VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stephen J. Maher
dblp:147/2221
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3773-6882ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 3 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Introducing Automatically Derived Subproblem Relaxations in a Logic-Based Benders Decomposition Solver
Sachin Rajendran, Stephen J. Maher, Elina Rönnberg |
CPAIOR | 2 |
| 2023 | Subproblem Separation in Logic-Based Benders' Decomposition for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Local Congestion
Aigerim Saken, Stephen J. Maher |
ATMOS | 2 |
| 2023 | Enabling Research through the SCIP Optimization Suite 8.0abstractThe SCIP Optimization Suite provides a collection of software packages for mathematical optimization centered around the constraint integer programming framework SCIP . The focus of this article is on the role of the SCIP Optimization Suite in supporting research. SCIP ’s main design principles are discussed, followed by a presentation of the latest performance improvements and developments in version 8.0, which serve both as examples of SCIP ’s application as a research tool and as a platform for further developments. Furthermore, this article gives an overview of interfaces to other programming and modeling languages, new features that expand the possibilities for user interaction with the framework, and the latest developments in several extensions built upon SCIP . Ksenia Bestuzheva, Mathieu Besançon, Antonia Chmiela, Tim Donkiewicz, Jasper van Doornmalen, Leon Eifler, Oliver Gaul, Gerald Gamrath, Ambros M. Gleixner, Leona Gottwald, Christoph Graczyk, Katrin Halbig, Alexander Hoen, Christopher Hojny, Rolf van der Hulst, Thorsten Koch, Marco E. Lübbecke, Stephen J. Maher, Frederic Matter, Erik Mühmer, Benjamin Müller 0002, Marc E. Pfetsch, Daniel Rehfeldt, Steffan Schlein, Franziska Schlösser, Felipe Serrano 0001, Yuji Shinano, Boro Sofranac, Mark Turner 0010, Stefan Vigerske, Fabian Wegscheider, Philipp Wellner, Dieter Weninger, Jakob Witzig |
ACM Trans. Math. Softw. | 19 |
| 2019 | Reduction techniques for the prize collecting Steiner tree problem and the maximum-weight connected subgraph problemabstractAbstract The concept of reduction has frequently distinguished itself as a pivotal ingredient of exact solving approaches for the Steiner tree problem in graphs. In this article we broaden the focus and consider reduction techniques for three Steiner problem variants that have been extensively discussed in the literature and entail various practical applications: The prize‐collecting Steiner tree problem, the rooted prize‐collecting Steiner tree problem and the maximum‐weight connected subgraph problem. By introducing and subsequently deploying numerous new reduction methods, we are able to drastically decrease the size of a large number of benchmark instances, already solving more than 90% of them to optimality. Furthermore, we demonstrate the impact of these techniques on exact solving, using the example of the state‐of‐the‐art Steiner problem solver SCIP‐Jack . Daniel Rehfeldt, Thorsten Koch, Stephen J. Maher |
Networks | 3 |
| 2017 | Distributed Domain PropagationabstractPortfolio parallelization is an approach that runs several solver instances in parallel and terminates when one of them succeeds in solving the problem. Despite its simplicity, portfolio parallelization has been shown to perform well for modern mixed-integer programming (MIP) and boolean satisfiability problem (SAT) solvers. Domain propagation has also been shown to be a simple technique in modern MIP and SAT solvers that effectively finds additional domain reductions after the domain of a variable has been reduced. In this paper we introduce distributed domain propagation, a technique that shares bound tightenings across solvers to trigger further domain propagations. We investigate its impact in modern MIP solvers that employ portfolio parallelization. Computational experiments were conducted for two implementations of this parallelization approach. While both share global variable bounds and solutions, they communicate differently. In one implementation the communication is performed only at designated points in the solving process and in the other it is performed completely asynchronously. Computational experiments show a positive performance impact of communicating global variable bounds and provide valuable insights in communication strategies for parallel solvers. Robert Lion Gottwald, Stephen J. Maher, Yuji Shinano |
SEA | 2 |