika S. Mesh, David Simkins |
FIE | 2 |
| 2015 | Supporting Scientific SE Process ImprovementabstractThe increasing complexity of scientific software can result in significant impacts on the research itself. In traditional software development projects, teams adopt historical best practices into their development processes to mitigate the risk of such problems. In contrast, the gap that has formed between the traditional and scientific software communities leaves scientists to rely on only their own experience when facing software process improvement (SPI) decisions. Rather than expect scientists to become software engineering (SE) experts or the SE community to learn all of the intricacies involved in scientific software development projects, we seek a middle ground. The Scientific Software Process Improvement Framework (SciSPIF) will allow scientists to self-drive their own SPI efforts while leveraging the collective experiences of their peers and linking their concerns to established SE best practices. This proposal outlines the known challenges of scientific software development, relevant concepts from traditional SE research, and our planned methodology for collecting the data required to construct SciSPIF while staying grounded in the actual goals and concerns of the scientists. Erika S. Mesh |
ICSE (2) | 1 |